本文選題：司法三段論 + 大前提　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 司法三段論在法官判案的司法實踐中具有重要的作用。但是,它不能象邏輯三段論那樣,由大、小前提直接推出必然的判決結(jié)果。司法三段論的大前提是法律規(guī)范,法律規(guī)范是應(yīng)然的規(guī)范性陳述;司法三段論的小前提是案件事實,案件事實是一個實然的命題。如何從應(yīng)然的法律規(guī)范和實然的案件事實推出正確的法律判決?這是在傳統(tǒng)的“事實”與“規(guī)范”二分的觀念下,司法三段論不得不面臨的一個難題。司法判決要追求的不是客觀性,而是判決的可接受性。司法判決做出的過程絕非單純的司法三段論的推理模式,它涉及到一系列復(fù)雜的法律推理和價值判斷。因此,要解決這一“實然”與“應(yīng)然”的問題,必須打破傳統(tǒng)的二分觀念,從一種詮釋學(xué)的認(rèn)識論角度出發(fā),重新認(rèn)識司法三段論推理模式中的大、小前提。在開始三段論的推理之前,必須先使法定構(gòu)成要件中的規(guī)范事實與現(xiàn)實中具體的生活事實進(jìn)入一種關(guān)系,在這種關(guān)系中使它們相同,從而實現(xiàn)在事實中對規(guī)范的再認(rèn)識,以及在規(guī)范中對事實的再認(rèn)識。司法三段論的大、小前提的獲得離不開詮釋學(xué)觀念下的法律解釋與法律論證理論的結(jié)合。這種觀念的轉(zhuǎn)變和方法的多樣化有助于法官探尋法律規(guī)范和案件事實中共同的“意義”,從而做出既合乎邏輯,又具有說服力的司法判決。
[Abstract]:Judicial syllogism plays an important role in judicial practice. However, it can not be as logical syllogism, from large, small premises directly infer the inevitable outcome. The major premise of judicial syllogism is the legal norm, the legal norm is the normative statement as it should be, and the small premise of judicial syllogism is the facts of the case, and the facts of the case are a real proposition. How to put forward the correct legal judgment from the legal norms and the actual facts of the case? This is a difficult problem that judicial syllogism has to face under the traditional dichotomy of "fact" and "norm". What the judicial decision should pursue is not objectivity, but the acceptability of the judgment. The process of judicial decision is not a simple judicial syllogism reasoning model, it involves a series of complicated legal reasoning and value judgment. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, we must break the traditional dichotomy and reunderstand the big and small premises of judicial syllogism from the perspective of epistemology of hermeneutics. Before we start the syllogism reasoning, we must put the normative facts in the legal constituent elements into a relationship with the concrete life facts in reality, and make them the same in this relation, so as to realize the reunderstanding of the norms in the facts. And the recognition of the fact in the norm. The acquisition of judicial syllogism is inseparable from the combination of legal interpretation and legal argumentation under hermeneutics. The transformation of this concept and the diversification of methods will help the judges to explore the common "meaning" in the legal norms and the facts of the case, so as to make both logical and persuasive judicial decisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D90-051;D916

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張其山;;司法三段論研究[J];青海社會科學(xué);2007年04期

2 焦寶乾;;三段論推理在法律論證中的作用探討[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2007年01期

，

本文編號：2101680