本文選題：商譽(yù) + 商標(biāo)許可　； 參考：《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)》2013年06期

【摘要】：我國(guó)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》規(guī)定了包裝裝潢權(quán),但并沒(méi)有直接規(guī)定商標(biāo)許可合同中產(chǎn)生的包裝裝潢權(quán)的權(quán)益歸屬。相對(duì)而言,美國(guó)不僅規(guī)定了類(lèi)似于包裝裝潢權(quán)的商品外觀權(quán),而且對(duì)商標(biāo)許可合同中的商品外觀權(quán)益歸屬作出了具體規(guī)定。研究美國(guó)相關(guān)制度,有助于我國(guó)對(duì)商標(biāo)許可合同中商譽(yù)歸屬問(wèn)題的深入認(rèn)識(shí)。
[Abstract]:China's Anti-unfair Competition Law stipulates the right of packaging decoration, but it does not directly regulate the rights and interests of packaging and decoration arising from trademark licensing contracts. Comparatively speaking, the United States not only stipulates the right of appearance of goods similar to the right of packaging and decoration, but also specifies the ownership of the rights and interests of commodity appearance in the trademark license contract. The study of the relevant systems in the United States is helpful to the in-depth understanding of the attribution of goodwill in trademark licensing contracts in China.
【作者單位】： 中原工學(xué)院;武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D971.2;D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王禹;商業(yè)詆毀行為的法律思考[J];科技與法律;2004年01期

2 遲少杰;;包裝裝潢侵權(quán)認(rèn)定原則——評(píng)中國(guó)首例涉外包裝裝潢糾紛案[J];中國(guó)專(zhuān)利與商標(biāo);1999年01期

3 單曉光;德國(guó)及歐盟反壟斷法中的商標(biāo)許可合同[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年01期

4 肖明;何s鉈，

本文編號(hào)：2047474