發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-20 04:07

  本文選題：介入 + 真實(shí)性��； 參考：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本論文旨在根據(jù)J.R.Martin和P.R.R.White的評(píng)價(jià)理論來研究民事法庭審判語篇中使用的最主要的評(píng)價(jià)資源以及這些主要的評(píng)價(jià)資源在民事法庭審判中是怎樣運(yùn)用的。之后,該論文根據(jù)Jef Verschueren的順應(yīng)理論來研究為什么民事法庭審判中的各方要在法庭審判中使用這些主要的評(píng)價(jià)資源。該論文的研究目標(biāo)就是要找出庭審中的各參與方使用評(píng)價(jià)資源的潛在規(guī)律。 首先,本論文以從中法網(wǎng)上選取的十個(gè)民事庭審語篇為語料并且通過使用描述法和說明的方法來描述在民事法庭語篇中使用的評(píng)價(jià)資源,即民事法庭審判語篇中都使用了態(tài)度資源、介入資源和級(jí)差資源。隨后該論文從統(tǒng)計(jì)中得出結(jié)論:介入資源是民事法庭語篇中最經(jīng)常使用的資源。 眾所周知,法庭審判重視證據(jù)。與此同時(shí),法官和人民陪審員也高度關(guān)注證據(jù)。在民事法庭審判中,原被告雙方為了實(shí)現(xiàn)各自的目的以及維護(hù)自己的權(quán)利和利益,原被告中的一方總是竭盡全力的證明對(duì)方的證據(jù)是虛假的、無關(guān)的以及是非法的,以此來說服法官和人民陪審員。由此可見,證據(jù)的可信度在民事法庭審判中是十分重要的,因此,本文的第二個(gè)研究問題就是法庭審判的各方是如何通過主要評(píng)價(jià)資源的應(yīng)用來更好的說明己方證據(jù)的可信度以及對(duì)方證據(jù)的不可信的,即庭審中的各方是怎樣通過使用主要的評(píng)價(jià)資源來達(dá)到證明(駁倒)己方(對(duì)方)證據(jù)的可信度的。 對(duì)于第三個(gè)研究問題,該論文使用Jef Verschueren's的順應(yīng)理論,特別是三個(gè)世界(物理世界、心理世界以及社交世界)的理論來解釋為什么要使用這些主要的評(píng)價(jià)資源。 該論文的意義在于通過對(duì)十個(gè)民事法庭審判語篇的研究來給從語言學(xué)的角度研究法庭審判提供一定的思考,擴(kuò)大評(píng)價(jià)理論應(yīng)用的范圍以及給法律界的學(xué)者們一些啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:Based on the evaluation theory of J. R. Martin and P.R.R. White, this thesis aims to study the most important evaluation resources used in civil court discourse and how these main evaluation resources are used in civil court trials. Then, according to Jef Verschueren's adaptation theory, this paper studies why the parties in the civil court trial should use these main evaluation resources in the court trial. The purpose of this paper is to find out the potential rules of using evaluation resources by participants in the trial. First of all, this thesis uses ten civil trial texts selected from the Chinese legal Network as the corpus and describes the evaluation resources used in civil court discourse by using descriptive and explanatory methods. In other words, the civil court trial discourse uses attitude resources, intervention resources and differential resources. Then the paper draws a conclusion from statistics that intervention resources are the most frequently used resources in civil court discourse. It is well known that court trials attach importance to evidence. At the same time, judges and people's jurors are also highly concerned about evidence. In civil court trials, in order to achieve their respective purposes and safeguard their rights and interests, one of the original defendants always does their utmost to prove that the other party's evidence is false, irrelevant and illegal. In order to persuade the judge and the people's jury. It can be seen that the credibility of the evidence is very important in civil court trials. The second research question in this paper is how the parties to the court trial can use the main evaluation resources to better explain the credibility of their own evidence and the credibility of the other party's evidence. That is, how the parties in the trial use the main evaluation resources to prove (refute) their own evidence. For the third question, this paper uses the adaptation theory of Jef Verschuerens, especially the theory of three worlds (physical world, psychological world and social world) to explain why these main evaluation resources should be used. The significance of this thesis is to provide some thoughts for the study of court trial from the perspective of linguistics, to expand the scope of application of the evaluation theory and to enlighten the scholars in the legal profession through the study of the discourse of ten civil court trials.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D90-055;H030

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉娟;;法庭語言的語用特征探析[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

2 王青華,王少豪;美國(guó)企業(yè)財(cái)產(chǎn)征用過程中的商譽(yù)損失及其評(píng)估[J];中國(guó)資產(chǎn)評(píng)估;2001年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2042885