本文選題：唐朝 + 贖刑�。� 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 唐朝贖刑制度是唐朝時(shí)期的一項(xiàng)重要的刑事司法制度。贖刑制度始存在于夏朝,經(jīng)過(guò)歷朝歷代的發(fā)展,至唐朝時(shí)已日臻成熟完備,唐朝的贖刑制度適用范圍較廣,內(nèi)容規(guī)范具體,最能夠體現(xiàn)封建贖刑制度的實(shí)質(zhì),其規(guī)范化和制度化在封建社會(huì)極具代表性。唐朝贖刑制度是封建社會(huì)贖刑制度的典范,是研究贖刑制度的很好的樣本。 本文在引言中介紹了贖刑制度的概念、發(fā)展歷程、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究意義,分析了唐朝統(tǒng)治者的法律思想及對(duì)贖刑制度的影響。之后從唐朝贖刑制度的研究現(xiàn)狀入手,對(duì)這一制度從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析和研究：一、唐朝贖刑制度的內(nèi)容。這一部分主要從唐朝贖刑制度的適用對(duì)象和限制適用的情況,以及唐朝贖刑制度的等級(jí)三個(gè)方面闡述了唐朝贖刑制度的具體內(nèi)容,是從立法的角度,研究靜態(tài)的唐朝贖刑制度。這是因?yàn)檠芯刻瞥H刑制度首先應(yīng)當(dāng)弄清楚唐律是如何規(guī)定贖刑制度的。二、唐朝贖刑制度的施行。這一部分主要包括贖刑的方式、贖刑的決定機(jī)關(guān)、司法官在贖刑適用過(guò)程中的責(zé)任、徒刑過(guò)程中如何改易為贖刑、贖刑與官當(dāng)?shù)奶子�、贖刑執(zhí)行的期限、贖刑給犯罪官吏帶來(lái)的行政后果以及錯(cuò)判案件中的贖刑如何處置等。三、唐朝贖刑制度的特點(diǎn)。這一部分闡述了唐朝贖刑制度具有的特點(diǎn),具體包括適用范圍廣、強(qiáng)化故意與過(guò)失的區(qū)分、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)明確。四、唐朝贖刑制度的作用。這一部分主要是評(píng)價(jià)唐朝贖刑制度在當(dāng)時(shí)的社會(huì)起到了怎樣的作用,概括來(lái)說(shuō)有消極的作用也有積極的作用,本部分對(duì)兩方面的作用都做了詳細(xì)的說(shuō)明。五、唐朝贖刑制度的現(xiàn)代意義。這一部分在研究唐朝贖刑制度的基礎(chǔ)上將唐朝贖刑制度的內(nèi)容與現(xiàn)代贖刑的構(gòu)建相結(jié)合,具體從贖刑制度的適用對(duì)象、贖刑制度與財(cái)產(chǎn)刑、贖刑制度的原則、贖刑制度的方式四個(gè)角度將唐朝贖刑制度與現(xiàn)代法治結(jié)合。在鑒別唐朝贖刑制度中的糟粕與精華的同時(shí),對(duì)現(xiàn)代刑罰體系提出建議,目的是能夠復(fù)建贖刑制度,以彌補(bǔ)短期自由刑的不足,體現(xiàn)刑罰的人道主義精神和加強(qiáng)刑罰的預(yù)防犯罪作用。 文章結(jié)論部分從辯證唯物主義的角度分析唐朝贖刑制度的局限性和積極性,存在了幾千年的贖刑制度首先是封建王朝的特權(quán)法,貫穿唐朝始終的唐朝贖刑制度也同樣由于所處的具體歷史環(huán)境而不可避免的帶有一定的局限性,但是作為唐朝時(shí)期一項(xiàng)重要的司法手段,贖刑制度依然發(fā)揮了一定的積極作用。對(duì)唐朝贖刑制度的分析和總結(jié),對(duì)其進(jìn)行恰當(dāng)?shù)脑u(píng)價(jià),總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn)構(gòu)建現(xiàn)代的贖刑制度,對(duì)于現(xiàn)代刑罰體系的完善以及社會(huì)主義法制的建設(shè)具有重要意義。
[Abstract]:The system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty is an important criminal justice system in Tang Dynasty. The foreclosure system began to exist in Xia Dynasty. Through the development of successive dynasties, it was maturing and complete by the Tang Dynasty, and its scope of application was relatively wide, and its contents were standardized and concrete, which could best reflect the essence of the feudal system of redeeming punishment. Its standardization and institutionalization are very representative in feudal society. The system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty is the model of the redeeming system in feudal society and a good sample for studying the system of foreclosure. In the introduction, this paper introduces the concept, development course, research status and significance of the foreclosure system, and analyzes the legal thought of the rulers of the Tang Dynasty and its influence on the foreclosure system. After that, the author analyzes and studies this system from the following aspects: first, the content of the system of redeeming in Tang Dynasty. This part mainly expounds the concrete contents of the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty from three aspects: the applicable object of the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty and the situation of limiting its application, as well as the grade of the system of foreclosure in Tang Dynasty. It studies the static system of foreclosure in Tang Dynasty from the angle of legislation. This is because the study of the Tang Dynasty foreclosure system should first of all find out how Tang Law prescribes the foreclosure system. Second, the implementation of the system of redeeming punishment in the Tang Dynasty. This part mainly includes the way of redeeming punishment, the deciding organ of foreclosure penalty, the responsibility of the magistrate in the process of applying the punishment of redemption, how to change it into redeeming punishment in the course of imprisonment, the formality of foreclosure with the official, the time limit of the execution of the foreclosure. The administrative consequences of foreclosure to criminal officials and how to deal with the punishment in misjudged cases. Third, the characteristics of the system of atonement in Tang Dynasty. This part expounds the characteristics of the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty, including the wide scope of application, the strengthening of the distinction between intent and negligence, and the clear standards. Fourth, the role of the system of atonement in the Tang Dynasty. This part is mainly to evaluate the Tang Dynasty foreclosure system in the society at that time what kind of role, generally speaking has a negative role also has a positive role, this part of the two aspects of the role of a detailed explanation. Fifth, the modern significance of the system of redeeming punishment in the Tang Dynasty. On the basis of studying the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty, this part combines the content of the system of foreclosure in Tang Dynasty with the construction of modern foreclosure, specifically from the applicable object of the system, the system of foreclosure, the principle of property penalty, and the system of foreclosure. The way of redeem punishment system combines Tang Dynasty redeem penalty system with modern rule of law. While discriminating the dross and essence of the atonement system in the Tang Dynasty, the paper puts forward some suggestions on the modern penalty system, in order to restore the foreclosure system, so as to make up for the deficiency of the short-term free punishment. Embody the humanism spirit of penalty and strengthen the crime prevention function of penalty. The conclusion of the article analyzes the limitation and enthusiasm of the atonement system in the Tang Dynasty from the angle of dialectical materialism. It is the privilege law of the feudal dynasty that has existed for thousands of years. The atonement system of Tang Dynasty, which runs through the Tang Dynasty, also inevitably has some limitations because of its specific historical environment. However, as an important judicial means in the Tang Dynasty, the foreclosure system still plays a positive role. It is of great significance for the perfection of modern penalty system and the construction of socialist legal system to analyze and summarize the system of redeeming punishment in Tang Dynasty, to evaluate it properly and to sum up its experience.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D929;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張兆凱;;贖刑的廢除與理性回歸[J];北方法學(xué);2008年06期

2 楊武松;唐代官制特權(quán)立法考辯[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

3 毛淑玲;劉金鵬;;刑事法中的推定與無(wú)罪推定[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年12期

4 閆晶;;由我國(guó)古代贖刑看“賠錢(qián)減刑”制度之合理性[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年04期

5 陳嘉俊;論中國(guó)古代的贖刑制度──兼議現(xiàn)代以罰代刑的若干問(wèn)題[J];江蘇公安專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1998年05期

6 嚴(yán)國(guó)慶;從云夢(mèng)秦簡(jiǎn)看秦的贖刑制度[J];江蘇廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

7 陳怡;;小議中國(guó)古代刑罰贖刑[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年20期

8 趙旭;;宋代贖刑制度考述[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

9 陳譚娟;中國(guó)古代贖刑與罰金刑之區(qū)別[J];理論月刊;2005年10期

10 胡高飛;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)贖刑及其啟示[J];求索;2008年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳靈海;唐代刑部[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

2 趙旭;法律制度與唐宋社會(huì)秩序[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 蔣建宇;刑罰易科制度研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

2 劉科進(jìn);明代贖刑制度的司法特點(diǎn)及其局限性[D];西南大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2038757