本文選題：類(lèi)型 + 習(xí)慣法�。� 參考：《廣西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：習(xí)慣法的研究是一種跨越法學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、民族學(xué)、歷史學(xué)的綜合性研究。近年來(lái)我國(guó)習(xí)慣法取得了長(zhǎng)足的發(fā)展和一定的成就。但是我國(guó)習(xí)慣法的研究并未走向“成熟”,反而在進(jìn)入了研究上的“瓶頸期”。其中最主要的問(wèn)題是我國(guó)的習(xí)慣法研究呈現(xiàn)出碎片化,學(xué)者們對(duì)于研究方法和分析框架的理解各不相同,很難形成有效的對(duì)話。如研究方法在傳統(tǒng)的文獻(xiàn)研究和實(shí)證的社會(huì)學(xué)研究之間還不能達(dá)到一種令人滿意的融合程度；如在理論建樹(shù)方面大多簡(jiǎn)單局限在“尋求國(guó)家法與習(xí)慣法良性互動(dòng)”的建議；如我國(guó)習(xí)慣法研究的分析框架仍然是西方式的,容易簡(jiǎn)單套用西方理論來(lái)解讀和分析我國(guó)的傳統(tǒng)文化等。這些都急需對(duì)我國(guó)習(xí)慣法的研究進(jìn)行一種外部的、整體上的梳理和反思。 類(lèi)型及類(lèi)型思維是近年來(lái)中國(guó)法學(xué)界一個(gè)較為流行的研究方法,被大多數(shù)的學(xué)者,尤其是中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化研究者所推崇。與傳統(tǒng)的規(guī)范式、概念式的研究方法相比,類(lèi)型思維具有其特有的優(yōu)勢(shì),但是不可否認(rèn)類(lèi)型思維及方法運(yùn)用到我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化的研究中也有其偏薄和不足之處。 本文一方面運(yùn)用類(lèi)型思維及類(lèi)型的方法對(duì)于我國(guó)習(xí)慣法的研究從習(xí)慣法的研究方法、分析框架、主要成果等方面進(jìn)行整體上的梳理和反思,試圖對(duì)我國(guó)目前的習(xí)慣法研究進(jìn)行盤(pán)點(diǎn)和反思。另一方面,在認(rèn)識(shí)到類(lèi)型思維的局限性的基礎(chǔ)上,即反對(duì)一些法律文化研究學(xué)者試圖或者不自覺(jué)的用西方的術(shù)語(yǔ)來(lái)解讀我國(guó)的傳統(tǒng)文化、法治實(shí)踐,從“辯異”式的角度,把西方的法治文化和理論當(dāng)成一種普適性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究我國(guó)豐富的歷史傳統(tǒng)。在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)習(xí)慣法的研究進(jìn)行一些思考,認(rèn)為我國(guó)的習(xí)慣法的研究應(yīng)當(dāng)從習(xí)慣法的內(nèi)在精神出發(fā),立足中國(guó)問(wèn)題并結(jié)合其獨(dú)特的社會(huì)背景進(jìn)行研究；在研究方法上應(yīng)當(dāng)自覺(jué)地把法學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、民族學(xué)、歷史學(xué)等不同的研究方法進(jìn)行整合,走向綜合化的研究。
[Abstract]:The study of customary law is a comprehensive study of law, sociology, ethnology and history. In recent years, China's customary law has made considerable progress and certain achievements. However, the study of Chinese customary law is not mature, but has entered the bottleneck period. The most important problem is that the study of customary law in China is fragmented, and scholars have different understanding of the research methods and analytical framework, so it is difficult to form an effective dialogue. For example, the research method can not achieve a satisfactory degree of fusion between the traditional literature research and the empirical sociological research, for example, in the theoretical construction, most of the research methods are simply confined to the suggestion of "seeking benign interaction between state law and customary law". For example, the analytical framework of the study of customary law in China is still western-style, and it is easy to apply western theories to interpret and analyze the traditional culture of our country. All these are in urgent need of an external, overall carding and reflection on the study of Chinese customary law. Type and type thinking is a popular research method in Chinese legal circles in recent years, which is respected by most scholars, especially the researchers of Chinese traditional legal culture. Compared with the traditional normative and conceptual research methods, the type thinking has its unique advantages, but it is undeniable that the type thinking and method applied to the study of Chinese traditional legal culture also has its weakness and shortcomings. On the one hand, this article uses the type thinking and the type method to study the customary law of our country from the common law research method, the analysis frame, the main achievement and so on, carries on the overall combing and the reflection, so on the aspect and so on. This paper attempts to take stock of and reflect on the current study of customary law in China. On the other hand, on the basis of recognizing the limitation of type thinking, that is to say, some scholars of legal culture try or unconsciously interpret the traditional culture of our country with western terminology, the practice of the rule of law, from the angle of "differentiating different". Regard the western culture and theory of rule of law as a universal standard to study the rich historical tradition of our country. On the basis of this, the author thinks that the study of customary law in our country should proceed from the inner spirit of customary law, be based on Chinese problems and combine with its unique social background. In terms of research methods, we should consciously integrate different research methods such as law, sociology, ethnology, history and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇力;;農(nóng)村基層法院的糾紛解決與規(guī)則之治[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1999年01期

2 高其才;;傳承和弘揚(yáng):瑤族習(xí)慣法在人民調(diào)解中的運(yùn)用——以廣西金秀一起相鄰排水糾紛的調(diào)解為例[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

3 蘇力;為什么研究中國(guó)基層司法制度——《送法下鄉(xiāng)》導(dǎo)論[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年03期

4 陳景良;反思法律史研究中的“類(lèi)型學(xué)”方法——中國(guó)法律史研究的另一種思路[J];法商研究;2004年05期

5 李少偉;現(xiàn)代文化與現(xiàn)代法的精神[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

6 高其才;;習(xí)慣法研究的路徑與反思[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

7 蔣超;李小朋;;民商事習(xí)慣法研究范圍的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];桂海論叢;2013年01期

8 易軍;;論習(xí)慣法與國(guó)家法的辯證關(guān)系[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

9 劉作翔;;傳統(tǒng)的延續(xù):習(xí)慣在現(xiàn)代中國(guó)法制中的地位和作用[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年01期

10 徐忠明;;辨異與解釋:中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化的類(lèi)型研究及其局限——《尋求自然秩序中的和諧》讀后[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;1998年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2025656