本文選題：信用證欺詐例外 + 實(shí)質(zhì)性欺詐��； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 中國(guó)是一個(gè)貿(mào)易大國(guó),近年來(lái)貿(mào)易額一直位居世界前列。中國(guó)企業(yè)實(shí)施“走出去”戰(zhàn)略,必然要和國(guó)外的企業(yè)發(fā)生這樣或那樣的聯(lián)系和貿(mào)易,如何在對(duì)外貿(mào)易中及時(shí)穩(wěn)定地收到貨款,這關(guān)系到企業(yè)的利益和走出去的積極性。因此學(xué)習(xí)和研究信用證欺詐及其例外就顯得十分必要。美國(guó)在信用證法律方面積累了豐富的司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒這些規(guī)定對(duì)健全我國(guó)信用證法律制度具有重大的意義。 本文首先界定了信用證欺詐的概念及種類,分析了信用證欺詐的形成原因,闡述了信用證欺詐例外原則的法理基礎(chǔ)。接著結(jié)合英美相關(guān)案例以及美國(guó)《統(tǒng)一商法典》,分析了信用證欺詐例外制度的案例及成文化過(guò)程,闡述了信用證欺詐例外的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及豁免條件。接下來(lái)介紹了美國(guó)信用證欺詐例制度的救濟(jì)途徑,即請(qǐng)求銀行拒付或申請(qǐng)法院禁令,并詳細(xì)說(shuō)明了各自的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。最后,結(jié)合2006年1月開始施行的《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理信用證糾紛案件若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定》,分析我國(guó)信用證欺詐例外的立法現(xiàn)狀、現(xiàn)階段司法實(shí)踐上存在的一些問(wèn)題,并提出建議。
[Abstract]:China is a large trading country, in recent years, trade volume has been ranked among the world's top. To carry out the "going out" strategy, Chinese enterprises must have one kind of or another kind of contact and trade with foreign enterprises, and how to receive the payment in time and steadily in foreign trade, which is related to the interests of enterprises and the enthusiasm to go out. Therefore, it is very necessary to study and study letter of credit fraud and its exceptions. The United States has accumulated a wealth of judicial experience in the area of letter of credit law, and it is of great significance to study and learn from these provisions to improve the legal system of letters of credit in China. This paper first defines the concept and types of letter of credit fraud, analyzes the causes of letter of credit fraud, and expounds the legal basis of the exception principle of letter of credit fraud. Then, combined with the relevant cases in Britain and America and the uniform Commercial Code of the United States, this paper analyzes the cases and the cultural process of the fraud exception system of the letter of credit, and expounds the applicable standards and exemption conditions of the fraud exception in the letter of credit. Then it introduces the relief ways of American letter of credit fraud system, that is, asking the bank to refuse to pay or apply for court injunction, and explains the respective applicable standards in detail. Finally, in accordance with the provisions of the Supreme people's Court concerning the handling of disputes over letters of credit, which came into effect in January 2006, this paper analyzes the current legislative situation of fraud exceptions in our country's letters of credit, and some problems existing in judicial practice at this stage. And make recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD912.28

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 高艷娜;備用信用證欺詐法律救濟(jì)措施研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 呼家鈺;論保兌行的付款義務(wù)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1977765