本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間 + 法律關(guān)系��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2010年博士論文

【摘要】：人類歷史上每一種關(guān)鍵性技術(shù)的突破,通常都會(huì)導(dǎo)致人類的生活方式甚至基本社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)的轉(zhuǎn)型,從而開(kāi)拓新的生存空間,形成新的生活經(jīng)驗(yàn)和社會(huì)規(guī)則。21世紀(jì)以來(lái)興起的網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)以其迅捷的速度和巨大的力量席卷全球,一個(gè)由網(wǎng)址和密碼組成的虛擬但客觀存在的世界形成了——網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間(Cyberspace)開(kāi)始崛起。作為一種新型開(kāi)放的社會(huì)場(chǎng)域,網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間逐漸改變著人類的生存方式、經(jīng)濟(jì)模式、政治結(jié)構(gòu)和社會(huì)生活,更是對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的法律理論和制度產(chǎn)生了前所未有的沖擊和影響。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間到底為現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的法律帶來(lái)怎樣的挑戰(zhàn)?網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間在法律意義上的屬性為何?網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間如何重構(gòu)現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的法律理論?網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間蘊(yùn)含了怎樣的法律價(jià)值?是否需要一門分支學(xué)問(wèn)來(lái)專門研究和探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律基本問(wèn)題?這一切,都值得法學(xué)研究者深入的思索和積極的探討。在理論上厘清這些根本性的問(wèn)題,有助于人們對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律保持清醒的頭腦,能對(duì)當(dāng)前的網(wǎng)絡(luò)立法提供全局性的理論指導(dǎo),能為具體網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律問(wèn)題的研究提供根本的理論立足點(diǎn)。而這樣根本性的研究由任何一個(gè)部門法學(xué)來(lái)回答都是有失偏頗的,唯有對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間進(jìn)行法理的分析,才能做出真正有效的回應(yīng)。 論文共分五個(gè)部分。引言主要圍繞本文研究的緣起、選題意義、學(xué)術(shù)簡(jiǎn)評(píng)以及研究方法及創(chuàng)新展開(kāi)論述。如何理解網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的法律產(chǎn)生的重大影響,這是本文研究的誘因。試圖有效避免因理論的缺乏而在網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律的實(shí)踐和研究中產(chǎn)生的無(wú)奈與尷尬,是研究進(jìn)一步深入的動(dòng)力來(lái)源。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法理分析具有非常重要的理論意義和實(shí)踐意義。就理論意義而言,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空問(wèn)進(jìn)行法律意義上的理論概括和反思,可以幫助人們從不同視角認(rèn)識(shí)和理解網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間,可以促進(jìn)法理學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域的開(kāi)拓和研究范式的變革,可以促成一門新興的分支學(xué)科——“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的興起與建立。就實(shí)踐意義而言,展開(kāi)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法理分析能有效指導(dǎo)中國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間立法模式的選擇和網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間法律新問(wèn)題的實(shí)際解決。 第一章從網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的定義、特征以及帶來(lái)的社會(huì)影響三個(gè)方面闡釋網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的崛起。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間是信息技術(shù)的產(chǎn)物,但它不僅僅是一個(gè)技術(shù)空間,更是一個(gè)具有虛擬性、匿名性、開(kāi)放性、無(wú)中心權(quán)威性、即時(shí)性以及全球性的社會(huì)空間。它的崛起,逐漸改變著人類的生存方式、經(jīng)濟(jì)模式、政治結(jié)構(gòu)和社會(huì)生活,將人類社會(huì)帶到一個(gè)前所未有的境遇。本章總體說(shuō)來(lái),篇幅較小,主要為論文進(jìn)一步的深入研究鋪設(shè)好論證的場(chǎng)景。 第二章網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律基本問(wèn)題由四個(gè)小節(jié)組成。首先,通過(guò)對(duì)五個(gè)典型網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律案例的剖析,本文展現(xiàn)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間帶來(lái)的法律挑戰(zhàn),指出網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間對(duì)法律的改變和影響是全方位的、深刻的。其次,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律屬性做出界定。評(píng)析現(xiàn)有的學(xué)說(shuō)之后,指出網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間是法律調(diào)整的一個(gè)新空間。在這個(gè)與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)迥異的新調(diào)整領(lǐng)域,法律必須改變現(xiàn)有的規(guī)則和變革自我的理論以適應(yīng)它的發(fā)展。其次,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析。指出在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間,法律關(guān)系的主體呈現(xiàn)多元化和復(fù)雜化的特點(diǎn),虛擬性使得法律關(guān)系主體難以確定,法律關(guān)系主體相比現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)而言有所突破；從有體物到無(wú)形物,從實(shí)在物到虛擬物,法律關(guān)系的客體在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間得到拓展和延伸；新型權(quán)利義務(wù)的不斷涌現(xiàn)和權(quán)利義務(wù)的不平衡性是法律關(guān)系內(nèi)容的新特點(diǎn)。最后,文章分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律責(zé)任,從網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律責(zé)任追究入手,指出法律責(zé)任常常在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中呈“落空”的態(tài)勢(shì)；網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間各種主體的法律責(zé)任面臨著新的情況與可能；對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律責(zé)任種類進(jìn)行總結(jié),指出在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間設(shè)定公法性質(zhì)的法律責(zé)任應(yīng)當(dāng)謹(jǐn)慎,而私法性質(zhì)的法律責(zé)任則可以有所突破�？傊�,在理論層面上對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律基本問(wèn)題進(jìn)行反思,我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn),網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間出現(xiàn)的一系列新問(wèn)題已經(jīng)開(kāi)始逐步突破現(xiàn)有社會(huì)的法律理論,處在艱難的發(fā)展與嬗變中。 第三章網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律價(jià)值。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間是法律調(diào)整的新空間,但并不是對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的顛覆。它依然傳承了現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)基本的法律價(jià)值,秩序、平等、效益、自由和正義都是其應(yīng)有之義,卻又在自我特性中開(kāi)創(chuàng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間法律價(jià)值的新內(nèi)涵。開(kāi)放、共享和民主成為網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間法律新的精神指向。在新價(jià)值指引之下,人類社會(huì)的法律也在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中完成品質(zhì)的提升和自我的進(jìn)化。 第四章“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的興起與建立。首先,分析和闡釋了“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”興起的背景。信息技術(shù)形塑和開(kāi)辟的網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間這一全新社會(huì)場(chǎng)域的探討,不僅涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、文化學(xué)等研究,而且已經(jīng)深入到法學(xué)的研究范疇。理論基礎(chǔ)的薄弱讓網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法學(xué)研究舉步維艱,“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的興起是研究的必然要求和學(xué)科細(xì)化的必然趨勢(shì)。其次,界定“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的概念,是以作為整體的網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間法律的共同性問(wèn)題和一般性問(wèn)題為研究對(duì)象的一門理論法學(xué),它是法理學(xué)的分支學(xué)科。然后本文闡釋了“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的理論來(lái)源,網(wǎng)絡(luò)生存方式理論和網(wǎng)絡(luò)社會(huì)理論能為其提供哲學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)的基礎(chǔ),網(wǎng)絡(luò)倫理理論能為其發(fā)展提供資料和路徑上的借鑒。最后本文簡(jiǎn)單的闡釋了“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的研究?jī)?nèi)容與方法,指出采取多種研究方法界定“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”中基本的概念、分析原則和價(jià)值、厘清“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”與其他學(xué)科之間的關(guān)系都是研究?jī)?nèi)容的重要構(gòu)成。 結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,文章指出網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法理分析背后隱藏的路徑是技術(shù)構(gòu)建社會(huì),社會(huì)改變法律。在法社會(huì)學(xué)的視野中,技術(shù)變遷如同暗流,卻能激起社會(huì)規(guī)則層面法律變革的驚濤駭浪。網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的崛起,必定改變?nèi)祟惿鐣?huì)的法律規(guī)則,這是不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的趨勢(shì),我們能做的,是迎頭面對(duì),認(rèn)真研究。“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”對(duì)不斷展開(kāi)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)理論研究,最終會(huì)取得豐碩的結(jié)果。 論文從三個(gè)層面來(lái)完成網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法理分析。在理論層面的反思是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律基本問(wèn)題做出的剖析。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間是人類社會(huì)一個(gè)獨(dú)具特性的新型場(chǎng)所,它和其他意義的空間攜手共進(jìn),共同構(gòu)成人類的多維度生存。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律關(guān)系已經(jīng)發(fā)生了不同于現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的嬗變,它的變革沖擊著現(xiàn)有社會(huì)的法律理論,促使法律理論的不斷發(fā)展和自我完善；在精神維度的追求闡釋的是網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律價(jià)值,現(xiàn)有社會(huì)的基本法律價(jià)值和新的價(jià)值精神交織相容,共同指引網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間法律的演進(jìn)；研究體系的構(gòu)建是“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的興起和建立。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法理分析雖然具有不可忽視的作用,但要真正把握網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間法律的本質(zhì)、意義、表現(xiàn)、價(jià)值取向和未來(lái)發(fā)展等問(wèn)題,必須由一門系統(tǒng)的學(xué)問(wèn)——“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”對(duì)其加以科學(xué)完善的研究。 在對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間相關(guān)法律理論進(jìn)行必要梳理和闡釋的基礎(chǔ)之上,本文將重點(diǎn)放在他人研究較少或者是尚未研究的領(lǐng)域,并試圖做出一些原創(chuàng)性的研究,力求提出一些新的觀點(diǎn)。主要有：一是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析,歸納了法律關(guān)系主體、客體和內(nèi)容在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的改變,指出其法律理論要素已經(jīng)突破了現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的傳統(tǒng)理論,以網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間為基點(diǎn),發(fā)展新的法律理論和豐富現(xiàn)有法理體系勢(shì)在必行。二是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的法律價(jià)值新內(nèi)涵做出了闡釋。指出開(kāi)放、共享、民主價(jià)值的產(chǎn)生是網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的特性使然,也是人類法律價(jià)值發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì)。三是提出了“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的概念。盡管“網(wǎng)絡(luò)法理學(xué)”的提出還非常生澀,其自身的研究體系也還在構(gòu)建之中,但隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的日漸壯大,它必將成長(zhǎng)為一門重要的法理學(xué)分支學(xué)科,并在網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律世界之中發(fā)揮積極的作用。
[Abstract]:The breakthrough of every key technology in human history usually leads to the transformation of human life style and even basic social structure, thus opening new living space, forming new life experience and social rules, the network technology which has risen since.21 century has swept the globe with its fast speed and great power, one by web site and The virtual but objective world of the cipher is formed - the network space (Cyberspace) begins to rise. As a new and open social field, the network space gradually changes the way of human existence, economic model, political structure and social life, and it has produced an unprecedented impact on the legal theory and system of the real society. Strike and influence.
How does cyberspace challenge the law of the real society? What are the legal attributes of the cyberspace? How does cyberspace reconstruct the legal theory of the real society? What legal value does cyberspace contain? Is it necessary to study and explore the basic legal issues of cyberspace? In theory, it is helpful for people to maintain a sober mind on the law of cyberspace, and to provide global theoretical guidance to the current network legislation, and to provide a fundamental theoretical foothold for the study of specific network law problems. Such a fundamental study is biased by any department law. Only the analysis of the cyberspace can make a real and effective response.
The thesis is divided into five parts. The introduction mainly focuses on the origin of the study, the significance of the topic, the academic review and the research methods and innovation. How to understand the important influence of cyberspace on the law of the real society, this is the cause of this study. The helplessness and embarrassment produced in the study is the motive source of further research. The legal analysis of cyberspace has very important theoretical and practical significance. As far as the theoretical significance is concerned, the theoretical generalization and Reflection on the legal meaning of the network space question can help people to understand and understand the network space from different perspectives. To promote the development of the field of jurisprudence and the reform of the research paradigm, the rise and establishment of a new branch of "network jurisprudence" can be promoted. In terms of practical significance, the legal analysis of cyberspace can effectively guide the choice of the Chinese cyberspace legislative model and the practical solution of the new problems of Cyberspace Law. Decide.
The first chapter explains the rise of cyberspace from three aspects of the definition, characteristics and social influence of cyberspace. The cyberspace is the product of information technology, but it is not only a technical space, but also a virtual, anonymous, open, non central power, instant and global social space. It has gradually changed the way of human existence, the economic model, the political structure and the social life to bring the human society to an unprecedented situation.
The second chapter of the basic legal problems of cyberspace consists of four sections. First, through the analysis of five typical network legal cases, this paper presents the legal challenges brought by cyberspace, and points out that the change and influence of cyberspace on the law are all directional and profound. Secondly, the legal attributes of cyberspace are defined. After some theories, it is pointed out that cyberspace is a new space for the adjustment of law. In this new field of adjustment which is quite different from the real society, the law must change the existing rules and change the theory of self to adapt to its development. Secondly, the legal relationship of cyberspace is analyzed. It is pointed out that the main body of the legal relationship is presented in the cyberspace. The characteristics of pluralism and complexity make the subject of legal relations difficult to determine, and the subject of legal relations has a breakthrough compared with the real society; from the body to the invisible, from the reality to the virtual object, the object of the legal relationship is expanded and extended in the cyberspace; the new rights and obligations are constantly emerging and the rights and obligations are not. Balance is a new feature of the content of legal relationship. Finally, the article analyzes the legal responsibility of cyberspace, and starts with the legal responsibility investigation of cyberspace, and points out that the legal responsibility is often "lost" in the cyberspace; the legal responsibility of the various subjects in the cyberspace is facing the new circumstances and possibilities; the law of the cyberspace. The kind of legal liability is summed up, and it is pointed out that the legal responsibility of setting public law in cyberspace should be prudent, while the legal responsibility of the nature of private law can be broken through. In a word, on the theoretical level, we can find out that a series of new problems in the network space have begun to gradually come into being. Breaking through the legal theory of the existing society is in the difficult development and evolution.
The third chapter is the legal value of cyberspace. The cyberspace is a new space for the adjustment of the law, but it is not a subversion to the real society. It still inherits the basic legal value of the real society. It is the meaning of order, equality, benefit, freedom and justice, but it also opens the new connotation of the legal value of the cyberspace in the self specificity. Sharing and democracy have become the new spiritual direction of Cyberspace Law. Under the new value guidance, the law of human society also completes the improvement of quality and the evolution of self in the cyberspace.
The fourth chapter is the rise and establishment of "network jurisprudence". First, it analyzes and explains the background of the rise of "network jurisprudence". The discussion of the new social field, such as the information technology form and the open network space, not only involves the research of economics, sociology, culture and so on, but also has penetrated into the scope of the study of law. The weakness makes the legal research of cyberspace difficult. The rise of "network jurisprudence" is the inevitable trend of the research and the refinement of the subject. Secondly, the definition of the concept of "network jurisprudence" is a theoretical jurisprudence, which is a jurisprudence, which is the subject of the general question of Cyberspace Law and the general question. Then this article explains the theoretical source of "network jurisprudence". The theory of network survival and the theory of network society can provide the basis for philosophy and sociology. The theory of network ethics can provide reference for its development and path. Finally, this paper simply explains the research content of "network jurisprudence". In this way, it is pointed out that a variety of research methods are adopted to define the basic concepts in "network jurisprudence", to analyze the principles and values and to clarify the relationship between "network jurisprudence" and other disciplines as an important component of the research content.
In the concluding part, the article points out that the hidden path behind the legal analysis of cyberspace is the technology building society and the society changing the law. In the field of law sociology, the technological change is like the dark current, but it can arouse the waves of the law change at the social rule level. The rise of the network technology must change the law rules of the human society, which is not possible. The trend of reversal, what we can do, is to face the head and study carefully. "Network jurisprudence" studies the laws of the continuous network space and will eventually achieve fruitful results.
In this paper, the legal analysis of cyberspace is completed from three levels. The reflection on the theoretical level is an analysis of the basic legal problems of cyberspace. Cyberspace is a new place for human society with a unique feature. It works with other meaningful spaces together to form the multidimensional existence of human beings. The legal customs of Cyberspace The evolution of the system has taken place different from the real society. Its changes impel the legal theory of the existing society, promote the continuous development of the legal theory and improve the self. The pursuit of the spiritual dimension is the legal value of the cyberspace, the basic legal value of the existing society and the new value spirit are intertwined and compatible, and the network guides the network together. The development of space law; the construction of the research system is the rise and establishment of "network jurisprudence". Although the legal analysis of cyberspace has an important role to be ignored, it is necessary to grasp the essence, significance, expression, value orientation and future development of Cyberspace Law. "Learning" is a scientific study of it.
On the basis of the necessary combing and explaining the relevant legal theory of cyberspace, this article focuses on the fields that others have studied less or have not yet studied, and tries to make some original research and try to put forward some new views. The change of the subject, object and content in the cyberspace, points out that its legal theory elements have broken through the traditional theory of the real society, and it is imperative to develop the new legal theory and enrich the existing legal system based on the network space. Two is to explain the new connotation of the legal value of the cyberspace. To enjoy, the emergence of democratic value is the characteristic of cyberspace and the inevitable trend of the development of human legal value. Three is the concept of "network jurisprudence". Although "network jurisprudence" is still very astringent, its own research system is still in construction, but with the growing of network space, it will grow up. As an important branch of jurisprudence, it plays an active role in the network legal world.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣云立;從婚姻契約論角度談“網(wǎng)婚”問(wèn)題[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 趙興宏,毛牧然,冷秀麗;網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)發(fā)展與立法適時(shí)跟進(jìn)[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

3 李紅;網(wǎng)絡(luò)域名的法律問(wèn)題及其對(duì)策[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年04期

4 張楚;關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)法基本問(wèn)題的闡釋[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

5 孫尚鴻;;傳統(tǒng)管轄規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)背景下所面臨的沖擊與挑戰(zhàn)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2008年04期

6 朱娟;;作為自發(fā)秩序的“人肉搜索”——哈耶克二元社會(huì)秩序觀的進(jìn)路[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年01期

7 閆巧麗;周世祥;;對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)發(fā)展的倫理思考[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

8 王海英;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)立法的價(jià)值取向[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

9 馮文生;Internet 侵權(quán)案件的司法管轄和法律適用[J];法律適用;1998年09期

10 朱萍;虛擬空間管轄權(quán)的確定——美國(guó)和歐盟實(shí)踐的啟示[J];法商研究;2002年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 崔子修;網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的社會(huì)哲學(xué)分析[D];中共中央黨校;2004年

2 段偉文;網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的倫理基礎(chǔ)[D];中國(guó)人民大學(xué);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1968375