本文選題：舊過失論 + 新過失論��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2009年博士論文

【摘要】： 犯罪過失理論是日本20世紀(jì)刑法學(xué)中探討最為熱烈的領(lǐng)域,在舊過失論之后,又提出了新過失論、新新過失論。目前的通說是新過失論。三大過失論圍繞著預(yù)見可能性和結(jié)果避免義務(wù)這兩個(gè)核心問題展開激烈爭(zhēng)論。其結(jié)果是,具體的預(yù)見可能性被一定程度的抽象化,在過失的認(rèn)定順序上,強(qiáng)調(diào)從確定結(jié)果避免義務(wù)出發(fā)再探討預(yù)見可能性問題。以結(jié)果避免義務(wù)為中心,使得犯罪過失不再是責(zé)任要素,而是構(gòu)成要件要素。犯罪過失地位的變化蘊(yùn)涵著架空責(zé)任論和否定三段式犯罪論的危險(xiǎn)。追究犯罪過失責(zé)任原則上以法律規(guī)定為限,但由于結(jié)果避免義務(wù)是行動(dòng)基準(zhǔn),犯罪過失責(zé)任正在擴(kuò)大化。尤其監(jiān)督過失理論使得追究監(jiān)督者過失責(zé)任更加容易。限制過失責(zé)任和監(jiān)督過失責(zé)任的理論是容許的危險(xiǎn)理論以及在其基礎(chǔ)上形成的信賴原則。 我國(guó)目前的舊過失論立場(chǎng),不僅難以應(yīng)對(duì)過失犯罪的狀況,也難以直接引進(jìn)日本的通說新過失論,因此必須修改犯罪過失的法律規(guī)定。在此基礎(chǔ)上,我國(guó)借鑒日本犯罪過失論是可能的。借鑒日本新過失論之外,我國(guó)也具備了在一定范圍內(nèi)適用信賴原則的條件。另外,鑒于我國(guó)的過失犯罪狀況,迫切需要及時(shí)引進(jìn)監(jiān)督過失理論,堅(jiān)決追究監(jiān)督者的過失責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:The theory of criminal negligence is one of the hottest fields in Japanese criminal jurisprudence in the 20th century. After the old theory of negligence, the theory of new fault and new theory of fault are put forward. The current theory is the new fault theory. The theory of three gross negligence focuses on the two core issues of the possibility of foresight and the obligation of avoidance of result. The result is that the specific possibility of foresight is abstracted to a certain extent, and in the order of fault determination, it is emphasized to discuss the possibility of foresight from the perspective of the obligation to avoid the result. Taking the duty of avoidance of result as the center, the criminal negligence is no longer the element of responsibility, but the element of constitution. The change of the position of criminal negligence implies the danger of the theory of overhead liability and the negation of the theory of three-paragraph crime. In principle, the liability for criminal negligence is limited by law, but as the obligation of avoidance of result is the benchmark of action, the liability for criminal negligence is being expanded. In particular, the theory of oversight fault makes it easier to investigate the supervisor's fault liability. The theory of limiting fault liability and supervising fault liability is the theory of permissible danger and the principle of trust formed on its basis. Our country's old position of negligence theory is not only difficult to deal with the situation of negligent crime, but also difficult to directly introduce the general theory of negligence in Japan. Therefore, it is necessary to modify the legal provisions of criminal negligence. On this basis, it is possible for our country to draw lessons from Japanese criminal negligence theory. In addition to Japan's new negligence theory, China also has the conditions to apply the principle of trust to a certain extent. In addition, in view of the situation of negligent crime in our country, it is urgent to introduce the theory of supervisory negligence in time and resolutely investigate the fault liability of supervisors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：DD914;D931.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 高巍;;論注意義務(wù)的判斷基準(zhǔn)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

2 王燕莉;唐稷堯;;過失犯罪注意義務(wù)的特點(diǎn)及確定機(jī)制研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 易益典;監(jiān)督過失犯罪論[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

2 蘇雄華;犯罪過失的理論建構(gòu)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王帥鋒;礦難中監(jiān)督過失刑事責(zé)任研究[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

2 馮卉;論監(jiān)督過失的刑事責(zé)任[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

3 盧薇;共同過失犯罪研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年

4 陳舒宇;論普通過失犯罪的注意義務(wù)[D];中南大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1961658