發(fā)布時間：2018-05-28 10:46

  本文選題：信息 + 企業(yè)信用信息��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著信息化時代的到來，人們的市場交易越來越多地體現(xiàn)出時空的延伸和分離。為了交易的成功，，企業(yè)的信用信息迫切需要在市場主體之間快速傳播，信息共享和信息自由成為人們在信息社會里應(yīng)當享有的基本權(quán)利，使得企業(yè)信用信息具有準公共信息的屬性。然而，企業(yè)信用信息作為企業(yè)在社會經(jīng)濟活動中信用狀況的總括反應(yīng)，是其他社會主體了解企業(yè)誠信和信用狀況的基礎(chǔ)，也是社會信用體系建設(shè)的前提�，F(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟是建立在法制基礎(chǔ)上的信用經(jīng)濟,法律體系的建立與完善是信用經(jīng)濟的保障。但是在我國的民事基本法中，企業(yè)信用信息的基本規(guī)范和主要內(nèi)容目前處于立法空白之中，也就是說，企業(yè)信用信息保護并未形成制度化，從而不利于我國的社會信用體系建設(shè)。本文在分析一起不當使用企業(yè)信用信息案例的基礎(chǔ)上，通過解讀企業(yè)信用信息保護的相關(guān)法理及我國企業(yè)信用信息保護的立法現(xiàn)狀，由此明確企業(yè)信用信息保護的基本方向和方法。本文除引言外，正文主要有以下四部分： 第一部分，通過對所選案例的案情、審判情況的回顧與分析，提出本文所要探析的問題：（1）不當或惡意評價企業(yè)信用的行為認定；（2）現(xiàn)有的企業(yè)信用信息保護路徑是否有效合理；（3）如何在完善社會信用體系的過程保護企業(yè)信用信息。 第二部分，對企業(yè)信用信息保護的法理分析。該部分主要通過對“信用”與“信息”法學概念的闡釋與厘清、企業(yè)信用信息的范圍與內(nèi)容的確定及企業(yè)信用信息保護的主體，來確定企業(yè)信用信息保護的法理依據(jù)。 第三部分，運用實證分析法，對案件的判決內(nèi)容進行分析，透過個案分析我國現(xiàn)有法律制度的整體框架，說明我國企業(yè)信用信息保護不足的現(xiàn)狀。法律的不完善預(yù)示著會有“法律風險”產(chǎn)生，這就需要不斷完善法律以解決法律滯后性帶來的社會危機。 第四部分，我國企業(yè)信用信息民法保護的制度構(gòu)建。在總結(jié)前三部分的基礎(chǔ)上，筆者提出建立我國企業(yè)信用信息保護的架構(gòu)應(yīng)從信用信息的保護原則、主體的權(quán)利內(nèi)容以及相應(yīng)的制度選擇等方面考慮。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of information age, people's market transactions more and more reflect the extension and separation of time and space. For the success of the transaction, the credit information of the enterprise urgently needs to be spread rapidly among the market subjects. The sharing of information and the freedom of information become the basic rights that people should enjoy in the information society. Make enterprise credit information have the attribute of quasi-public information. However, as an overall response to the credit status of enterprises in social and economic activities, enterprise credit information is the basis for other social subjects to understand the credit status of enterprises and the premise of the construction of social credit system. The modern market economy is a credit economy based on the legal system, and the establishment and perfection of the legal system is the guarantee of the credit economy. However, in the basic civil law of our country, the basic norms and main contents of enterprise credit information are currently in the legislative blank, that is to say, the protection of enterprise credit information has not been institutionalized. This is not conducive to the construction of our social credit system. On the basis of analyzing a case of improper use of enterprise credit information, this paper analyzes the relevant legal principles of enterprise credit information protection and the legislative status of enterprise credit information protection in China. From this clear enterprise credit information protection basic direction and method. In addition to the introduction, the main body of this paper has the following four parts: In the first part, through the review and analysis of the merits of the selected cases and the trial situation, This paper puts forward the question of how to protect the enterprise credit information in the process of perfecting the social credit system by using the problem of "1") improper or maliciously appraising the behavior of enterprise credit. (2) whether the existing path of enterprise credit information protection is effective, reasonable and reasonable. (3) how to protect the enterprise credit information in the process of perfecting the social credit system. The second part, the legal theory analysis of the enterprise credit information protection. This part mainly defines the legal basis of enterprise credit information protection by explaining and clarifying the legal concepts of "credit" and "information", determining the scope and content of enterprise credit information and the main body of enterprise credit information protection. The third part uses the empirical analysis method to analyze the judgment content of the case, through the case analysis our country existing legal system overall frame, explains our country enterprise credit information protection insufficiency present situation. The imperfection of law indicates that there will be "legal risk", which needs to improve the law to solve the social crisis caused by the lag of law. The fourth part, our country enterprise credit information civil law protection system construction. On the basis of summing up the first three parts, the author puts forward that the establishment of the framework of the enterprise credit information protection in our country should be considered from the aspects of the protection principle of the credit information, the content of the subject's rights and the corresponding system selection, etc.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D920.5;D922.294;D922.28

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李明發(fā);;信用制度的民事法律保障機制研究[J];安徽大學學報;2006年06期

2 王利明;;再論人格權(quán)的獨立成編[J];法商研究;2012年01期

3 周悅麗;;個人信用信息的法律保護研究[J];法學雜志;2007年04期

4 張新寶;;中國民法和民法學的現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];法學評論;2011年03期

5 吳漢東;論信用權(quán)[J];法學;2001年01期

6 李長健;伍文輝;;信用經(jīng)濟及其實踐理性[J];發(fā)展;2006年04期

7 徐志軍;周悅麗;;個人信用信息數(shù)據(jù)庫在我國征信體系構(gòu)建中的法律定位分析[J];河北法學;2008年01期

8 郭奕;;企業(yè)信用征信與商業(yè)秘密保護[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2008年02期

9 李建文;;信用信息主體權(quán)益及其保障制度研究[J];金融發(fā)展研究;2010年09期

10 石新中;;論信用信息公開[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期

本文編號：1946410