發(fā)布時間：2018-05-28 03:27

  本文選題：協(xié)商制度 + 判決協(xié)商�。� 參考：《中國政法大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： ?德國于上世紀70年代在刑事訴訟中引入了協(xié)商制度,但該制度在很長一段時間內(nèi)都僅僅以非正式的形式存在。近年來,德國立法者試圖通過立法來加強對非正式協(xié)商制度的規(guī)制,使協(xié)商制度有明確的法律依據(jù)可循。最終于2009年8月正式通過了關(guān)于協(xié)商制度的刑事訴訟法修正案。本文從德國協(xié)商制度發(fā)展過程中出現(xiàn)的問題出發(fā),結(jié)合德國聯(lián)邦最高法院的相關(guān)判例及聯(lián)邦議院關(guān)于刑事訴訟法的最新的立法修正案,來闡釋協(xié)商制度在德國刑事訴訟中的運作模式及相關(guān)程序性規(guī)定,并從功能比較的視角出發(fā),比較了德國的協(xié)商制度與美國的辯訴交易,以期為我國的刑事訴訟程序的改革提供借鑒。 本文共分為以下幾個部分: 第一部分簡要介紹協(xié)商制度在德國的發(fā)展歷程并對協(xié)商制度概念進行限定,將其限定在判決協(xié)商,而不包括起訴協(xié)商。 第二部分詳細闡述協(xié)商制度在德國的源起和發(fā)展,重點分析源起和發(fā)展背后的社會成因以及協(xié)商制度中各方當事人的利益要求。 第三部分為本文的重點部分,結(jié)合德國刑事訴訟法修正案及相關(guān)判例和法典評論來分析協(xié)商制度的立法規(guī)制和具體的規(guī)定。 第四部分主要論述協(xié)商制度在德國的一些理論爭議,包括對刑事司法原則的沖擊和在協(xié)商實踐中可能出現(xiàn)的爭論點,并對協(xié)商制度在德國的未來趨勢作出展望。 第五部分將德國的協(xié)商制度與美國的辯訴交易以比較法上之功能比較的視角作出對比。 第六部分論及協(xié)商制度與我國刑事司法中的形勢政策和刑事司法的關(guān)系。 第七部分結(jié)合德國刑事訴訟中協(xié)商制度的立法經(jīng)驗來論述其對我國刑事司法的借鑒意義,重點闡述了協(xié)商制度與我國現(xiàn)行的相關(guān)制度對接的可能性。 最后得出本文結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:? Germany introduced the system of consultation in criminal proceedings in the 1970s, but the system existed only in informal form for a long time. In recent years, German legislators try to strengthen the regulation of informal consultation system through legislation, so that the consultation system has a clear legal basis. Finally, in August 2009, the formal adoption of the consultation system of the Criminal procedure Law amendments. Starting from the problems in the development of the German consultation system, this paper combines the relevant jurisprudence of the German Federal Supreme Court and the latest legislative amendments of the Bundestag on the criminal procedure law. To explain the operating mode and related procedural provisions of the negotiation system in German criminal proceedings, and to compare the German negotiation system with the plea bargaining system of the United States from the perspective of functional comparison. In order to provide reference for the reform of criminal procedure in our country. This paper is divided into the following parts: The first part briefly introduces the development of negotiation system in Germany and limits the concept of negotiation system, which is limited to judgment negotiation, not prosecution negotiation. The second part elaborates the origin and development of the consultation system in Germany, focusing on the social causes behind the origin and development of the consultation system and the interests of the parties involved in the consultation system. The third part is the key part of this paper, combined with the amendment of German Criminal procedure Law and relevant jurisprudence and code comments to analyze the legislative regulations and specific provisions of the consultation system. The fourth part mainly discusses some theoretical disputes of the consultation system in Germany, including the impact on the criminal justice principle and the possible issues in the negotiation practice, and the prospect of the future trend of the consultation system in Germany. In the fifth part, the author compares German negotiation system with American plea bargaining from the perspective of functional comparison in comparative law. The sixth part deals with the relationship between the consultation system and the situation, policy and criminal justice in China's criminal justice. In the seventh part, the author discusses the significance of the consultation system in the criminal procedure of Germany, focusing on the possibility of the connection between the consultation system and the related system in our country. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is drawn.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D951.6;DD915.3

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 董健君;被告人認罪問題研究[D];中國政法大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1945073