本文選題：正當防衛(wèi) + 自我防衛(wèi)��； 參考：《中國青年政治學院》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 近年來,隨著中國刑法理論研究的不斷深入,學術界對德國等大陸法系國家的刑法進行了越來越多的研究。而對英美法系國家的刑法研究則相對較少。在刑法理論中,正當防衛(wèi)的理論具有濃厚的文化底蘊,與一個民族的文化歷史背景息息相關。因此,本文借這一主題,通過分析、歸納、比較的研究方法,對美國刑法理論中的正當防衛(wèi)進行了系統(tǒng)的梳理和分析,以期能為國內(nèi)美國刑法正當防衛(wèi)的研究提供相關的資料。 本文以《模范刑法典》以及四部州刑法典中的正當防衛(wèi)的內(nèi)容為中心,以“法條考察——理論學說”為主線,對美國現(xiàn)行刑法中的正當防衛(wèi)理論進行考察,以期概括出美國刑法正當防衛(wèi)的特點以及其對中國刑法正當防衛(wèi)的可借鑒之處。 本文除引言外,共四章,總字數(shù)為四萬七千余字((包括腳注五千余字)。第一部分為引言。概述了美國刑法中正當防衛(wèi)的性質(zhì)、地位并對其種類做了重新界定,為下文的論述作了鋪墊。 第二部分為自我防衛(wèi)。在考察五部制定法的基礎上,詳細研究了自我防衛(wèi)的構(gòu)成要件、有關自我防衛(wèi)的理論學說以及合理性、不完美自我防衛(wèi)等熱點問題。 第三部分為防衛(wèi)他人。在考察五部制定法的基礎上,詳細研究了防衛(wèi)他人的歷史沿革與認識錯誤、墮胎等熱點問題。 第四部分為防衛(wèi)財產(chǎn)與防衛(wèi)住宅。在考察五部制定法的基礎上,筆者對這一防衛(wèi)類型的內(nèi)涵、構(gòu)成要件以及彈簧槍的使用等熱點問題進行了研究。 第五部分為中美刑法正當防衛(wèi)的比較。筆者從該制度在刑法體系中的地位、種類、保護的法益范圍、防衛(wèi)裝置、逆防衛(wèi)等方面進行比較,概括出美國刑法正當防衛(wèi)的特點以及其對中國刑法正當防衛(wèi)的可借鑒之處。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of the theory of criminal law in China, more and more researches have been carried out on the criminal law of civil law countries such as Germany. However, the research on the criminal law of common law countries is relatively few. In the theory of criminal law, the theory of justifiable defense has strong cultural background, which is closely related to the cultural and historical background of a nation. Therefore, this paper, through the analysis, induction and comparison of the research methods, systematically combs and analyzes the justifiable defense in the theory of American criminal law, in order to provide relevant information for the study of the legitimate defense of the American criminal law in China. This paper focuses on the contents of the Model Criminal Code and the self-defense in the four state criminal codes, and takes "the investigation of the articles of Law-the Theory of Theory" as the main line to investigate the theory of justifiable defense in the current criminal law of the United States. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the characteristics of the legitimate defense of American criminal law and its reference to the legitimate defense of Chinese criminal law. In addition to the introduction, this paper consists of four chapters, with a total of more than 47000 words (including more than 5, 000 footnotes). The first part is the introduction. This paper summarizes the nature and status of justifiable defense in American criminal law, and redefines its types, which pave the way for the following discussion. The second part is self-defense. Based on the investigation of the five laws, this paper studies in detail the constitutive elements of self-defense, the theory of self-defense, the rationality and imperfect self-defense and other hot issues. The third part is the defense of others. On the basis of the investigation of the five laws, this paper studies in detail the historical evolution, cognitive errors, abortion and other hot issues of defending others. The fourth part is the defense property and the defense house. On the basis of the investigation of the five-part formulation method, the author studies the intension of this defense type, the constitutive elements and the use of the spring gun, and so on. The fifth part is the comparison of legitimate defense between Chinese and American criminal law. The author compares the position, type, scope of legal interests of protection, defense device and inverse defense of the system in the criminal law system, and generalizes the characteristics of the legitimate defense of American criminal law and its reference to the legitimate defense of Chinese criminal law.
【學位授予單位】：中國青年政治學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：DD914;D971.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 賴早興;;美國犯罪成立要件與證明責任分配[J];法學家;2007年03期

2 王海橋;馬淵杰;;對正當防衛(wèi)適用中兩點困惑的思考[J];中國檢察官;2008年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王國賓;正當防衛(wèi)疑難問題論要[D];吉林大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1934427