本文選題：法律家長(zhǎng)主義 + 干預(yù)��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 法律家長(zhǎng)主義意味著政府對(duì)公民強(qiáng)制的愛。它是在尊重人格平等的基礎(chǔ)上,為解決現(xiàn)代人所面臨的不公平、不平等的困境,為增進(jìn)公民福利和社會(huì)公共利益而產(chǎn)生的一種法學(xué)思潮。隨著西方自由資本主義向國(guó)家資本主義的過(guò)渡,政府的職能從經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域擴(kuò)大到法律領(lǐng)域,從政府操縱市場(chǎng)過(guò)渡到政府限制個(gè)人權(quán)利。正是在這樣一個(gè)建立在發(fā)達(dá)的市場(chǎng)商品經(jīng)濟(jì)的基礎(chǔ)上,以民族國(guó)家為載體,福利國(guó)家為目標(biāo),強(qiáng)調(diào)理性主義和民主法治為趨勢(shì)的現(xiàn)代社會(huì),為法律家長(zhǎng)主義的產(chǎn)生與興起提供了一個(gè)現(xiàn)實(shí)的社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)。 在考慮中國(guó)歷史文化傳統(tǒng)、現(xiàn)狀、福利國(guó)的影響和現(xiàn)行憲法規(guī)范的前提下,在某些領(lǐng)域以法律家長(zhǎng)主義作為立法原則是正當(dāng)和可行的。我國(guó)正處在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,如果脫離政府主導(dǎo),單憑社會(huì)規(guī)范來(lái)推進(jìn)法治,勢(shì)必會(huì)延緩這一進(jìn)程的實(shí)現(xiàn),更會(huì)使各種矛盾沖突激化,從而導(dǎo)致耗費(fèi)過(guò)多社會(huì)資源。因此,在政府的引導(dǎo)下推進(jìn)法治是中國(guó)法治建設(shè)的現(xiàn)實(shí)選擇,這也使法律家長(zhǎng)主義在我國(guó)的應(yīng)用有較之西方更大的空間。 針對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)情“寬容的干預(yù)”具有一定的必要性,與中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)倫理親情觀相結(jié)合的法律家長(zhǎng)主義應(yīng)從社會(huì)公共利益與個(gè)人利益的區(qū)分與平衡入手,通過(guò)以社會(huì)公共利益為立場(chǎng)的社會(huì)法的調(diào)節(jié)方式,構(gòu)建經(jīng)濟(jì)法,反壟斷法等社會(huì)法的制度框架,確立法的利益協(xié)調(diào)和政策協(xié)調(diào)原則。我們應(yīng)當(dāng)以法律對(duì)權(quán)力的態(tài)度、立場(chǎng)以及傳統(tǒng)文化賦予法律的內(nèi)在品格為基礎(chǔ),實(shí)現(xiàn)法律中立性控制、市場(chǎng)自行性調(diào)節(jié)、政府政策性平衡這三方面的和諧。
[Abstract]:Legal paternalism means the government's compulsory love for citizens. It is a kind of ideological trend of law, which is based on respecting the equality of personality, solving the predicament of inequity and inequality faced by modern people, and promoting the welfare of citizens and the public interests of society. With the transition of western liberal capitalism to state capitalism, the function of government extends from economic field to legal field, from government manipulating the market to restricting individual rights. It is precisely in such a modern society, which is based on a developed market commodity economy, with a nation-state as its carrier, a welfare state as its target, and an emphasis on rationalism and democracy and the rule of law as its trend. It provides a realistic social foundation for the emergence and rise of legal paternalism. On the premise of considering Chinese historical and cultural tradition, present situation, influence of welfare state and current constitutional norms, it is reasonable and feasible to take legal paternalism as legislative principle in some fields. Our country is in the critical period of social transformation. If we break away from the government and push the rule of law by social norms alone, it will delay the realization of this process, intensify all kinds of contradictions and conflicts, and lead to excessive consumption of social resources. Therefore, promoting the rule of law under the guidance of the government is a realistic choice for the construction of the rule of law in China, which also makes the application of legal paternalism in our country greater than that in the West. According to the situation of our country, "tolerant intervention" is necessary. The legal paternalism combined with Chinese traditional ethics and kinship should start with the distinction and balance between the social public interest and the individual interest. Through the regulation of social law based on the social public interest, this paper constructs the institutional framework of social law, such as economic law, anti-monopoly law and so on, and establishes the principles of interest coordination and policy coordination of law. On the basis of the attitude and position of law to power and the inherent character of law given by traditional culture, we should realize the harmony of law neutrality control, market self-regulation and government policy balance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D909.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張穩(wěn)穩(wěn);法律家長(zhǎng)主義研究中的利益問(wèn)題與能力問(wèn)題[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 李雄;法律家父主義對(duì)自我決定權(quán)的限制及其界限[D];南京大學(xué);2012年

3 孫騫;法律家長(zhǎng)主義及其邊界[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1931629