本文選題：漢代 + 家庭關(guān)系��； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2009年博士論文

【摘要】： 本文以漢代家庭法為研究對(duì)象,希望通過(guò)對(duì)漢律中調(diào)整家庭關(guān)系的條文和漢代家庭關(guān)系實(shí)態(tài)的考察,歸納出漢代家庭法的立法宗旨和時(shí)代特點(diǎn),也試圖通過(guò)對(duì)傳世文獻(xiàn)和出土文獻(xiàn)材料的爬梳、考辨,對(duì)學(xué)界一些素有爭(zhēng)議的問(wèn)題表述一孔之見(jiàn)。 本文的內(nèi)容大致可分為四部分。 第一部分是對(duì)漢及漢以前的家庭法進(jìn)行回顧。本部分首先簡(jiǎn)要回顧漢以前的家庭法狀況,再?gòu)臐h代家庭法的淵源和理念入手,對(duì)漢代家庭法的基本狀況進(jìn)行梳理。 第二部分是對(duì)漢代家庭法的重要概念——“同居”的含義進(jìn)行考訂。圍繞著漢代“同居”的含義,學(xué)界歷來(lái)存在以下幾個(gè)爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn):一是“同居”是否需要具備“同籍”、“同財(cái)”兩個(gè)要件,二是“同居”是否包括父母及妻子等最近層直系親屬,三是“同居”是否包括奴婢。本部分圍繞以上幾個(gè)爭(zhēng)論焦點(diǎn),利用張家山漢簡(jiǎn)和里耶秦簡(jiǎn)等相關(guān)新材料對(duì)漢代“同居”概念進(jìn)行考訂。此外,本部分還通過(guò)對(duì)“坐隸,隸不坐戶”律文的考釋,揭示了主奴法律地位的真實(shí)狀況。 第三部分是對(duì)調(diào)整漢代家庭關(guān)系的刑事法律規(guī)范進(jìn)行探討。本部分探討了漢代家庭犯罪及其刑罰、家庭成員間的刑事連帶責(zé)任、子女對(duì)父母的告發(fā)權(quán)與訴權(quán)等問(wèn)題。其中,家庭犯罪及其刑罰方面,重點(diǎn)論述了“不孝”罪是否包括告發(fā)父母和殺害父母行為;家庭成員間的刑事連帶責(zé)任方面,則闡述了減免家庭成員連帶責(zé)任的條件與途徑,同時(shí)通過(guò)對(duì)《收律》中“除及論”的辨析,說(shuō)明了夫妻于連帶責(zé)任上的差異。在子女對(duì)父母的告發(fā)權(quán)與訴權(quán)方面,區(qū)分了子女“告”父母的絕對(duì)限制與相對(duì)限制。 第四部分是對(duì)調(diào)整漢代家庭關(guān)系的民事法律規(guī)范進(jìn)行考察。本部分的內(nèi)容涉及了漢初法律所認(rèn)定的非法婚姻類型、漢代妻子的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)、妾和贅婿的地位、家庭成員繼承權(quán)益的差異及其原因等問(wèn)題。本文通過(guò)對(duì)以上四部分內(nèi)容的研究,一方面,總結(jié)出漢代家庭法的立法宗旨為:要求家庭關(guān)系服從國(guó)家政治利益、維護(hù)家庭的和諧穩(wěn)定、規(guī)范家庭內(nèi)部的尊卑秩序。另一方面,歸納出漢代家庭法與唐代家庭法相比的時(shí)代特點(diǎn)。如,女性在家庭中的法權(quán)地位較高;身份、等級(jí)界限不明顯,家長(zhǎng)權(quán)相對(duì)薄弱等等。
[Abstract]:This article, taking the family law of the Han Dynasty as the research object, hopes to conclude the legislative purpose and characteristics of the family law in the Han Dynasty through the provisions of the adjustment of the family relations in the Han Dynasty and the actual state of the family relations in the Han Dynasty. See you.
The content of this article can be divided into four parts.
The first part is a review of the family law before the Han and Han Dynasties. This part first briefly reviews the status of family law before the Han Dynasty, and then starts with the origin and concept of the family law in the Han Dynasty, and combs the basic situation of the family law in the Han Dynasty.
The second part is an important concept of the family law of the Han Dynasty - the meaning of "cohabitation". Around the meaning of "cohabitation" in the Han Dynasty, there have always been the following controversies in the academic circles: one is whether "cohabitation" needs two important elements of "cohabitation", "cohabitation", "cohabitation", and the other is whether "cohabitation" includes parents and wives, etc. The three is whether the "cohabitation" includes slaves or not. In this part, the concept of "cohabitation" in the Han Dynasty is examined by using the new materials such as Zhang Jiashan Han bamboo slips and Liye Qin bamboo slips. In addition, this part also reveals the real status of the legal status of the slaves by the examination and interpretation of the law of "sitting in the Li and not sitting in the household".
The third part is to discuss the criminal legal norms of the family relationship adjustment in the Han Dynasty. This part discusses the family crime and its penalty in the Han Dynasty, the criminal joint liability between the family members, the children's right to complain to the parents and the right of appeal. Among them, the family crime and its penalty, the emphasis is on whether the crime of "unfilial filial" includes the father of the report. In the aspect of the criminal joint responsibility between the family members and the family members, the conditions and ways of reducing the joint liability of the family members are expounded. At the same time, the differences in the joint and several liability are explained by the discrimination between the "elimination and the theory" in the law. Absolute and relative restrictions.
The fourth part is the investigation of the civil legal norms regulating the family relations of the Han Dynasty. The contents of this part include the types of illegal marriage identified by the law of the early Han Dynasty, the property rights of the wife of the Han Dynasty, the status of concubines and son-in-law, the differences in the inheritance rights of the family members and their reasons. This article through the study of the above four parts, On the other hand, the legislative purpose of the family law in the Han Dynasty is to require family relations to obey the political interests of the state, maintain the harmony and stability of the family and standardize the order of inferiority in the family. On the other hand, the characteristics of the times of the family law in the Han Dynasty and the family law of the Tang Dynasty are summarized. Obviously, parents' rights are relatively weak, and so on.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D929;D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳榮曾;對(duì)春秋戰(zhàn)國(guó)家長(zhǎng)制奴隸制殘余的考察[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年02期

2 蔣非非;秦代謫戍、贅婿、閭左新考[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年05期

3 張世超;秦簡(jiǎn)中的“同居”與有關(guān)法律[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);1989年03期

4 王彥輝;從張家山漢簡(jiǎn)看西漢時(shí)期私奴婢的社會(huì)地位[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

5 華友根;西漢的禮法結(jié)合及其在中國(guó)法律史上的地位[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年06期

6 何勤華;《法經(jīng)》新考[J];法學(xué);1998年02期

7 魯家亮;;試論張家山漢簡(jiǎn)《收律》及其相關(guān)的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2007年02期

8 于振波;從“公室告”與“家罪”看秦律的立法精神[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

9 徐世虹;;秦漢簡(jiǎn)牘中的不孝罪訴訟[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

10 閆曉君;;論張家山漢簡(jiǎn)《收律》[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1888550