本文選題：E-Government + 電子政府�。� 參考：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：摘要：今年是美國2002年電子政務(wù)法頒布之后第11個年頭。短短的11年問,世界經(jīng)濟(jì)飛速發(fā)展,我國電子政務(wù)也算是飛速發(fā)展了,現(xiàn)在很多政府部門、事業(yè)單位也脫離了傳統(tǒng)的“計算機辦公+紙質(zhì)辦公”也在開始使用網(wǎng)絡(luò)辦公,和企業(yè)所用的“OA”系統(tǒng),可以這么說,信息技術(shù)發(fā)展造就了電子生活、我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化、生活等方方面面已經(jīng)離不開這種特殊的空間——“電子空間”。電子商務(wù)的飛速、蓬勃發(fā)展,同時也使孕育了我們的政府及其政務(wù)的新生及發(fā)展。對于電子生活、電子商務(wù)方面的法律,國內(nèi)已經(jīng)有諸多專家、學(xué)者進(jìn)行研究,但對于電子政務(wù)法的問題,還需要投入更多的人力物力去進(jìn)行研究、還需要更多地法律人奉獻(xiàn)至此。這就是本文的意義所在。 電子政務(wù)法(亦稱電子政府法。美國E-Government Act of2002直接翻譯的意思是電子政府法。但是我們國內(nèi)目前普遍將之稱為電子政務(wù)法)作為我國法律體系中的一個新的組成部分,在中國乃至世界范圍內(nèi),研究歷史也只有短短的幾十年。加上由于電子政務(wù)活動的發(fā)展變化異常迅速,當(dāng)前世界范圍內(nèi),相關(guān)法律也較新較少,而傳統(tǒng)政府管理型工作已經(jīng)不能完全掌握瞬息萬變的網(wǎng)絡(luò)生活的主導(dǎo)權(quán),因此電子政務(wù)法則顯得相當(dāng)具有研究價值。 目前各國也已經(jīng)開始慢慢重視對電子政務(wù)法的研究。研究成果較多也較為成熟的當(dāng)屬美國,已然成為電子政務(wù)法研究的前沿之地。美國對電子政府的理論研究可謂獨樹一幟。美國研究機構(gòu)主要分為兩類非商業(yè)性質(zhì)的和商業(yè)性質(zhì)的研究機構(gòu)。其中非商業(yè)性質(zhì)的機構(gòu)研究成果由于常常成為指導(dǎo)國家發(fā)展電子政務(wù)的指南而具有重要價值。他們的研究主要是從管理和公共行政的角度展開,探尋電子政務(wù)的本質(zhì)和內(nèi)涵,實施電子政務(wù)的整體規(guī)劃及電子政務(wù)效績管理與評測等重大問題的解決方法。其研究成果數(shù)量之多,成為世界各國電子政務(wù)法研究的前沿之地。 本文主要內(nèi)容是解讀一下美國2002年電子政務(wù)法(E-Government Act of2002)及我國的《電子政務(wù)法(專家討論稿)》,兼作介紹,旨在引進(jìn)美國電子政務(wù)法并探尋其適合我國適用的相應(yīng)措施、通過對比兩國在立法上的異同,對我國未來實施電子政務(wù)法時可能會遇到的問題及相應(yīng)對策提出一點自己的看法。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: this year is the 11 th year after the enactment of the 2002 e-government law in the United States. For a short period of 11 years, with the rapid development of the world economy and the rapid development of e-government in our country, many government departments and institutions are also starting to use network offices without the traditional "computer office paper office". It can be said that the development of information technology has created electronic life, and our economy, politics, culture, life and other aspects have been inseparable from this special space-"electronic space". The rapid and vigorous development of electronic commerce also gives birth to our government and the new development of government affairs. There are already many experts and scholars in China to study the laws of electronic life and electronic commerce. However, we still need to invest more manpower and material resources to study the problems of e-government law. More legal people are needed here. This is the meaning of this paper. E-government law (also known as e-government law). The direct translation of E-Government Act of2002 in the United States means electronic government law. However, we generally call it E-government Law in our country at present) as a new part of our legal system, in China and even in the world, the history of research is only a few decades. In addition, due to the rapid development and change of e-government activities, the relevant laws are relatively new and fewer in the world at present, and the traditional government-managed work has been unable to fully grasp the leading power of the rapidly changing network life. Therefore, the law of e-government appears to have considerable research value. At present, countries have begun to attach importance to the study of e-government law. The more and more mature research results are the United States, which has become the frontier of the research of e-government law. The theoretical study of e-government in the United States is unique. American research institutions are divided into two categories: non-commercial and commercial. Among them, the research results of non-commercial institutions are of great value because they are often used as guidelines to guide the development of e-government. Their research is mainly from the perspective of management and public administration to explore the essence and connotation of e-government, to implement the overall planning of e-government, and to solve the major problems of e-government performance management and evaluation. The number of research results has become the frontier of the research of electronic government law all over the world. The main content of this paper is to interpret the E-Government Act of 2002 (E-Government Act of 2002) and the E-Government Law (expert discussion Paper) of our country, and also to introduce the E-Government Law of the United States and to explore the corresponding measures suitable for our country. By comparing the similarities and differences in legislation between the two countries, this paper puts forward some views on the problems that may be encountered in the implementation of e-government law in China in the future and the corresponding countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.1;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋才發(fā);WTO規(guī)則與中國信息技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展及保護(hù)[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年04期

2 丁慧敏;相天起;;我國電子政務(wù)立法問題淺論[J];河南財政稅務(wù)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年02期

3 劉霞;向良云;;我國公共危機網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理結(jié)構(gòu)——雙重整合機制的構(gòu)建[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2006年03期

4 電子政務(wù)法研究課題組;;中華人民共和國電子政務(wù)法(專家建議稿)[J];電子政務(wù);2009年07期

5 熊茜茜;;關(guān)于我國電子政務(wù)法制建設(shè)環(huán)境的思考[J];湖北檔案;2010年Z1期

6 黃學(xué)賢;行政法中的信賴保護(hù)原則[J];法學(xué);2002年05期

7 劉友華,何振;論電子政務(wù)信息公開與隱私權(quán)沖突之協(xié)調(diào)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年04期

8 齊愛民;中華人民共和國個人信息保護(hù)法示范法草案學(xué)者建議稿[J];河北法學(xué);2005年06期

9 孫敬水;美國電子政府的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗及借鑒[J];科技管理研究;2004年02期

10 蔣錄全,吳瑞明,王浣塵;電子政務(wù)中的政府信息公開[J];情報雜志;2004年04期

，

本文編號：1881297