本文選題：法治 + 實踐過程�。� 參考：《鄭州大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 人類社會的調整規(guī)范體系的發(fā)展過程歷經了宗教、倫理道德、風俗習慣和法律混合的時期。隨著現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展的進程,道德與法律逐漸的分離開來,各有其相對獨立的領域。在現(xiàn)代社會中,與法律相比,曾作為社會主要調整規(guī)范的道德顯露出固有的缺陷,因而道德調整的領域大大縮小,‘而法律的適用領域不斷增加,并逐漸波及社會生活的各個方面,因而現(xiàn)在社會稱之為法治社會。西方古希臘時期亞里士多德就提出“良法”的兩個標準。至此,法律與道德的關系問題就進入了理論與實踐的雙重考量區(qū)域。道德與法律作為兩種最主要的社會調整規(guī)范方式,具有十分豐富的法哲學和倫理學的內涵。一些道德規(guī)范被法律所吸收,一些法律蘊含著道德意蘊。固法律應與道德保持一致。 本文從法治的動態(tài)層面分析法治實踐過程中的道德基礎。第一部分論述立法過程中的道德基礎。立法是法治實踐過程的初始環(huán)節(jié),必須有道德的審度。本文首先解析立法權來源的道德理論基礎,然后分析倫理道德在立法過程中的基礎性作用。第二部分論述執(zhí)法過程中的道德基礎。公正執(zhí)法是社會主義法治的重要過程,執(zhí)法必須要有道德限度,政府誠信是執(zhí)法公正的保障。所以本文從政府的誠信程度著手來論述執(zhí)法的成效,然后試論執(zhí)法主體的倫理責任。第三部分論述司法過程中的道德基礎。懲治罪惡,扶持正義是司法倫理的基本原則,司法機關要充分利用道德評價手段使法治效果更具影響力。第四部分論述守法過程中的道德基礎。遵紀守法是每個公民的最基本義務,社會公德是遵紀守法的基礎,也是遵紀守法的表現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The development of human society's adjustment and regulation system has gone through a period of mixed religion, ethics, custom and law. With the development of modernization, morality and law are gradually separated, each has its relatively independent field. In modern society, compared with the law, the morality, which was the main regulation of the society, has revealed its inherent defects, thus the field of moral adjustment has been greatly reduced, and the application of the law has been increasing. And gradually affected all aspects of social life, so the society is now called the rule of law society. Aristotle put forward two standards of "good law" in ancient Greece. So far, the relationship between law and morality has entered the dual consideration area of theory and practice. As two main ways of social adjustment, morality and law have rich connotations of philosophy of law and ethics. Some moral norms are absorbed by the law, and some laws contain moral implications. Solid law should be consistent with morality. This paper analyzes the moral basis of the practice of the rule of law from the dynamic level of the rule of law. The first part discusses the moral basis in the legislative process. Legislation is the initial process of the practice of rule of law, must have moral evaluation. This paper first analyzes the theoretical basis of the source of legislative power, and then analyzes the basic role of ethics in the legislative process. The second part discusses the moral basis in the process of law enforcement. Just law enforcement is an important process of socialist rule of law, which must have a moral limit, and government honesty is the guarantee of law enforcement justice. Therefore, this paper discusses the effectiveness of law enforcement from the level of government honesty, and then discusses the ethical responsibility of law enforcement subjects. The third part discusses the moral basis in the judicial process. Punishing crime and supporting justice are the basic principles of judicial ethics. Judicial organs should make full use of the means of moral evaluation to make the effect of rule of law more influential. The fourth part discusses the moral basis in the process of abiding by the law. Abiding by law is the most basic duty of every citizen, and social morality is the basis and performance of abiding by law.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D90-053

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉云林;;法律倫理的時代使命:為法治建設提供道德保障[J];道德與文明;2007年04期

2 李建華,徐剛;立法原則的倫理解讀[J];河北法學;2005年06期

3 魏洪秀;當前道德法律化的現(xiàn)實意義[J];黑龍江高教研究;2005年05期

4 李步云;趙迅;;什么是良法[J];法學研究;2005年06期

5 郭金鴻;倫理道德對“法治”的基礎性支持維度[J];齊魯學刊;2003年04期

6 周旺生;論中國立法原則的法律化、制度化[J];法學論壇;2003年03期

7 王海明;公正與人道:以德治國的道德原則體系[J];蘇州鐵道師范學院學報(社會科學版);2002年02期

8 劉星;法律“強制力”觀念的弱化──當代西方法理學的本體論變革[J];外國法譯評;1995年03期

9 孫蘭潔;;略論法律與道德的關系[J];文史博覽(理論);2008年09期

10 鄭傳坤;建設服務型政府與行政執(zhí)法改革[J];行政法學研究;2004年01期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 陽紅光;公安執(zhí)法倫理研究[D];湖南師范大學;2005年

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 王薇;論法治進程中的道德支持[D];南京師范大學;2002年

2 歐元雕;當代中國法治的道德基礎研究[D];南京師范大學;2004年

3 石春金;論法治的道德基礎[D];武漢大學;2005年

4 宋宇;法治視域下的政府誠信之重塑[D];黑龍江大學;2006年

5 朱轉云;司法倫理研究[D];南京師范大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1850492