本文選題：風(fēng)險(xiǎn) + 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隨著全球化與現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程的加快,人類面臨著嶄新的發(fā)展階段,也遭遇更多的現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)�！帮L(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)”最先被一些發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家所認(rèn)識(shí),但風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的存在并不局限于這些國(guó)家,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)無國(guó)界的特征愈發(fā)明顯。2003年SARS風(fēng)暴、2005年松花江水污染事故、2008年三聚氰胺奶粉事件以及各地的群體性沖突等一系列事件都表明:中國(guó)已經(jīng)進(jìn)入風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的高發(fā)期,形形色色的社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與社會(huì)秩序之間劍拔弩張。 由于各地區(qū)現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展不平衡,中國(guó)面臨的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)具有復(fù)合性的特征。與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家相比,處于轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國(guó)面臨的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)更加復(fù)雜多樣,也更容易從可能轉(zhuǎn)化為現(xiàn)實(shí)。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論分析了我們所處的時(shí)代特征,為我們進(jìn)行現(xiàn)代法制建設(shè)提供了獨(dú)特的視角,也為法律制度的制定提供了有益的思路。構(gòu)建一套有效應(yīng)對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的法律治理體系具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文共分為三個(gè)部分: 第一部分從風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的定義入手,分析現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的成因。結(jié)合拉什、貝克、吉登斯等人的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)理論觀點(diǎn),對(duì)目前的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)性闡述,旨在為下文分析我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的現(xiàn)狀及治理提供理論上的依據(jù)和支持。 第二部分通過對(duì)我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的法律實(shí)證分析,總結(jié)我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的特點(diǎn)。文章選取了“松花江污染事件”、“三聚氰胺奶粉事件”、“四川大竹縣群體性事件”三個(gè)具有典型代表意義的例證進(jìn)行分析,從宏觀上對(duì)我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)視角下的法律構(gòu)架進(jìn)行反思,歸納出在法律制定過程中應(yīng)將“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”因素納入考量范圍、注重信息公開和公眾的知情權(quán)。只有認(rèn)識(shí)到我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的獨(dú)特之處,才能針對(duì)其成因制定出合理的應(yīng)對(duì)措施,有效進(jìn)行法律治理。 第三部分是文章的重點(diǎn),分析了中國(guó)法治面臨的雙重任務(wù),既要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)又要規(guī)避風(fēng)險(xiǎn),著重探討了我國(guó)如何通過法律治理來應(yīng)對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的挑戰(zhàn)。在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)制的立法過程中要遵循風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防的相關(guān)原則,將“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”因素納入法律治理的核心考量范圍。通過探索符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)治理模式,建立風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的法律預(yù)防機(jī)制、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)中的處理機(jī)制和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)發(fā)生后的救濟(jì)機(jī)制,形成一套較為完備的法律治理體系。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of globalization and modernization, human beings are facing a new stage of development and more modern risks. "risk society" was first recognized by some developed countries, but the existence of risk is not limited to these countries. The risk without national boundaries has become increasingly apparent. A series of events, such as the 2003 SARS storm, the 2005 Songhua River water pollution accident, the 2008 melamine milk powder incident and the mass conflict around the country, all show that China has entered a period of high risk. All kinds of social risks and social order between tension. Due to the unbalanced development of modernization in various regions, the risks faced by China are complex. China, in transition, faces more complex and diverse risks than developed countries, and is more likely to turn them into reality. The theory of risk society analyzes the characteristics of our times, provides us with a unique perspective for the construction of the modern legal system, and provides a useful way of thinking for the formulation of the legal system. It is of great practical significance to construct a set of effective legal governance system to deal with the risk society. This paper is divided into three parts: The first part analyzes the causes of modern risk society from the definition of risk and risk society. Combined with Rush, Baker, Giddens and others' risk theory, the present risk society theory is systematically expounded in order to provide theoretical basis and support for the following analysis of the present situation and governance of risk society in China. The second part summarizes the characteristics of China's risk society through the legal empirical analysis of our country's risk society. In this paper, three typical examples of "Songhua River pollution incident", "melamine milk powder incident" and "Dazhu County group incident" are selected for analysis. This paper reflects on the legal framework from the macro perspective of our country's risk society, and concludes that the "risk" factor should be taken into consideration in the process of making the law, and the publicity of information and the public's right to know should be emphasized. Only by recognizing the unique features of our country's risk society can we formulate reasonable measures to deal with the causes and effectively carry out legal management. The third part is the focus of the article, which analyzes the dual tasks facing the rule of law in China, not only to develop economy but also to avoid risks, and to discuss how to deal with the challenge of risk society through legal governance in our country. In the legislative process of risk regulation, we should follow the relevant principles of risk prevention and bring the "risk" factor into the core consideration of legal governance. By exploring the risk management model in accordance with the national conditions of our country, establishing the legal prevention mechanism of risk, the handling mechanism of risk and the relief mechanism after the occurrence of risk, a set of relatively complete legal governance system is formed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 范正姝;應(yīng)對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)問題研究[D];南京信息工程大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1842457