本文選題：案例指導(dǎo)制度 + 中國(guó)特色　； 參考：《河北科技大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 建立案例指導(dǎo)制度是最高人民法院針對(duì)我國(guó)司法制度和審判制度存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題所提出的一項(xiàng)重大改革,對(duì)于保障法制統(tǒng)一,提高司法效率,節(jié)約司法資源,提高司法能力,實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正,遏制司法腐敗具有重要意義。最高人民法院在《人民法院第二個(gè)五年改革綱要(2004—2008)》中采用了“案例指導(dǎo)制度”的表述,是一種表達(dá)上的技巧,表明我們的案例指導(dǎo)制度有別于判例法,不是照搬判例法的做法。文字上的處理暫時(shí)擱置了許多爭(zhēng)議,但并沒(méi)有從根本上解決案例指導(dǎo)制度的法律定位問(wèn)題。自上世紀(jì)80年代中期以來(lái),隨著人民法院審判方式改革的提出,以案例指導(dǎo)審判實(shí)踐的學(xué)理探究日益高漲,但時(shí)至今日對(duì)于如何認(rèn)識(shí)指導(dǎo)性案例的內(nèi)涵與效力,都尚未形成統(tǒng)一清晰的思路。 對(duì)案例指導(dǎo)制度的法律地位予以明確,對(duì)指導(dǎo)性案例的效力進(jìn)行定位,是討論案例指導(dǎo)制度全部問(wèn)題的基石和核心。 我國(guó)有著悠久的判例制度傳統(tǒng)。建國(guó)后,最高人民法院和地方各級(jí)人民法院在運(yùn)用案例指導(dǎo)審判工作方面進(jìn)行了許多探索和實(shí)踐,積累了很多寶貴的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。構(gòu)建中國(guó)特色的案例指導(dǎo)制度,應(yīng)當(dāng)借鑒英美法系判例法和大陸法系判例制度的經(jīng)驗(yàn),發(fā)揚(yáng)我國(guó)古代判例制度的傳統(tǒng),吸收我國(guó)法院案例指導(dǎo)的寶貴實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),尤其是有20多年發(fā)布制度的《最高人民法院公報(bào)》的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 誠(chéng)然,建立中國(guó)特色的案例指導(dǎo)制度,涉及到許多觀念、制度甚至體制層面的深層次變革,有許多的障礙性因素需要克服,有許多的相關(guān)理論需要探討,有許多的配套制度需要完善。無(wú)章可循,無(wú)例可鑒,是一項(xiàng)前所未有的事情。案例指導(dǎo)制度要真正實(shí)現(xiàn)其價(jià)值,真正具有生命力,就應(yīng)當(dāng)賦予案例指導(dǎo)制度以司法解釋的法律地位,確認(rèn)指導(dǎo)性案例在司法審判中的拘束力,也唯有此,才能有力地促進(jìn)法律的統(tǒng)一適用,使這一制度得以順利運(yùn)行,真正發(fā)揮其效力。對(duì)案例指導(dǎo)制度予以這樣的定位,符合中國(guó)的國(guó)情,符合中國(guó)的司法實(shí)際,未超越全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)的授權(quán),不僅技術(shù)上可行而且具有立法依據(jù),同時(shí)亦有其他大陸法系國(guó)家的做法可資借鑒。 本文對(duì)我國(guó)古代判例制度傳統(tǒng)進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要考查,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)判例制度中重要人物的思想進(jìn)行了詳述,總結(jié)了人民法院運(yùn)用案例指導(dǎo)審判工作的實(shí)踐,闡述了英美法系判例法與大陸法系判例制度對(duì)我國(guó)案例指導(dǎo)制度的啟示,探討了有關(guān)案例指導(dǎo)制度構(gòu)建中法學(xué)界的理論爭(zhēng)議,對(duì)中國(guó)特色案例指導(dǎo)制度進(jìn)行了初步構(gòu)建設(shè)計(jì)。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the case guidance system is a major reform put forward by the Supreme people's Court in view of the practical problems existing in the judicial system and the judicial system in our country. It can guarantee the unity of the legal system, improve judicial efficiency, save judicial resources, and improve judicial capacity. It is of great significance to realize judicial justice and curb judicial corruption. The expression "case guidance system" was adopted by the Supreme people's Court in the second Five-Year Reform outline of the people's Court (2004-2008), which is a technique of expression and shows that our case guidance system is different from case law. It is not the practice of copying case law. The written processing has temporarily shelved many disputes, but has not fundamentally resolved the legal position of the case guidance system. Since the mid-eighties of the last century, with the reform of the people's court's trial mode, the theoretical research on how to guide the trial practice by the case has been on the rise, but today it is necessary to understand the connotation and effectiveness of the instructive case. Have not yet formed a unified and clear ideas. It is the cornerstone and core of discussing all the problems of case guidance system to clarify the legal status of the case guidance system and to position the effectiveness of the guiding case. Our country has a long tradition of precedent system. Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the Supreme people's Court and the local people's courts at various levels have carried out many explorations and practices in using cases to guide the trial work, and accumulated a lot of valuable experience. To construct the case guidance system with Chinese characteristics, we should draw lessons from the case law of Anglo-American law system and the case system of continental law system, carry forward the tradition of our country's ancient case system, and absorb the valuable practical experience of our country's court case guidance. In particular, there are more than 20 years to issue the system of the Supreme people's Court Bulletin, the experience. It is true that the establishment of a case guidance system with Chinese characteristics involves many profound changes in concepts, institutions and even systems, and there are many obstacles to overcome, and many relevant theories to explore. There are many supporting systems that need to be improved. No rules to follow, no rules to learn from, is an unprecedented thing. In order to realize the value and vitality of the case guidance system, it is necessary to give the case guidance system the legal status of judicial interpretation and confirm the binding force of the guiding case in the judicial trial. In order to promote the uniform application of law, this system can run smoothly and give full play to its effectiveness. Such a positioning of the case guidance system conforms to China's national conditions, conforms to China's judicial reality, and does not exceed the authorization of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress. It is not only technically feasible but also has a legislative basis. At the same time, there are other civil law countries can learn from the practice. This paper makes a brief examination of the tradition of the ancient precedent system of our country, elaborates on the thought of the important figures in the traditional precedent system, and summarizes the practice of the people's court using cases to guide the trial work. This paper expounds the enlightenment of the case law of common law system and the case system of the civil law system to the case guidance system of our country, probes into the theoretical disputes in the field of legal circles about the construction of the case guidance system, and makes a preliminary design of the case guidance system with Chinese characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D920.4;D926.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙曉志;論快遞合同承運(yùn)人審核托寄物價(jià)值的義務(wù)[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2012年

2 李艷東;我國(guó)案例指導(dǎo)制度的法理分析[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1802227