本文選題：法律修辭 + 司法強(qiáng)拆　； 參考：《山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2012年06期

【摘要】：法律修辭學(xué)的核心在于其"聽眾理論"。"司法強(qiáng)拆"作為一種從司法到立法的全方位的法律修辭,其聽眾有以下三類:(1)普遍聽眾,即為社會(huì)大眾。(2)單一聽眾,即具體案件當(dāng)中的當(dāng)事人。(3)說(shuō)理者本身,即國(guó)家行政機(jī)關(guān)。而作為法律修辭的"司法強(qiáng)拆"的立法旨趣僅僅在于通過(guò)對(duì)三種聽眾進(jìn)行分化,爭(zhēng)取大多數(shù)的與具體案情沒(méi)有直接關(guān)系的社會(huì)大眾,在現(xiàn)有框架下盡量保證部分聽眾之間的局部矛盾不會(huì)輕而易舉的膨脹并發(fā)酵為其他矛盾。這種修辭存在概念的不穩(wěn)定性、價(jià)值初衷的功利性、實(shí)踐的顛覆性等三方面實(shí)務(wù)操作困境,但即便如此,"司法強(qiáng)拆"依然存在增量意義。
[Abstract]:The core of legal rhetoric lies in its audience theory. As a kind of omnidirectional legal rhetoric from judicature to legislation, the audience of judicial forced demolition is as follows: 1) the general audience, that is, the social mass, the single audience, that is, the litigant in the concrete case, the reasoning person himself, that is, the state administrative organ. The legislative purport of "judicial demolition" as legal rhetoric is only to divide the three kinds of listeners and win over the majority of the public who are not directly related to the specific circumstances of the case. Under the existing framework, try to ensure that local conflicts between some listeners do not expand easily and grow into other contradictions. There are three practical difficulties in this kind of rhetoric, such as the instability of concept, the utilitarianism of the original intention of value and the subversive nature of practice, but even so, there is still incremental significance in "judicial demolition".
【作者單位】： 重慶工商大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D90-55

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉玫;張建英;;我國(guó)大陸與臺(tái)灣地區(qū)搜查要件之分析研究——比較法視野的考量[J];比較法研究;2006年05期

2 傅賢國(guó);;農(nóng)村糾紛解決——對(duì)一起水庫(kù)案的實(shí)證考察[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

3 李長(zhǎng)健;王t，

本文編號(hào)：1789906