發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-20 23:03

  本文選題：次貸危機(jī) + 金融危機(jī)�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 發(fā)端于美國(guó)的次級(jí)抵押貸款危機(jī),經(jīng)過國(guó)際金融市場(chǎng)傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制的作用,迅速在全球范圍內(nèi)擴(kuò)散,最終讓世界各國(guó)陷入了自1929年之后最大的國(guó)際金融危機(jī)之中。面對(duì)危機(jī)中所暴露的制度缺陷,既是作為對(duì)金融危機(jī)之前舊有金融監(jiān)管法律制度的深刻檢討,也是對(duì)金融危機(jī)之后建立全新金融監(jiān)管法律制度改革的規(guī)劃,美國(guó)政府先后公布了《現(xiàn)代金融監(jiān)管體制改革藍(lán)圖》和《金融監(jiān)管改革——新基礎(chǔ)：重建金融監(jiān)管》。次級(jí)抵押貸款危機(jī)的另一“重災(zāi)區(qū)”——?dú)W盟,為彌補(bǔ)危機(jī)中所顯現(xiàn)的金融監(jiān)管漏洞和不足,則拋出了名為《歐盟金融監(jiān)管改革方案》的新世紀(jì)金融監(jiān)管改革計(jì)劃。與此同時(shí),巴塞爾銀行監(jiān)管委員會(huì)憑借其在國(guó)際金融領(lǐng)域的影響力,發(fā)布了多部應(yīng)對(duì)危機(jī)的法律性文件,借助這些規(guī)范性文件呼吁各國(guó)加強(qiáng)國(guó)際金融領(lǐng)域的監(jiān)管合作。次級(jí)抵押貸款危機(jī)的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展,再一次有力的證明了在國(guó)際金融一體化的大背景下,金融系統(tǒng)穩(wěn)健運(yùn)行的極端重要性。加強(qiáng)對(duì)金融的監(jiān)管,防范金融危機(jī)成為世界各國(guó)關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。隨著中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)對(duì)外開放程度不斷加大,現(xiàn)存的金融監(jiān)管模式面對(duì)金融市場(chǎng)、金融機(jī)構(gòu)互相融合,金融業(yè)務(wù)相互交叉的趨勢(shì),日益顯現(xiàn)出不能適應(yīng)市場(chǎng)發(fā)展,不能滿足金融安全需求的缺陷。如何在分析現(xiàn)存缺陷的基礎(chǔ)之上,結(jié)合自身實(shí)際情況,有效借鑒國(guó)外在該領(lǐng)域的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)也就具有了客觀的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求。在次級(jí)抵押貸款危機(jī)推動(dòng)之下,各種針對(duì)不斷發(fā)展變化的金融市場(chǎng)的法律監(jiān)管新思維新方案紛紛涌現(xiàn),把握這些變革的趨勢(shì)和目的,并參考美國(guó)和歐盟提升金融安全的改革方法和措施,無疑對(duì)我國(guó)未來的金融法律監(jiān)管改革有著巨大的助益。
[Abstract]:The subprime mortgage crisis, which originated in the United States, spread rapidly in the whole world through the function of the international financial market transmission mechanism, and finally made the countries of the world fall into the biggest international financial crisis since 1929. In the face of the institutional defects exposed in the crisis, it is not only a profound review of the old legal system of financial supervision before the financial crisis, but also a plan for the establishment of a new legal system of financial supervision after the financial crisis. The American government has published the Blueprint of the Reform of Modern Financial Supervision system and the New Foundation of Financial Supervision Reform: rebuilding Financial Supervision. The European Union, another major disaster area of the subprime mortgage crisis, has thrown out a new century financial regulatory reform plan called the European Union's financial regulatory reform plan in order to make up for the loopholes and deficiencies in financial regulation shown in the crisis. At the same time, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, with its influence in the international financial field, has issued a number of legal documents to deal with the crisis. With these normative documents, countries are called upon to strengthen regulatory cooperation in the field of international finance. The emergence and development of the subprime mortgage crisis once again proves the extreme importance of the steady operation of the financial system under the background of international financial integration. Strengthening financial supervision and preventing financial crisis has become the focus of attention all over the world. As China's economic opening to the outside world continues to increase, the existing financial supervision model is facing the financial market, the financial institutions are merging with each other, and the financial business is intersecting, which is increasingly showing a tendency that it cannot adapt to the development of the market. Failure to meet financial security needs. On the basis of analyzing the existing defects and combining with the actual situation, it is necessary to draw lessons from the successful experience of foreign countries in this field effectively. Driven by the subprime mortgage crisis, a variety of new ideas and schemes for legal regulation of the ever-changing financial markets have emerged to grasp the trends and purposes of these changes. With reference to the reform methods and measures of improving financial security in the United States and the European Union, there is no doubt that it will be of great help to the future reform of financial legal supervision in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD912.28

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張培堯;;資產(chǎn)證券化中SPV破產(chǎn)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)隔離法律機(jī)制探討[J];北京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 陳岱松;;試析美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管制度的變遷及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年03期

3 徐克恩;鄂志寰;;美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管體系的重大變革——《美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管體系現(xiàn)代化藍(lán)圖》評(píng)析[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2008年05期

4 葛奇;;次貸危機(jī)的成因、影響及對(duì)金融監(jiān)管的啟示[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2008年11期

5 李亞培;李楠;;美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管改革法案的新特征及其可能影響分析[J];甘肅金融;2009年08期

6 封文麗;;美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管改革新方案的剖析與啟示[J];海南金融;2009年10期

7 鄧翔;李雪嬌;;“次貸危機(jī)”下美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管體制改革分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年08期

8 李石凱;;是什么引起了美國(guó)次級(jí)抵押貸款危機(jī)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2007年11期

9 鄭聯(lián)盛;何德旭;;美國(guó)金融危機(jī)與金融監(jiān)管框架的反思[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2009年03期

10 高沛星;何芳;;美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管體制改革藍(lán)圖對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];金融經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1779818