本文選題：《大清刑事民事訴訟法》草案 + 刑事訴訟��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文以《大清刑事民事訴訟法》草案為主要研究對象,在清末法律變革的宏大歷史背景下,運用歷史學(xué)、法律文獻整理學(xué)、法律史學(xué)、訴訟法學(xué)、法律社會學(xué)等學(xué)科的基本知識、理論與方法從四個方面對其進行全面而詳細的考察和分析。概述如下: 第一部分在歷史學(xué)、社會學(xué)的視角下探究其產(chǎn)生的直接動因,利用晚清歷史資料勾勒出《大清刑事民事訴訟法》草案的制定過程。該草案是在清末改制的歷史背景下產(chǎn)生的,其產(chǎn)生的直接動因是收回西方列強在華領(lǐng)事裁判權(quán)�！洞笄逍淌旅袷略V訟法》草案的制定過程大致如此:沈家本、伍廷芳變通接受了御史劉彭年關(guān)于編纂訴訟法的主張,提出了制定《大清刑事民事訴訟法》的立法計劃,并建議派員赴日本考察訴訟制度,學(xué)習(xí)日本訴訟立法的成功經(jīng)驗,該草案由修訂法律館編纂完成后,沈、伍二人上《進呈訴訟法擬請先行試辦折》對草案進行了解釋和說明,并奏請光緒帝批準(zhǔn)先頒試行。 第二部分應(yīng)用訴訟法學(xué)的知識和理論對《大清刑事民事訴訟法》草案進行文本解讀,分析其體例、結(jié)構(gòu)、內(nèi)容及特點。該草案采用實體法與程序法分別編纂,刑事訴訟法與民事訴訟法合一的體例。本草案由總綱、刑事規(guī)則、民事規(guī)則、刑事民事通用規(guī)則、中外交涉案件五章及附于其后的頒行例構(gòu)成。通過對其結(jié)構(gòu)和內(nèi)容的分析可以歸納出該草案的特點如下:1.是一部過渡性立法;2.革除傳統(tǒng)司法審判中的弊病;3.引入西方近代訴訟制度,同時保留部分舊有制度;4.采用職權(quán)主義與當(dāng)事人主義相結(jié)合的混合訴訟模式。 第三部分主要闡述圍繞《大清刑事民事訴訟法》草案所產(chǎn)生的論爭。該草案提交清廷后,以張之洞為首的地方大員提出了各種異議。雙方爭論焦點是刑訊、逮捕、刑事裁判、查封產(chǎn)物、律師、陪審等制度。這次論爭是清末禮法之爭的前奏,其實質(zhì)是中西訴訟法價值的沖突,同時也是法律變革的路徑之爭。 第四部分則探究《大清刑事民事訴訟法》草案的命運及其原因。通過對史料的剖析,可以認定該草案的最終命運是“胎亡”。該草案胎亡的直接原因是地方大員們的反對和情勢的變更,間接原因同時也是更深層次的原因則是政治制度變革的滯后和意識形態(tài)的束縛。
[Abstract]:This paper, taking the draft of the criminal civil procedure law of the Great Qing Dynasty as the main object of study, has carried out a comprehensive and detailed investigation and analysis of the basic knowledge, theory and method of history, legal literature collation, legal history, procedural law and legal sociology under the grand historical background of the reform of the late Qing Dynasty in four aspects. As follows:
The first part explores the direct cause of its production in the perspective of history and sociology, and uses the historical data of the late Qing Dynasty to outline the process of making the draft of the criminal civil procedure law of the Qing Dynasty. The draft is produced in the historical background of the reform of the late Qing Dynasty. The direct motive of the draft is to reclaim the consular jurisdiction of the Western powers in China. The drafting process of the draft of procedural law is roughly the same: Shen Jiaben, Wu Tingfang, who accepted the claim of the imperial history Liu Pengnian on the codification of litigation law, put forward the legislative plan for the formulation of the criminal civil procedure law of the Qing Dynasty, and suggested that the staff be sent to Japan to inspect the litigation system and to learn the successful experience of the Japanese lawsuit legislation. The draft was revised by the law Museum. After the completion of the compilation, Shen and Wu put forward the explanation and explanation of the draft.
The second part applies the knowledge and theory of procedural law to interpret the text of the draft of the criminal civil procedure law of the Qing Dynasty, and analyzes its style, structure, content and characteristics. The draft adopts the separate compilation of substantive law and procedural law and the combination of criminal procedure law and civil procedure law. This draft is composed of general programme, criminal rule, civil rule, criminal civil law. The general rule, five chapters of the case of negotiation between China and foreign countries and the enactment of the enactment. Through the analysis of its structure and content, it can be concluded that the characteristics of the draft are as follows: 1. is a transitional legislation; 2. to remove the maladies in the traditional judicial trial; 3. introduce modern western litigation system, and retain some old system; 4. use power doctrine. A combination of litigant and litigants.
The third part mainly expounds the controversy surrounding the draft of the criminal civil procedure law of the Great Qing Dynasty. After the draft was submitted to the Qing court, a variety of objections were put forward by the local large members headed by Zhang Zhidong. The dispute between the two sides is the system of torture, arrest, criminal judgment, seal up products, lawyers, jury and other systems. This controversy is the prelude to the dispute of the law of rites in the late Qing Dynasty, in fact Quality is the conflict between the value of Chinese and Western procedural law, as well as the contention of the path of legal change.
The fourth part explores the fate and causes of the draft of the criminal civil procedure law of the Great Qing Dynasty. Through the analysis of the historical data, it can be found that the final fate of the draft is "the death of the fetus". The direct reason for the death of the draft is the change of the opposition and the situation of the local large members, the indirect cause and the deeper reason is the political system change. The lag of leather and the shackles of ideology.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D929;D925.1;D925.2
，

本文編號：1779095