本文選題：判例法 + 卡爾·盧埃林　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 法律現(xiàn)實(shí)主義是影響美國(guó)法律發(fā)展、法學(xué)教育、法律實(shí)踐的一場(chǎng)重要運(yùn)動(dòng),盧埃林作為美國(guó)法律現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的領(lǐng)軍人物,通過(guò)對(duì)判例的實(shí)證研究闡發(fā)現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法學(xué)思想,以現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法學(xué)思想來(lái)改造判例法的相關(guān)理論。雖然對(duì)盧埃林某些法學(xué)觀點(diǎn),學(xué)界的意見并不一致,褒貶都不在少數(shù),但是盧埃林的判例法思想?yún)s得到廣泛的認(rèn)同。盧埃林一些關(guān)于判例的論述成為大家引用的經(jīng)典。 盧埃林認(rèn)為,判例法與成文法都是美國(guó)權(quán)威法律淵源,判例法存在于判例中,是法官在解決具體糾紛的過(guò)程中創(chuàng)造的法;要把握判例中的規(guī)則,不僅要研究判決意見,更要研究相關(guān)的材料,以懷疑的態(tài)度來(lái)考察判例,以規(guī)范的目的能否實(shí)現(xiàn)為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)考察規(guī)則;遵循先例的原則是雙面的,嚴(yán)格觀點(diǎn)與寬松觀點(diǎn)并存,其中嚴(yán)格觀點(diǎn)用來(lái)限制不受歡迎的判例或判例中某部分的適用,寬松觀點(diǎn)則用來(lái)擴(kuò)大受歡迎的判例或判例中某部分的適用;先例適用中確實(shí)存在著一些為人們所忽視的適用技術(shù),根據(jù)盧埃林的不完全列舉已達(dá)64項(xiàng)之多;遵循先例的原則指導(dǎo)法官援用先例裁判案件,法官運(yùn)用先例適用技術(shù)創(chuàng)造性地適用先例。 盧埃林作為《美國(guó)統(tǒng)一商法典》起草組的組長(zhǎng),他的判例法思想與法典似乎存在矛盾,實(shí)際上并非如此。法典和判例法都是在法律現(xiàn)實(shí)主義思想指導(dǎo)下形成的,法典梳理判例成為體系,判例法補(bǔ)充法典的適用,二者統(tǒng)一于法律的現(xiàn)代化以及理想法律規(guī)則的目標(biāo)。 研究盧埃林判例法思想目的在于更好地理解中國(guó)的制度,包括古代的各種例形成的中國(guó)特色的判例制度,以及新中國(guó)的案例指導(dǎo)制度;而只有切實(shí)把握了什么是判例法,更為深刻地理解了中國(guó)的制度,才能更好地反思中國(guó)的實(shí)際。
[Abstract]:Legal realism is an important movement that affects the development of American law, legal education and legal practice. Llewellyn, as the leading figure of American legal realism, elucidates the realistic legal thought through the empirical study of the case law. To reform the relevant theories of case law with realistic legal thought. Although the opinions of Llewellyn are not unanimous, but Llewellyn's case law thought is widely accepted. Some of Llewellyn's arguments on the case law have been cited as classics. Llewellyn believed that both case law and statute law are the authoritative sources of law in the United States. Case law exists in cases and is the law created by judges in the process of resolving specific disputes. In order to grasp the rules of case law, it is necessary not only to study judgment opinions, It is even more important to study relevant materials, to examine the case law with a skeptical attitude, and to examine the rules according to whether the purpose of the norm can be realized. The principle of following precedents is double-sided, and strict views coexist with lenient views. The strict view is used to limit the application of an unpopular case or a part of a case, while the loose view is used to expand the application of a popular case or part of a case; There are indeed some techniques that people ignore in the application of precedents, as many as 64 according to Llewellyn's incomplete enumeration; the principle of precedent guides judges to use precedents to adjudicate cases. Judges apply precedents creatively and creatively. As the leader of the drafting group of the uniform Commercial Code of the United States, Llewellyn's thought of case law seems to contradict the Code, but in fact it is not. Both the code and the case law are formed under the guidance of the legal realism thought, the code combs the case law to become the system, the case law supplements the code the application, both unify in the legal modernization and the ideal legal rule goal. The purpose of studying Llewellyn's case law thought is to better understand the Chinese system, including the case system with Chinese characteristics formed by various ancient examples, and the case guidance system of New China. A deeper understanding of China's system can better reflect on China's reality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D909.712

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周國(guó)興;尋求現(xiàn)實(shí)的確定性[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1778993