本文選題：制度　切入點：巡回審判　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 巡回審判在世界上有著悠久的歷史。我國的巡回審判與西方相比,在法學(xué)理論和司法實踐中都存在著顯著的差異。我國的巡回審判始于1925年的廣州國民政府時期,普遍適用于革命根據(jù)地政權(quán)。與英美的巡回審判制度所不同的是,其在我國并非王權(quán)擴張的產(chǎn)物,而是特殊時情下的必要選擇。自1925年在我國試行以來,巡回審判歷經(jīng)了多次司法改革。最高人民法院于2005年重提推行巡回審判之后,巡回審判進入了一個全面恢復(fù)和發(fā)展階段。 本文以時間為線索,較為系統(tǒng)地介紹了我國巡回審判的發(fā)展歷程,對其功能及合理性進行分析,并就巡回審判的一些關(guān)鍵問題提出了自己的構(gòu)想,以期能對該項審判制度的完善盡到綿薄之力。全文除導(dǎo)言和結(jié)語外,分為三個部分: 第一部分闡述了巡回審判的形成。首先介紹了巡回審判在世界上的起源即在英國的形成及在美國的發(fā)展狀況。其次論述了在我國的形成,主要包括廣東國民政府和革命根據(jù)地兩個部分,并對其成因進行了簡單分析。在革命根據(jù)地部分還較為詳細介紹了對當時和今后司法工作均有較大影響的“馬錫五審判方式”。 第二部分介紹了巡回審判在中華人民共和國建國后的發(fā)展情況,主要分為三個階段:恢復(fù)期(1949.10～1958.3)、動蕩期(1958.3～1979.7)和復(fù)興期(1979.7～)。并結(jié)合筆者對上海市楊浦區(qū)人民法院的調(diào)研情況,從設(shè)立動因、主要做法和工作成效三方面介紹了該法院“社區(qū)巡回法庭”的實踐情況。 第三部分主要分析巡回審判的功能及合理性,并對巡回審判提出了一些構(gòu)想意見,如巡回審判的定性問題、適用等級、巡回法庭的定位問題。筆者將巡回審判的功能歸納為:便利民眾訴訟,有效減輕訴累;指導(dǎo)人民調(diào)解,促進矛盾化解;擴大法制宣傳,維護社會穩(wěn)定;節(jié)約司法成本,優(yōu)化資源配置。從理論基礎(chǔ)、地理因素、人文因素、政治因素四個方面作了合理性分析。 中國的司法改革任重道遠,我們必須針對現(xiàn)存的具體問題和客觀需求來進行司法改革,而不是按照某種法治或司法制度的理念來改造我國的司法制度和法官體制。唯有如此,我們的司法改革才是科學(xué)的、可行的和成功的。
[Abstract]:The circuit trial has a long history in the world.Compared with the western countries, there are significant differences in the theory of law and judicial practice in our country.The itinerant trial in our country began in 1925 in the period of Guangzhou National Government and was generally applicable to the regime in the revolutionary base area.Different from the touring trial system in Britain and America, it is not the product of Wang Quan's expansion in China, but a necessary choice under special circumstances.Since the trial in our country in 1925, the circuit trial has gone through many judicial reforms.After the Supreme people's Court reintroduced the circuit trial in 2005, the circuit trial entered a comprehensive recovery and development stage.Based on the clue of time, this paper systematically introduces the development course of our country's circuit trial, analyzes its function and rationality, and puts forward its own conception on some key problems of the circuit trial.With a view to the perfection of the trial system to a modest force.In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into three parts:The first part expounds the formation of the circuit trial.First of all, it introduces the origin of circuit trial in the world, that is, the formation in Britain and the development in the United States.Secondly, it discusses the formation in our country, including Guangdong National Government and revolutionary base area, and analyzes its cause of formation.In the part of the revolutionary base area, Ma Xiwu trial method, which had great influence on the judicial work at that time and in the future, was also introduced in detail.The second part introduces the development of the circuit trial after the founding of the people's Republic of China, which is divided into three stages: recovery period (1949.10 / 1958.3), turbulent period (1958.3 / 1979.7) and revival period (1979.7).Combined with the author's investigation of the Yangpu District people's Court in Shanghai, the author introduces the practice of the Court's "Community Circuit Court" from three aspects: the motive, the main method and the work effect.The third part mainly analyzes the function and rationality of the circuit trial, and puts forward some ideas to the circuit trial, such as the qualitative problem of the circuit trial, the applicable grade, and the positioning of the circuit court.The author summarizes the functions of the circuit trial as: to facilitate public litigation, effectively reduce the burden of litigation; guide the people to mediate, promote the resolution of contradictions; expand legal publicity, maintain social stability; save judicial costs, optimize the allocation of resources.The rationality analysis is made from four aspects: theoretical basis, geographical factor, humanistic factor and political factor.China's judicial reform has a long way to go. We must carry out judicial reform in accordance with the existing concrete problems and objective needs, rather than reform our judicial system and judge system according to some concept of the rule of law or judicial system.Only in this way, our judicial reform is scientific, feasible and successful.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D929;D926.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張志遠;當前中國巡回審判制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

2 李婧;論我國民事巡回審判制度的完善[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1725577