本文選題：《欽定臺規(guī)》　切入點：清代監(jiān)察法　出處：《湘潭大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 《欽定臺規(guī)》是清代最為系統(tǒng)完整的一部監(jiān)察法規(guī),在中國古代監(jiān)察法制史上具有重要意義。關于清代監(jiān)察制度的研究,學界已取得不少成果,但尚未有人從法律文本的角度對《臺規(guī)》進行專門論述。因此,研究這部法律,挖掘其中蘊含的內(nèi)容和思想,并對它作出客觀評價,是頗具學術價值的。 本文之初,即從介紹乾隆、嘉慶、道光、光緒四朝《臺規(guī)》的版本和流傳情況入手,然后展開論述。文章詳細論述了法典對清代監(jiān)察機構(gòu)的設置、監(jiān)察內(nèi)容以及監(jiān)察職官管理制度的規(guī)定;深入剖析了法典所體現(xiàn)的皇權(quán)至上、恩威并施、重視司法監(jiān)察、廣開言路等監(jiān)察法律思想;結(jié)合清代監(jiān)察官員的執(zhí)法狀況及其權(quán)力被削弱的狀況,探討了法律的實際運行狀態(tài)和實施效果。最后,文章分析了《欽定臺規(guī)》在整個古代監(jiān)察法律體系中的重要地位,并試圖對法典的利弊作出客觀評價。 在論證中,本文并不一味輕信《臺規(guī)》的規(guī)定,而是將其與其他典籍記載與實際運行相驗證,探究法規(guī)內(nèi)容的真實性與合理性,分析法律規(guī)定與實際操作之間的相合與歧異,進而提出自己的觀點。 文章在吸收清代政治史、法制史等學科研究成果的基礎上,比較系統(tǒng)全面地考察了《臺規(guī)》的主要內(nèi)容和立法特點,肯定了這部監(jiān)察法的積極意義,就都察院長官名稱更改時間、稽察宗室御史處是否一度停置、清代言官的實際權(quán)力是擴大還是縮小等具體問題,提出了自己的一點淺見。
[Abstract]:As the most systematic and complete supervisory law in the Qing Dynasty, the Imperial Rule of Taiwan is of great significance in the history of the legal system of supervision in ancient China.There have been many achievements in the research of the supervision system in Qing Dynasty, but no one has made a special exposition on Taiji from the angle of legal text.Therefore, it is of academic value to study this law, dig out its contents and ideas, and make an objective evaluation of it.At the beginning of this paper, it begins with the introduction of the versions and the circulation of Qianlong, Jiaqing, Daoguang and Guang Xu in the four dynasties.The article discusses in detail the establishment, supervision content and the regulation of supervisory official management system in the Qing Dynasty, and deeply analyzes the imperial power supremacy embodied in the Code, the combination of grace and power, and the emphasis on judicial supervision.Combined with the law enforcement situation and the weakening of the power of the supervisory officials in the Qing Dynasty, this paper probes into the actual operation and effect of the law.Finally, the article analyzes the important position of "Qinding Tai Regulation" in the whole ancient supervisory legal system, and tries to make an objective evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of the code.In the argumentation, this paper does not blindly believe in the provisions of the "Taiwan regulations", but verifies them with the records of other classics and their actual operation, probes into the authenticity and rationality of the contents of the laws and regulations, and analyzes the consistency and differences between the laws and regulations and the actual operation.And then put forward his own point of view.On the basis of absorbing the research achievements of the Qing Dynasty's political history and the history of legal system, the article systematically and comprehensively examines the main contents and legislative characteristics of the Taiwan regulations, and affirms the positive significance of this supervisory law.On the specific problems of changing the name of the chief of the capital court, checking whether the imperial history office of the imperial family was stopped for a time, and whether the actual power of the speech officer in the Qing Dynasty was enlarged or reduced, the author put forward his own simple views.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D929

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李光輝;清代監(jiān)察官員的選任、升轉(zhuǎn)與考核[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);2002年01期

2 方寶璋;清代監(jiān)察官的兼職審計[J];當代審計;1994年03期

3 陳彬,阜元;論清代監(jiān)察制度的兩個問題[J];四川師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1997年03期

4 楊軍;周湘榮;;論清代監(jiān)察體制的三重性[J];湖南工程學院學報(社會科學版);2005年04期

5 關漢華;清代監(jiān)察官員考選制度述論[J];廣東社會科學;2002年06期

6 劉鳳云;從康雍乾三帝對督撫的簡用談清代的專制皇權(quán)[J];河南大學學報(社會科學版);2004年03期

7 關文發(fā);試評嘉慶的“廣開言路”與“洪亮吉上書事件”[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);1996年01期

8 修曉波;;清代監(jiān)察制度的最后強化與衰敗(上)[J];中國監(jiān)察;2006年22期

9 修曉波;;清代監(jiān)察制度的最后強化與衰敗(中)[J];中國監(jiān)察;2006年23期

10 修曉波;;清代監(jiān)察制度的最后強化與衰敗(下)[J];中國監(jiān)察;2006年24期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 焦利;清代監(jiān)察法研究[D];中國政法大學;2006年

2 汪慶紅;監(jiān)察與制衡[D];中國政法大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1716095