本文選題：唐律　切入點(diǎn)：貪污賄賂罪　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 貪污賄賂犯罪的懲治和預(yù)防為歷代立法者重視。中國(guó)自唐代進(jìn)入法制成熟完備發(fā)達(dá)期,對(duì)貪污賄賂罪的懲治的立法集歷代法典之大成,技術(shù)純熟,內(nèi)容完備,極具代表性。這些內(nèi)容集中反映在完整保留至今的《唐律疏議》里面�！短坡伞穼�(duì)貪污賄賂罪作了類型化的處理,同時(shí)規(guī)定了一整套與之相適應(yīng)的原則和規(guī)則,體現(xiàn)在總則和分則里面。這使該罪的定罪量刑便于操作,為后代所承襲。實(shí)行社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的當(dāng)今中國(guó),由于體制和機(jī)制方面的原因,貪污賄賂犯罪處于高發(fā)態(tài)勢(shì)。明古鑒今,如能對(duì)代表中國(guó)漫長(zhǎng)封建社會(huì)最高立法成就的唐律進(jìn)行全方位研究,定能給當(dāng)前的懲治和預(yù)防腐敗體系建設(shè)提供理論和實(shí)踐支撐。 從唐律對(duì)貪污賄賂的懲治來看,既有總則性規(guī)定,又有分則性規(guī)定；分則里面,犯罪主體、犯罪客體、主觀方面、客觀方面均有所兼顧；犯罪客觀方面涉及危害行為、危害結(jié)果、犯罪時(shí)間、犯罪地點(diǎn),定罪量刑均考慮到上述因素,分別情況,定量有殊�？梢哉f唐律織就了一張懲治貪污賄賂罪的密而不漏的法網(wǎng)。同時(shí),唐律注重懲治,又重視預(yù)防,建立諸如監(jiān)察制度,科學(xué)制度,經(jīng)濟(jì)審計(jì)監(jiān)督制度等配套制度,形成一個(gè)懲治與預(yù)防的有機(jī)系統(tǒng),借鑒與啟示部分分析了唐律的歷史和階級(jí)局限性,同時(shí)也顯示了懲治貪污賄賂罪是一歷史性課題和艱巨而復(fù)雜的任務(wù)。
[Abstract]:The punishment and prevention of corruption and bribery are paid more attention by the legislators of the past generations . China has entered the mature and mature period of the rule of law since the Tang Dynasty , and the legislation set for the punishment of corruption and bribery has been treated in a typed way . It also provides a complete set of principles and rules applicable to the crime of corruption and bribery . It also lays down a set of principles and rules applicable to the crime of corruption and bribery .



From the point of view of the punishment of corruption and bribery in the Tang dynasty , there are both general rules and sub - rule provisions ;
In the sub - rule , the subjective and objective aspects of the subject , object , subjective and objective aspects of the crime are balanced ;
The objective aspects of crime involve harm behavior , harm result , time of crime , place of crime , conviction measure and punishment , which take into account the above factors , the situation and the quantitative disparity . At the same time , Tang law pays attention to punishment , and attaches great importance to prevention , establishes a system of organic system , such as supervision system , scientific system , economic audit and supervision system , and forms a system of punishment and prevention . It also shows the history and class limitation of Tang law . It also shows that punishing corruption and bribery is a historic task and arduous and complicated task .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 高積順;;古今懲貪與治盜的寬嚴(yán)比較[J];河北法學(xué);2008年07期

2 霍存福，，丁相順;《唐律疏議》“以”“準(zhǔn)”字例析[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1994年05期

本文編號(hào)：1668622