本文選題：禮貌　切入點：禮貌原則　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 法庭話語是一種以目的為導(dǎo)向、圍繞特定任務(wù)展開的典型的機(jī)構(gòu)性話語。與此同時,禮貌是人類文明和進(jìn)步的標(biāo)志,是人類活動的一條準(zhǔn)繩。作為一種社會活動,語言活動同樣受到這一原則的約束。 本文采用現(xiàn)有的理論框架,描述性和實證性相結(jié)合,從語言禮貌的角度對中國法庭話語進(jìn)行了初步的研究。同時,本文也試圖證明顧曰國提出的禮貌原則同樣適用于法庭話語這一特殊的機(jī)構(gòu)話語。 本文以兩場中國民事審判和刑事審判錄音轉(zhuǎn)寫為語料,對此進(jìn)行了定性分析。第一部分簡要介紹了本選題的研究背景、研究目的、研究方法和涉及的語料。第二部分是文獻(xiàn)綜述,簡要介紹了國內(nèi)外對法庭話語及禮貌進(jìn)行研究的一些成果。筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)國內(nèi)學(xué)者甚少研究中國法庭話語中的禮貌現(xiàn)象,特別是用顧曰國提出的中國式的禮貌原則分析中國法庭話語的研究根本沒有。第三部分理論綜述,首先介紹了利奇的禮貌原則,而后引出對我國學(xué)者顧曰國提出的禮貌原則的介紹,并介紹了布朗和列文森的面子保全理論及廖美珍的目的原則,最后提出了適用于本文研究的理論框架:以顧曰國的禮貌原則、面子保全理論為指導(dǎo),分析法庭話語中的禮貌現(xiàn)象,然后采用目的原則對其進(jìn)行解釋。第四部分,筆者對本文所選取的四個語料進(jìn)行了分析,肯定了中國法庭話語中存在中國式的禮貌現(xiàn)象和不禮貌現(xiàn)象,并在語料中辨別出三種禮貌策略:積極禮貌策略、消極禮貌策略和非公開的禮貌策略。而后,采用廖美珍的目的原則來解釋庭審話語中的禮貌現(xiàn)象及采用不同禮貌策略的原因:參與者各自不同的目的及權(quán)利關(guān)系。第五部分為結(jié)論部分,通過對中國庭審語料的描述性和實證性相結(jié)合的分析,本文認(rèn)為,顧曰國雖是在中國傳統(tǒng)文化背景下提出的有中國特色的禮貌原則,但對中國庭審話語這樣一種機(jī)構(gòu)話語同樣適用,含有豐富的語用意義:同時布朗和列文森的面子保全理論及廖美珍的目的原則在解釋機(jī)構(gòu)話語語言運(yùn)用的禮貌現(xiàn)象中同樣具有解釋力。最后筆者對整篇論文作了小結(jié),還指出了本文的局限性。 本文首次采用顧曰國的禮貌原則分析中國的法庭話語,以期能提高中國庭審參與者的口頭表達(dá)能力和應(yīng)變能力。本文只是首次的嘗試,不足之處還很多,這個題目有待做的更深更大。
[Abstract]:Court discourse is a kind of typical institutional discourse which is oriented by purpose and revolves around a particular task. At the same time, politeness is a symbol of human civilization and progress and a yardstick of human activities. Language activities are also constrained by this principle. This paper, using the existing theoretical framework and combining descriptive and positivism, makes a preliminary study of Chinese court discourse from the perspective of linguistic politeness. This paper also tries to prove that the politeness principle proposed by Gu Yueguo is also applicable to the special institutional discourse of court discourse. In this paper, two Chinese civil trials and criminal trials are recorded and analyzed qualitatively. The first part briefly introduces the research background and purpose of this topic. The second part is a literature review, which briefly introduces some achievements in the study of court discourse and politeness at home and abroad. The author finds that domestic scholars seldom study politeness phenomena in Chinese court discourse. In particular, there is no research on the analysis of Chinese court discourse with the Chinese politeness principle put forward by Gu Yueguo. In the third part, the author introduces Leech's politeness principle. Then it introduces the politeness principle put forward by Gu Yueguo, a Chinese scholar, and introduces Brown and Levinson's theory of saving face and Liao Meizhen's principle of purpose. Finally, the theoretical framework applicable to this study is put forward: under the guidance of Gu Yueguo's politeness principle and face-saving theory, the politeness phenomenon in court discourse is analyzed, and then explained by the Skopos principle. The author analyzes the four corpus selected in this paper, confirms the existence of Chinese politeness and impoliteness in Chinese court discourse, and identifies three politeness strategies in the corpus: positive politeness strategy. Negative politeness strategies and non-public politeness strategies. Then, Using Liao Meizhen's Skopos principle to explain the politeness phenomenon in court discourse and the reasons for adopting different politeness strategies: the participants have different aims and rights. The fifth part is the conclusion. Based on the analysis of the descriptive and empirical features of the Chinese trial corpus, this paper holds that although Gu Yueguo is a politeness principle with Chinese characteristics put forward under the background of Chinese traditional culture, But it also applies to a kind of institutional discourse such as China's trial discourse. At the same time, Brown and Levinson's face saving theory and Liao Meizhen's Skopos principle have the same explanatory power in explaining the politeness phenomenon in the use of institutional discourse language. Finally, the author makes a brief summary of the whole thesis. The limitations of this paper are also pointed out. This paper first uses Gu Yue Guo's politeness principle to analyze Chinese court discourse in order to improve the oral expression and adaptability of Chinese court participants. The subject needs to be done deeper and bigger.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D90-055;H13

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 夏丹;中國民事審判話語敘事研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1667779