本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可　切入點(diǎn)：歐共體競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域，對(duì)拒絕許可行為進(jìn)行反壟斷規(guī)制，是一個(gè)極具挑戰(zhàn)性的重任，我們勢(shì)必會(huì)面臨一系列復(fù)雜的問題。歐盟反壟斷規(guī)制作為立法范式，在世界各國(guó)反壟斷法的發(fā)展中扮演了十分重要的角色。我國(guó)反壟斷法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的規(guī)定太過原則，因此，研究歐盟知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的反壟斷規(guī)制顯得尤為重要。 本文從借鑒國(guó)外的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)出發(fā)，以案例為視角，研究歐盟對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可行為的規(guī)制。再以實(shí)證分析的方法，著重研究歐盟在司法實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用共同體統(tǒng)一的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)規(guī)則對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人利用市場(chǎng)支配地位進(jìn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可的行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。本文通過對(duì)歐盟的立法和司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行歷史分析，對(duì)其立法的發(fā)展情況有更理性的認(rèn)識(shí)。在對(duì)歐盟相關(guān)司法案例進(jìn)行反復(fù)搜尋與比較中，力求對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可的反壟斷規(guī)制有一個(gè)更全面細(xì)致的感性認(rèn)識(shí)。從歷史進(jìn)程的角度，在一定意義上超脫于特定時(shí)期的法律規(guī)范本身來觀察和分析處于不斷發(fā)展中的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法，以求掌握歐盟關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)拒絕許可的反壟斷規(guī)制的全貌。 歐盟在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域?qū)芙^許可行為進(jìn)行反壟斷規(guī)制的過程中，所積累的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)與司法實(shí)踐，對(duì)我國(guó)規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域拒絕許可行為等問題具有重要借鑒意義。通過對(duì)歐盟相關(guān)司法案例的搜索和分析，對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域拒絕許可的反壟斷規(guī)制的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況有更深入的認(rèn)識(shí)。更重要的，，通過對(duì)相關(guān)立法情況的回顧，理性地剖析其深層次的原因，可以為解決目前我國(guó)的反壟斷規(guī)制的適用依據(jù)提供思路。筆者通過對(duì)歐盟的實(shí)踐進(jìn)行辯證分析，得出其存在無法適用新形勢(shì)的缺陷，進(jìn)而針對(duì)性地對(duì)我國(guó)提出完善《反壟斷法》、制定私人訴訟制度、出臺(tái)相關(guān)指南等完善意見。
[Abstract]:In the field of intellectual property rights, it is a challenging task to regulate the refusal of license, and we are bound to face a series of complicated problems. It plays a very important role in the development of anti-monopoly law in the world. Our country's anti-monopoly law has too much principle on the field of intellectual property, so it is very important to study the anti-monopoly regulation in the field of intellectual property of EU. Based on the experience of foreign countries, this paper studies the regulation of the refusal of intellectual property rights in the EU from the perspective of a case study. This paper focuses on the use of common competition rules in the judicial practice of the European Union to regulate the refusal of intellectual property rights by intellectual property owners to take advantage of the dominant position of the market. This paper makes a study of the legislation and judicial practice of the European Union. Carrying out historical analysis, To have a more rational understanding of the development of its legislation. In the repeated search and comparison of relevant EU judicial cases, Strive to have a more comprehensive and meticulous understanding of the anti-monopoly regulation of the refusal of license of intellectual property. From the perspective of historical process, In a certain sense, it is beyond the legal norms of a specific period to observe and analyze the competition law, which is constantly developing, in order to obtain a complete picture of the anti-monopoly regulations of the European Union on the refusal of intellectual property rights (IPR). The EU has accumulated legislative experience and judicial practice in the process of regulating the refusal of permission in the field of intellectual property rights. It is of great significance for our country to regulate the refusal of license in the field of intellectual property. Through the search and analysis of relevant judicial cases in the European Union, We have a deeper understanding of the current situation of anti-monopoly regulation in the field of intellectual property rights, and more importantly, through reviewing the relevant legislation, we can rationally analyze its deep-seated reasons. Through the dialectical analysis of the practice of the European Union, the author draws the conclusion that the EU has defects which cannot be applied to the new situation. Then, the author puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the Anti-monopoly Law, formulating the private litigation system and issuing relevant guidelines.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D95;D922.294;D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王健;2002年《企業(yè)法》與英國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的新發(fā)展[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2005年02期

2 許光耀;;著作權(quán)拒絕許可行為的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法分析——?dú)W洲法院IMS案判決研究[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2007年06期

本文編號(hào)：1580810