發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-01 16:14

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范 制憲權(quán) 實(shí)踐 反思性認(rèn)同 政治價(jià)值　出處：《清華法學(xué)》2012年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：凱爾森基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范的認(rèn)識(shí)論背后潛藏著重要的政治功能:通過法治保存民主自由國家的多元社會(huì)價(jià)值。然而,以一種自由主義的中立性原則來處理價(jià)值問題并不適合法律秩序。原因即在于法的規(guī)范性陳述只有認(rèn)識(shí)—語義學(xué)意義,但作為陳述對(duì)象的"法規(guī)范",則必然具有實(shí)踐—語用學(xué)功能,而在一個(gè)多元社會(huì),法規(guī)范實(shí)踐功能之有效發(fā)揮必然要涉及"理由追問",這種理由在證成一個(gè)具體規(guī)范的時(shí)候就已經(jīng)涉及政治價(jià)值的權(quán)衡和運(yùn)用。凱爾森基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范在認(rèn)識(shí)論上是成立的,但當(dāng)它是法律體系的基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范時(shí),就無法回避法律體系的本質(zhì)在于實(shí)踐這一根本特征。
[Abstract]:There is an important political function behind Kelsen's basic normative epistemology: preserving the pluralistic social values of a democratic and free country through the rule of law. It is not suitable for the legal order to deal with the value problem with a kind of liberalism neutral principle. The reason is that the normative statement of law has only cognitive-semantic meaning. However, the "legal norms", which are the objects of statement, must have the function of practice-pragmatics, and in a pluralistic society, The effective exertion of the practical function of law and norm must involve "reason questioning", which has already involved the weighing and applying of political value when it is proved to be a concrete norm. The Kelsen basic norm is established in epistemology. However, when it is the basic norm of legal system, the essence of legal system lies in practice.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2010年度中國人民大學(xué)“中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)基金項(xiàng)目”(10XNF044)成果
【分類號(hào)】：D909.1

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高全喜;;憲法與革命及中國憲制問題[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2010年02期

2 劉練軍;;基本法的功能性與開放性及其啟示——《聯(lián)邦德國憲法綱要》讀后[J];北方法學(xué);2010年02期

3 湛中樂;謝珂s，

本文編號(hào)：1552641