試論《管子》的立法思想及其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-01 04:26
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 先秦時(shí)期 《管子》 立法思想 現(xiàn)實(shí)意義 出處:《江蘇大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】: 管仲是先秦時(shí)期著名的政治家、思想家,而《管子》一書,學(xué)界普遍認(rèn)為是古代的稷下學(xué)者們托管仲之名所著。就其內(nèi)容而言,《管子》就是一本大百科全書,它的思想豐富而深刻,涵蓋了法律、政治、軍事、經(jīng)濟(jì)、科技等多個(gè)方面。在《管子》的諸多思想中,又尤以其法律思想最為突出。書中大量的關(guān)于法律制度的記載,是研究先秦法制史不可多得的資料!豆茏印逢P(guān)于法的起源,法的性質(zhì)和作用,法律的制定和執(zhí)行等方面的論述,精辟而深刻;一些有名的論斷,如“以法治國”,至今仍為我們所提倡和沿用。只有對(duì)其法律思想進(jìn)行考察,我們才能夠?qū)Α豆茏印返乃枷塍w系有一個(gè)總體的把握。 在《管子》系統(tǒng)而豐富的法律思想中,其立法思想占有重要的地位!豆茏印份^為全面地闡述了立法應(yīng)遵從天道、順應(yīng)民心;立法要因時(shí)、因俗而變;立法應(yīng)寬嚴(yán)適度,公開透明等一系列關(guān)于立法的基本原則問題。毫無疑問,這些呈現(xiàn)出了超越時(shí)代的理性光芒,至今仍然極具借鑒意義。 多年來,學(xué)者們已分別從多個(gè)方面對(duì)《管子》的法律思想進(jìn)行了探索和闡述。他們或者研究其法律思想的特點(diǎn),或者辨析其法律的概念,或者分析其與秦晉法家的區(qū)別,或者考察其立法、執(zhí)法特點(diǎn),或者考察法律與其它社會(huì)關(guān)系或文化的關(guān)系,但深入考究其立法思想的文章卻不多見。這對(duì)人們準(zhǔn)確地理解先秦時(shí)期的法律思想造成了一定的影響。正是出于這一考慮,本文廣泛搜集資料,參考、借鑒相關(guān)的研究成果,運(yùn)用歷史的、辯證的分析研究方法,梳理了《管子》的立法思想的內(nèi)容及特點(diǎn),以期能夠全面、系統(tǒng)地展現(xiàn)《管子》立法思想的全貌。 《管子》立法思想的研究對(duì)當(dāng)代中國法制建設(shè)具有重大意義,其中體現(xiàn)出來的天人合一、德法并舉、家國和諧的思想不僅可以而且完全應(yīng)當(dāng)被吸收借鑒,用來為今天的法治建設(shè)服務(wù),為當(dāng)前建設(shè)社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)服務(wù)。我們只有立足于中國傳統(tǒng)文化,汲取其精髓,結(jié)合當(dāng)代中國的國情,才能建立起適合當(dāng)代中國的法制體系,才能實(shí)現(xiàn)真正的法治社會(huì)。
[Abstract]:Guan Zhong is a famous politician, thinker in pre Qin period, and "pipe" a book, scholars generally believe that is the ancient Jixia scholars managed according to the name. In terms of its content, the < > is an encyclopedia, its rich and profound thought, covering the legal, political, military, economic many aspects of science and technology, etc. in the < > pipe many ideas, especially the legal thought of the most prominent. The legal system on the record books, is the study of pre Qin legal rare data. The > Law on the origin, nature and function of law, legislation and implementation aspects the discussion, incisive and profound; some famous assertion, such as "rule by law", are still in use. Only we should advocate and to investigate its legal thoughts, we will be able to "pipe system > is an overall grasp.
< > in the pipe system and the abundant legal thoughts, its legislative thought occupies an important position. The > comprehensively expounds the legislation should comply with the law, legislation should comply with the aspirations of the people; from time to time, and according to the customs; legislation should be moderate, the principle of transparency and a series of legislation on the base. There is no doubt that these shows beyond rational light era, is still of great significance.
Over the years, scholars have respectively from the aspects of Legal Thought on "pipes are explored and elaborated on the characteristics of their research. Or his legal thoughts, and discusses its legal concept, or analyze the difference with Qin Jin calligrapher, or study the legislation, law enforcement, or investigating the relationship between law and other social the relationship or culture, but further investigating legislative thought the article is rare. The people comprehend the legal thoughts of the pre Qin period has caused certain effects. For this reason, the extensive collection of information reference, drawing on related research results, using historical analysis, dialectical method the content and characteristics, combing the idea of legislation of < > tube, in order to comprehensively and systematically show the whole theory of legislation < >.
< > Research on tube legislative thought is of great significance to the contemporary Chinese legal system, which embodies the harmony between man and nature, law and morality, family harmony thought not only can and should be fully absorbed, for today's legal construction services for the construction of socialism harmonious society. We only based on Chinese the traditional culture, absorb its essence, combined with the situation of contemporary Chinese, to establish the legal system of contemporary China, in order to achieve the real rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號(hào)】:B226.1;D909.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 張連偉;;論《管子》的禮與法[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年09期
2 張媛;再論“厭訟”心理的根基[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年10期
3 許建良;;《管子》“教訓(xùn)成俗”的道德教化論[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期
4 李增;《管子》法思想[J];管子學(xué)刊;2001年01期
5 王人博;一個(gè)最低限度的法治概念——對(duì)中國法家思想的現(xiàn)代闡釋[J];法學(xué)論壇;2003年01期
6 王敬華;;《管子》的“道法”觀及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值[J];唯實(shí);2008年06期
7 謝鵬程;;論社會(huì)主義法治理念[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年01期
,本文編號(hào):1550377
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/1550377.html