本文關鍵詞： 清代 私借官民資財 罪責　出處：《蘇州大學》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 中國古代嚴厲追究官吏私借官民資財?shù)淖镓?在唐代之前無獨立罪名,對這類行為的懲罰是用一般贓罪的規(guī)定進行規(guī)范,直到《唐律疏議》中才出現(xiàn)了獨立的罪名,并用比較規(guī)范的法律術語表達。經過后來的發(fā)展,至清代此類規(guī)定達到最完備的狀態(tài),本文分四個部分考察《大清律例》中追究官吏私借官民資財罪責的規(guī)定,希望對現(xiàn)行法律懲戒國家工作人員私借國有資財?shù)男袨橛兴鶈⑹尽?第一部分,闡述清代前官吏私借官民資財罪責之沿革。官吏私借官民資產的行為同于贓罪。唐之前無獨立罪名規(guī)范官吏私借行為,至唐出現(xiàn)獨立罪名規(guī)范私借行為;第二部分,闡述清代相關立法優(yōu)于前代。比較了清代相關規(guī)定優(yōu)于明代和唐代。其次從清初社會現(xiàn)狀、對明朝法律的繼承、滿洲族的民族特點等方面論述了清代此規(guī)定完備的原因;第三部分,闡述清代相關立法與現(xiàn)代西方的規(guī)定在罪名的規(guī)定及懲罰方面有暗合之處;第四部分,清代立法對當代的啟示。我國現(xiàn)行刑法在規(guī)定國家工作人員私借國家資產方面僅在挪用公款罪和挪用救災、搶險、防汛、優(yōu)撫、扶貧、移民、救濟款物等作出規(guī)定,對挪用其他國家資產無規(guī)定。清代懲戒官吏私借官民資財?shù)囊?guī)定在罪名設置和嚴懲方面給我們以啟示。
[Abstract]:In ancient China, officials were severely investigated for the crime of borrowing money from officials and people, and there were no independent charges before the Tang Dynasty. The punishment for such acts was regulated by the provisions of the general crime of stolen goods, and it was not until the "Tang Law sparsely discussed" that the independent charges appeared. After the later development, such provisions reached the most complete state in the Qing Dynasty. This paper examines the provisions of investigating the criminal responsibility of officials for borrowing money from officials and people in four parts in the Qing Dynasty. The author hopes to enlighten the current law to punish the state functionary's private borrowing of state assets. In the first part, the author expounds the evolution of the criminal responsibility of government officials for borrowing money from officials and people before the Qing Dynasty. The behavior of officials borrowing assets from officials to the people is the same as the crime of stolen goods. Before the Tang Dynasty, there were no independent charges to regulate the private borrowing of officials, and until the Tang Dynasty, there were independent charges to regulate private borrowing. The second part expounds that the relevant legislation of Qing Dynasty is superior to that of the previous dynasties. It compares the relevant provisions of the Qing Dynasty with those of the Ming Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty. Secondly, it inherits the laws of the Ming Dynasty from the current social situation in the early Qing Dynasty. Manchuria ethnic characteristics and other aspects of the Qing Dynasty discussed the reasons for the completion of this provision; the third part, the relevant legislation of the Qing Dynasty and modern western provisions in the provisions of the crime and punishment has a hidden place; part 4th, The enlightenment of the legislation of the Qing Dynasty to the contemporary era. The current criminal law of our country stipulates that state functionaries should only provide for the crime of misappropriating public funds and misappropriating disaster relief, emergency relief, flood control, preferential care, poverty alleviation, immigration, relief funds, etc. There is no provision for misappropriating the assets of other countries.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D924.3;D929

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳淑麗;呂麗;;明代官吏職務犯罪問題研究[J];當代法學;2006年01期

2 童建明;關于挪用公款罪的若干問題之管見[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1989年06期

3 程天權;從唐六贓到明六贓[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);1984年06期

4 薛梅卿;;中國古代懲貪法律的實施及其昭示[J];法學家;1996年04期

5 萬方;略論我國古代懲貪法制[J];河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1993年04期

6 阮方民;;我國懲治貪污罪的歷史沿革及其特點[J];杭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1988年01期

7 呂鶴云;;中國古代刑律中有關官吏贓罪的探究[J];華中師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1987年04期

8 詹學東;挪用與貪污[J];審計與理財;2005年10期

9 潘世欽;《唐律》懲貪治吏思想淺析[J];江西師范大學學報;1997年02期

10 王駿;中國古代懲治貪贓罪的刑法制度探析[J];寧波工程學院學報;2005年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 陳一容;清代官吏懲戒制度研究[D];西南師范大學;2005年

2 王莉;唐代懲貪法律制度研究[D];安徽大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1549942