本文關鍵詞： 個人信息保護 一般人格權 基本權利 信息自決權　出處：《中國政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：信息時代,公民的個人信息逐漸成為最重要的社會資源,但伴隨對個人信息價值認識的提升,公民個人信息的安全問題也成為一大社會熱點難題。國家應該從法律保護的角度,對個人信息的安全進行維護。本文嘗試從德國法的視角展開討論,為我國個人信息的法律保護提供新的材料。 文章首先對一些易混淆的概念作出了區(qū)分和解釋,對個人信息的概念展開了介紹,并進而給出了作者的基本觀點,即拋棄以隱私權為中心的美式個人信息保護模式,而采用德國統(tǒng)一立法保護的個人信息保護模式。 德國模式以公民一般人格權的保護作為公民個人信息保護的起點,通過判例確立了一項新的憲法基本權利——信息自決權。信息自決權作為一般人格權在信息時代的新發(fā)展,維護公民個人信息免受國家和第三人的非法侵犯,賦予了公民對個人信息的控制權利。 在論文的第二章,作者展示了德國個人信息立法保護的歷史進程,結合背景時代,給出了立法現(xiàn)象后的本質解釋。內容以時間發(fā)展為線索,為讀者快速勾勒了德國《個人數(shù)據(jù)保護法》的發(fā)展史。其后,在本文的第三章,作者將目光聚集于德國《聯(lián)邦數(shù)據(jù)保護法》之上,詳細而具體的展示了2009年《聯(lián)邦數(shù)據(jù)保護法》的結構、內容、基本原則和權利義務。讓讀者對德國的個人信息保護立法能有一個更為直觀和具體的了解。 在詳細介紹了德國個人信息保護的立法制度后,作者將視角轉入中國法領域,在第四章對我國的立法保護現(xiàn)狀做了一個直觀分析,采取了數(shù)據(jù)圖表的形式,展示了現(xiàn)階段法律對公民個人信息的直接及間接保護,并建議將德國法的人格權保護模式引入中國,將個人信息自決權作為個人信息保護問題的基礎權利。進而作者在第五章就我國信息自決權的權利基礎進行了證成,分別從民法和憲法角度對信息自決權進行了確權分析。最后在第六章,作者就我國所應采取的個人信息保護模式展開討論,在比較了美國的分散立法模式和德國的統(tǒng)一立法模式以后,提出建立我國特有的以統(tǒng)一立法為主,兼具行業(yè)自律的保護模式的建議。
[Abstract]:In the information age, citizens' personal information has gradually become the most important social resource, but with the promotion of the value of personal information, the security of citizens' personal information has become a hot social problem. This paper attempts to discuss the security of personal information from the perspective of German law and provide new materials for the legal protection of personal information in China. This paper first distinguishes and explains some confusing concepts, introduces the concept of personal information, and then gives the author's basic point of view, that is, abandoning the American-style personal information protection model centered on the right of privacy. And adopts the German unified legislation protection personal information protection pattern. The German model regards the protection of the citizen's general personality right as the starting point of the citizen's personal information protection, and establishes a new constitutional basic right, the right of information self-determination, which is the new development of the general personality right in the information age. To protect citizens' personal information from illegal encroachment by the state and the third party endows citizens with the right to control personal information. In the second chapter of the paper, the author shows the historical process of the legislative protection of personal information in Germany, and, combined with the background times, gives the essential explanation of the legislative phenomenon. The content takes the time development as the clue. Then, in the third chapter, the author focuses on the Federal data Protection Act of Germany. The structure, content, basic principles and rights and obligations of the Federal data Protection Act of 2009 are presented in detail. After introducing the legislative system of personal information protection in Germany in detail, the author turns the angle of view to the field of Chinese law, and in Chapter 4th makes an intuitive analysis of the current situation of legislative protection in our country, and adopts the form of data chart. It shows the direct and indirect protection of citizen's personal information by law at the present stage, and proposes to introduce the protection mode of personality right of German law into China. Taking the right to self-determination of personal information as the basic right of personal information protection, the author proves the right basis of the right to self-determination of information in China in Chapter 5th. Finally, in Chapter 6th, the author discusses the mode of personal information protection in China. After comparing the decentralized legislative model in the United States with the unified legislative model in Germany, this paper puts forward some suggestions for establishing a unique protection model in our country, which is based on uniform legislation and has self-discipline in the industry.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D951.6;D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 馬民虎;馮立楊;;德國聯(lián)邦數(shù)據(jù)保護法的發(fā)展趨勢[J];圖書與情報;2009年01期

2 蔣舸;;個人信息保護法立法模式的選擇——以德國經驗為視角[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2011年02期

3 冷傳莉;;論人格物與一般人格權的內在契合[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2013年04期

4 齊愛民;中華人民共和國個人信息保護法示范法草案學者建議稿[J];河北法學;2005年06期

5 上官丕亮;;論憲法上的人格尊嚴[J];江蘇社會科學;2008年02期

6 朱振,都本有;人格權的倫理分析[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2005年03期

7 梅紹祖;個人信息保護的基礎性問題研究[J];蘇州大學學報;2005年02期

8 王利明;;論個人信息權在人格權法中的地位[J];蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年06期

9 謝立斌;;中德比較憲法視野下的人格尊嚴——兼與林來梵教授商榷[J];政法論壇;2010年04期

，

本文編號：1502462