發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-18 13:32

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：張某、楊某交通肇事暨附帶民事案評(píng)析　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 交通肇事 共同犯罪 逃逸 先刑后民 書面審理

【摘要】：張某、楊某交通肇事暨附帶民事案件中存在六大爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)，即張某、楊某能否共同承擔(dān)交通事故的全部責(zé)任；張某、楊某是否構(gòu)成交通肇事罪；是否屬于共同犯罪；張某在做完筆錄后一直在逃，是否構(gòu)成交通肇事逃逸；楊某在逃，能否對(duì)張某、楊某提起附帶民事訴訟；二審能否書面審理否定一審認(rèn)定的湯某是實(shí)際車主、也是雇主的事實(shí)，直接改判湯某不需要承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任。通過對(duì)本案評(píng)析后認(rèn)為，張某、楊某應(yīng)共同承擔(dān)交通事故的全部責(zé)任，兩人均構(gòu)成了交通肇事罪，但不構(gòu)成交通肇事罪的“共犯”，張某為逃避法律追究而逃跑在外的行為不構(gòu)成交通肇事罪逃逸，但是存在“脫逃”行為，在刑民交叉案件中需要考慮先刑后民原則的例外情形，，二審沒有調(diào)查和詢問被害人及其訴訟代理人，沒有查出另外的登記車主或?qū)嶋H車主，沒有新的事實(shí)、證據(jù)或者理由，不應(yīng)書面審理直接改判湯某不需要承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Zhang, Yang traffic accident and incidental civil cases in the existence of six major dispute focus, that is, Zhang, Yang can jointly bear the full responsibility of traffic accidents; Zhang, whether Yang constitutes a traffic accident crime; Whether it is a joint crime; Zhang has been at large after the record, whether it constitutes a hit-and-run traffic escape; Yang is at large, can Zhang, Yang Mou incidental civil action; Whether the second trial can be written to deny the first instance that Tang is the actual owner, but also the facts of the employer, directly modified Tang does not need to bear joint and several liability. Through the assessment of the case, Zhang Mou. Yang should bear the full responsibility of the traffic accident, both constitute a traffic accident crime, but does not constitute a traffic accident crime "accomplice." Zhang's behavior of escaping from the outside in order to evade legal investigation does not constitute the escape of traffic accident crime, but there is a "escape" behavior, and the exception of the principle of first punishment and then the principle of people should be considered in the cross-criminal case. The second instance did not investigate and question the victims and their representatives ad litem, did not identify additional registered or actual owners, and did not have new facts, evidence or reasons. Should not be written trial directly modified Tang Mou does not need to assume joint and several liability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3;D920.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 陳興良,胡建生,朱平,李克;關(guān)于“先刑后民”司法原則的反思[J];北京市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

2 謝萍;交通肇事犯罪案件中的問題及法律適用[J];山東審判;2003年02期

本文編號(hào)：1441186