本文關(guān)鍵詞：淺析兩宋證據(jù)制度　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 兩宋 證據(jù)制度 程序

【摘要】： 由于中國古代特殊的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化,產(chǎn)生了獨樹一幟的證據(jù)制度,以兩宋的證據(jù)制度尤為發(fā)達(dá)。但長期以來,基于各方面的原因,學(xué)者大多注重研究唐朝的證據(jù)制度,即使研究兩宋的證據(jù)制度也多注重于檢驗制度,而忽視了對其他證據(jù)形式及其特點的研究。不可否認(rèn),唐朝證據(jù)制度和兩宋檢驗制度的重要性,但兩宋時期的證據(jù)制度也具有其特色,某些方面具有超前性,因此,值得我們?nèi)パ芯刻接憽１疚臄M在已有著作的基礎(chǔ)上著重從以下幾個方面去全面的淺析兩宋證據(jù)制度:首先著重介紹兩宋多樣的證據(jù)種類,而不僅僅只是其檢驗制度。從中發(fā)現(xiàn)兩宋具有發(fā)達(dá)的書證制度,書證廣泛應(yīng)用于各類案件,特別是民事田產(chǎn)糾紛中,甚至出現(xiàn)了專門的鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)書鋪,這在中國古代是前所未有的。而且在一些案件當(dāng)中物證的證明力高于口供,有時即使取得了口供也不能判案,這在一定上表明口供主義地位的動搖,對于口供主義盛行的古代中國而言,這無疑是歷史的進(jìn)步;其次本文從兩宋證據(jù)種類出現(xiàn),發(fā)現(xiàn)兩宋證據(jù)制度具有鮮明特點,并不是一味地繼承唐朝的證據(jù)制度,諸如注重對證人的保護(hù)、注重譎術(shù)判案以及出現(xiàn)了初級的國家賠償制度等,這在以前是很少見的。再次以其鮮明的特點為基礎(chǔ),分析其發(fā)達(dá)的原因,得出兩宋證據(jù)制度之所以有如此鮮明的特點,在當(dāng)時的歷史背景下,不是偶然而是必然;最后,從實事求是的精神出發(fā),為了更全面的了解兩宋證據(jù)制度,對其弊端進(jìn)行了淺析,并著眼于當(dāng)代中國證據(jù)制度的完善,提出幾點建議。
[Abstract]:Because of the special politics, economy and culture in ancient China, the evidence system of the two Song dynasties was developed, but for a long time, it was based on various reasons. Scholars mostly pay attention to the study of the evidence system of Tang Dynasty. Even the study of the evidence system of the two Song dynasties also pays more attention to the inspection system, while neglecting the study of other forms of evidence and their characteristics. The evidence system of the Tang Dynasty and the inspection system of the Song Dynasty are important, but the evidence system of the two Song dynasties also has its own characteristics. On the basis of the existing works, this paper focuses on the following aspects to comprehensively analyze the two Song Dynasty evidence system: first of all, the introduction of the various types of evidence in the Song Dynasty. It was found that the Song Dynasty had developed book certificate system, which was widely used in all kinds of cases, especially in civil disputes of land property, and even appeared a special appraisal institution. This is unprecedented in ancient China. And in some cases, the material evidence is higher than the confession, sometimes even if the confession can not be decided, which in a certain degree shows that the status of confession wavered. For ancient China, where confession doctrine is prevalent, this is undoubtedly the progress of history. Secondly, from the emergence of the two Song Dynasty evidence, we find that the two Song Dynasty evidence system has distinct characteristics, is not blindly inherited the Tang Dynasty evidence system, such as focusing on the protection of witnesses. Pay attention to the treacherous judgment and the emergence of the primary state compensation system, which is very rare in the past. Again, based on its distinctive characteristics, analysis of the reasons for its development. It is concluded that the reason why the evidence system of the Song Dynasty has such distinctive characteristics is not accidental but inevitable in the historical background at that time. Finally, from the spirit of seeking truth from facts, in order to fully understand the evidence system of the two Song dynasties, this paper analyzes its drawbacks, and puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the evidence system in contemporary China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D929;D925;K244

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 雷建昌;;論口供的法律地位[J];中共成都市委黨校學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué));2006年01期

2 黃瑞亭;《洗冤集錄》與宋慈的法律學(xué)術(shù)思想[J];法律與醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

3 朱勇;;論宋代法制文明及其歷史貢獻(xiàn)[J];河北法學(xué);2008年03期

4 郭東旭;黃道誠;;宋代檢驗制度探微[J];河北法學(xué);2008年07期

5 何家弘;司法證明方式和證據(jù)規(guī)則的歷史沿革——對西方證據(jù)法的再認(rèn)識[J];外國法譯評;1999年04期

6 莫家齊;;南宋民事訴訟證據(jù)制度管見——兼論中國古代不采法定證據(jù)制度[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1985年02期

7 黃道誠;;宋代司法檢驗的制度化、法律化[J];云南社會科學(xué);2008年01期

8 范忠信;中國親屬容隱制度的歷程、規(guī)律及啟示[J];政法論壇;1997年04期

9 范忠信;中西法律傳統(tǒng)中的“親親相隱”[J];中國社會科學(xué);1997年03期

，

本文編號：1430347