本文關(guān)鍵詞：走向認知科學的法學研究——從法學與科學的關(guān)系切入　出處：《法學家》2015年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 法律認知科學 法律社會科學 法學 科學 垂直整合

【摘要】：從知識史的角度看,法學與科學的交匯,呈現(xiàn)出法律社會科學與法律認知科學兩波前后相繼的浪潮。這一趨勢促使法律學者重新反思法學與科學的關(guān)系。傳統(tǒng)法學基于"意義無涉"與"價值無涉"兩點理由,拒絕對法律問題的科學研究,但這種自我辯護忽視了法律實踐的規(guī)約性特征和法律價值的科學基礎(chǔ)。法律認知科學的溫和科學主義研究方式,從新的角度解決法學的固有問題,有助于法律的工具價值與目的價值之實現(xiàn)。在垂直整合的框架中,認知科學、社會科學和傳統(tǒng)法學各自占據(jù)不同的位置,以合理分工的方式推進法學學術(shù)的發(fā)展,追求人類知識大匯聚的智識理想。引言過去幾百年間,科學確立了人類理智探索外在自然世界的最高典范。這種典范轉(zhuǎn)換,超越單一學科的邊界,推動著人類知識的變革。和其它人文與社會學科相比,古老的法學似乎有著更強的保守氣質(zhì)。~①法學,在其誕生之初就是職業(yè)性的知識體系,更多地包含著專家技藝與專門知識。作為職業(yè)性的實用知識,法學并非典型的人文學問,并不直接關(guān)切人的處境(human condition);而在另
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the history of knowledge, the intersection of law and science. There are two successive waves of law, social science and legal cognitive science. This trend urges legal scholars to rethink the relationship between law and science. Traditional jurisprudence is based on "no meaning" and "no value". Two reasons. But this self-defense neglects the statutory characteristics of legal practice and the scientific basis of legal value, as well as the moderate scientism research method of legal cognitive science. Solving the inherent problems of law from a new angle is helpful to the realization of the instrumental value and the objective value of law. In the framework of vertical integration, cognitive science, social science and traditional law occupy different positions. To promote the development of legal science in a rational division of labor and to pursue the intellectual ideal of the great convergence of human knowledge. Science has established the highest model for human reason to explore the external natural world. This paradigm transformation transcends the boundary of a single discipline and promotes the transformation of human knowledge. Compared with other humanities and social disciplines. The ancient jurisprudence seems to have a stronger conservative temperament. At the beginning of its birth, it is a professional knowledge system, which contains more professional skills and expertise, as a professional practical knowledge. Law is not a typical humanism, and it is not directly concerned about the human condition. And in the other place,
【作者單位】： 浙江大學光華法學院;
【基金】：浙江省哲學社會科學規(guī)劃課題“認知心理學視野中的法律推理研究”(14NDJC116YB)的資助
【分類號】：D90
【正文快照】： 引言過去幾百年間,科學確立了人類理智探索外在自然世界的最高典范。這種典范轉(zhuǎn)換,超越單一學科的邊界,推動著人類知識的變革。和其它人文與社會學科相比,古老的法學似乎有著更強的保守氣質(zhì)。#174;法學,在其誕生之初就是職業(yè)性的知識體系,更多地包含著專家技藝與專門知識。作

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 屈茂輝;匡凱;;傳統(tǒng)法學的幾何學范式論析[J];法學家;2014年03期

2 鄧矜婷;;新法律現(xiàn)實主義的最新發(fā)展與啟示[J];法學家;2014年04期

3 舒國瀅;尋訪法學的問題立場——兼談“論題學法學”的思考方式[J];法學研究;2005年03期

4 王凌v，

本文編號：1429135