本文關(guān)鍵詞：清代親屬間“威逼人致死”研究　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： “威逼人致死”條 親屬 情理法

【摘要】：明清律法中的“威逼人致死”條頗有別于現(xiàn)代刑法理論，而對(duì)于該條的相關(guān)研究亦不在少數(shù)，但現(xiàn)有研究多是擷取案件以說明中國(guó)古代法律文化的某一方面。本文希望透過案件材料和司法規(guī)范，分析清代司法官員處斷該類案件的模式和原則，以及“親屬”這一前提在該類案件的處斷中的作用和影響，最后得出一般性的結(jié)論。 本文論題主要是針對(duì)死者和責(zé)任者之間存在親屬關(guān)系的“威逼人致死”案件進(jìn)行探討。本文結(jié)構(gòu)由導(dǎo)言、正文四章和結(jié)語組成，4萬字有余。 導(dǎo)言部分，首先介紹了選題依據(jù)，進(jìn)而回顧了對(duì)“威逼人致死”條的現(xiàn)有研究狀況，通過文獻(xiàn)綜述的梳理，來尋求本文研究的著力點(diǎn)和行文空間。 正文第一章主要介紹了“親屬”這一概念的界定以及“威逼人致死”條這一條文的內(nèi)容和內(nèi)涵，其中對(duì)“服制”、“法律”以及和“親屬”之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了討論；對(duì)條文的解析上，區(qū)分了一般條文和特殊條文，，以及明文涉及“親屬”字眼或“親屬”關(guān)系的律例，運(yùn)用文字和表格（對(duì)應(yīng)表格見附錄一）結(jié)合的方式加以說明。 第二章和第三章意在對(duì)“威逼人致死”中涉及親屬關(guān)系的案件進(jìn)行類型化分析，將案件類型分為“奸非肇事”類和“因事而犯”，而在這兩大類型之下，又析分出“祖父母、父母與子孫之間”、“夫妻之間”以及“其他親屬之間”，這樣區(qū)分的目的在于切合本文的研究宗旨，且在閱讀上也更簡(jiǎn)潔明了。在案件的具體分析中，分為兩個(gè)小節(jié)：首先對(duì)案件進(jìn)行量化分析，以表格和文字相結(jié)合的形式作整體性的說明；其次結(jié)合具體的個(gè)案對(duì)該類案件的審判和法律適用進(jìn)行了分析。 第四章的主要內(nèi)容在于對(duì)親屬間“威逼人致死”案件的審理模式和案件的法律運(yùn)用進(jìn)行概括性的分析。 最后結(jié)語部分，得出結(jié)論清代司法官員在律例的基礎(chǔ)架構(gòu)上，運(yùn)用人情、禮、道德、天理天道等漸層式的整體規(guī)范概念，不斷地對(duì)于刑罰的妥適性加以評(píng)判，融合法與禮、情理、道德，做出符合形式上之用法要求并兼顧實(shí)質(zhì)妥當(dāng)性的判決。
[Abstract]:The Ming and Qing Dynasties of the law "with a lethal threat" is quite different from the modern theory of criminal law, and for the related research in this article is not in the minority, but the existing research is to illustrate a case retrieval China ancient legal culture. This paper hope that through the case materials and judicial norms, patterns and principles of judicial officials in Qing Dynasty. Off the case, and the effect of this premise and "relatives" in the case of breaking the role, finally draw the general conclusions.
The topic of this paper is mainly about the case of "threatening death" between relatives of the deceased and the responsible persons. The structure is composed of the introduction, the four chapters and the epilogue, and there are more than 4 words.
The introductory part first introduces the basis of topic selection, and then reviews the existing research status of "threatening death by human force". Through literature review, it seeks the focus and writing space of this research.
The first chapter mainly introduces the content and connotation of the concept of relatives "and" Wei threatening death "this provision, the" system "," law "and" the relationship between relatives "is discussed; on the provisions of the resolution, the distinction between the general provisions and special provisions. And the statutes expressly relates to" relative "word or" relatives ", the use of text and tables (see Appendix table corresponding to a combination of examples.)
The second chapter and the third chapter is to analyses the types of "kinship with Wei involved in the case of death", the case will be divided into two kinds of "rape non accident" and "because it made", and under the two major types, and analysis of the difference between the grandparents, parents and children, between husband and wife between "and other" relatives ", this distinction is to study with the purpose, and in reading is also more concise. In the case of the specific analysis, divided into two sections: the first quantitative analysis of the case, to form and text combined form as a whole explanation; secondly, the trial and application of law are analyzed combined with specific cases.
The main content of the fourth chapter is the general analysis of the trial mode and the legal application of the cases "threatening to death" between relatives.
The last part, the conclusion of judicial officials in Qing Dynasty statutes infrastructure, the use of human, propriety, morality, etc. the overall standard heaven heaven cascading concept, constantly for the appropriateness of the penalty judgment, fusion method and ritual, reason, moral, make use of both substantive requirements and formal. The decision.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D929;D924;K249

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 霍存福;;唆訟、嚇財(cái)、撓法:清代官府眼中的訟師[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

2 王志強(qiáng);清代成案的效力和其運(yùn)用中的論證方式——以《刑案匯覽》為中心[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年03期

3 馬建紅;親屬·服制·法律[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年04期

4 徐忠明;明清訴訟:官方的態(tài)度與民間的策略[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2004年10期

5 劉廣安;二十世紀(jì)中國(guó)法律史學(xué)論綱[J];中外法學(xué);1997年03期

本文編號(hào)：1393126