偵查策略合法性的理論界限和實(shí)踐運(yùn)用
[Abstract]:Investigation strategy refers to the lawful and flexible and effective method adopted by the subject of investigation in order to achieve a certain object of investigation in the course of carrying out the investigation behavior (person, object, place). The investigation of each case has the design and application of investigation strategy. In practice, the legality of investigation strategy is often disputed due to the lack of uniform judgment standard. The systematic study on the theoretical limits of the legality of investigation strategy has certain guiding significance for judging the legality of investigation strategy, advancing the investigation work smoothly and correctly judging the legality of evidence in criminal justice. This paper tries to clarify the theoretical limits of the legality of investigation strategies from the point of seeking the commonality of the standards of legality of various investigative strategies, and then to investigate the practical application of various typical investigative strategies in order to enrich the theory of investigation strategies. The paper consists of three parts, about 42000 words. The first part mainly discusses the concept of investigation strategy legality. This part begins with the analysis of the concept of investigation strategy, analyzes the basic characteristics of investigation strategy, and defines the connotation of investigation strategy. On this basis, the investigation strategy and investigative measures are distinguished. As to legitimacy, this paper starts with the question of "what is law", and then, on the basis of borrowing the concepts of legitimacy of political science, philosophy of law and so on, defines the concept of legitimacy in this paper, and distinguishes between legitimacy and legitimacy. The content of the legality of investigation strategy is further analyzed, that is, the evaluation standard of legality, the evaluation of philosophy, the evaluation of law and so on. The second part studies the theoretical limits of investigation strategy legality. Because of the lack of direct regulation of investigation strategy on the legal level, therefore, in the study of the limits of the theoretical circle of the legality of investigation strategy, it should not be limited to the legal level, but should have a broader vision, which is in line with the basic spirit and principles of the law. And can effectively promote the theoretical support of investigation. In the legal boundary, the design and application of investigation strategy need to meet the legal subject and legal means. Legal means mainly include prohibiting the use of tactics that may lead to false evidence, prohibiting the enforcement of investigative strategies against the provisions of the Constitution and the law, prohibiting investigative strategies that infringe upon the right of the relative person to freedom of will and abstinence of investigative tactics. In the aspect of scientific evaluation standard, investigation strategy should be effective and economical. In addition, the legality standard of investigation strategy also has the moral limit. The third part studies the practice and application of investigation strategy legality. Investigation strategies can be divided into different types according to different standards. It is clearly stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law, but widely used in practice, such as threats, lures and deceptions, has its own standards in the application of its legality. The investigative strategies mainly include questioning witnesses, interrogating criminal suspects, enticing investigation, controlled delivery and secret investigation. These investigation strategies are widely used in practice, and the judgment of legality is controversial, there is no uniform standard, it is typical, it is necessary to study separately.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號(hào)】:D631.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐慶軒;試論刑事偵查謀略的設(shè)計(jì)[J];福建公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào).社會(huì)公共安全研究;2001年02期
2 鄧立軍,吳良培;控制下交付論綱[J];福建公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期
3 龍宗智;威脅、引誘、欺騙的審訊是否違法[J];法學(xué);2000年03期
4 瞿豐;偵查成本論[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期
5 畢惜茜;偵查訊問策略運(yùn)用的法律界限[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期
6 駱緒剛;王榮利;;賄賂犯罪案件誘惑偵查之適用[J];公安研究;2007年12期
7 鄭曉均;;論偵查策略的本質(zhì)及特征[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期
8 艾明;反思與重構(gòu):論我國誘惑偵查制度的法治化[J];湖南公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期
9 王力一;;智能和偵查智能辨析[J];湖南公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
10 葉劍波;;論誘惑偵查中的謀略設(shè)計(jì)[J];北京人民警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 蔣開富;偵查策略正當(dāng)性原理[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號(hào):2371272
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2371272.html