【摘要】：非法營(yíng)運(yùn)是多年以來(lái)許多地方都存在至今的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,它一方面擾亂了正常的交通營(yíng)運(yùn)秩序,損害了合法營(yíng)運(yùn)者的利益,另一方面因?yàn)檐?chē)況不一、車(chē)輛保險(xiǎn)不齊備等給乘客帶來(lái)直接或間接的生命財(cái)產(chǎn)威脅,嚴(yán)重影響了城市形象,影響了社會(huì)穩(wěn)定,已然成為了政府社會(huì)治理中的一大難題。本文通過(guò)對(duì)成都市龍泉驛區(qū)處置“10.27”電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)事件的案例進(jìn)行研究,深入剖析了龍泉驛區(qū)在治理電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)過(guò)程中存在的依據(jù)不詳實(shí),體制不健全、機(jī)制不順暢的問(wèn)題;分析了該區(qū)并沒(méi)有通過(guò)處置電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)者使其受到足夠的懲罰,合法經(jīng)營(yíng)者也沒(méi)有因此使其利益得到更加有效的維護(hù),乘客利益并未因此獲得直接的提高和保護(hù);對(duì)比國(guó)家有關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對(duì)龍泉驛區(qū)的城市化水平、常住人口數(shù)量與出租車(chē)、公交車(chē)配置實(shí)有情況進(jìn)行分析,指出了其公共交通供不應(yīng)求的根本問(wèn)題。通過(guò)實(shí)證研究和文獻(xiàn)研究論證,找到了龍泉驛區(qū)處置電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)不成功的根本原因在于以“堵”為主,而不是以滿(mǎn)足人民群眾出行需求為出發(fā)點(diǎn)的根本性錯(cuò)誤。在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外研究情況,總結(jié)了治理電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),得出了必須理順治理電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)的機(jī)制,確保權(quán)責(zé)一致;必須打破現(xiàn)有的利益格局、通過(guò)改革出租車(chē)管理制度,研究“專(zhuān)車(chē)”服務(wù)等措施來(lái)壓縮電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)的生存空間;必須把發(fā)展多種形式的公共交通供給作為治理電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)的第一要?jiǎng)?wù)的重要啟示。只有通過(guò)這些措施的綜合運(yùn)用,才能有效治理電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)。因電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)占據(jù)了龍泉驛區(qū)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)車(chē)輛90%以上的力量,雖然摩托車(chē)、私家車(chē)等也是非法營(yíng)運(yùn)的重要載體,但不是本文研究重點(diǎn),僅在文中少量涉及,不做深入探討。
[Abstract]:Illegal operation is a social phenomenon that has existed in many places for many years now. On the one hand, it disturbs the normal traffic order and damages the interests of legal operators, on the other hand, it is because of different traffic conditions. The lack of vehicle insurance has brought direct or indirect threat to passengers' life and property, seriously affected the image of the city, affected social stability, and has become a major problem in the government's social governance. Based on the case study of handling the illegal operation of "10.27" electric tricycle in Longquanyi District of Chengdu, this paper deeply analyzes the existing basis and system in the process of controlling the illegal operation of electric tricycle in Longquanyi District. The problem that the mechanism is not smooth is analyzed, and it is analyzed that the illegal operators of electric tricycles are not adequately punished by the disposal of the illegal operators of electric tricycles in the region, and the legitimate operators are not thus able to protect their interests more effectively. Passenger interests have not been directly improved and protected as a result; in contrast to relevant national standards, the urbanization level, the number of permanent residents and the allocation of taxis and buses in Longquanyi District are analyzed. The paper points out the fundamental problem that the supply of public transportation exceeds supply. Through empirical research and literature research, it is found that the fundamental reason for the unsuccessful handling of the illegal operation of electric tricycles in Longquanyi District lies in the "blocking" rather than the fundamental mistake of meeting the travel needs of the people. On this basis, combined with the domestic and foreign research situation, summarized the experience and lessons of controlling the illegal operation of electric tricycle, drew the conclusion that the mechanism of controlling illegal operation of electric tricycle must be straightened out to ensure the consistency of power and responsibility, and the existing pattern of interests must be broken. Through the reform of taxi management system, the study of "special car" services and other measures to reduce the illegal operation of electric tricycle living space; The development of various forms of public transport supply must be regarded as the most important task of controlling the illegal operation of electric tricycles. Only through the comprehensive application of these measures, can we effectively control the illegal operation of electric tricycles. Because electric tricycles occupy more than 90% of the power of illegal operation vehicles in Longquanyi District, although motorcycles and private cars are also important carriers of illegal operation, they are not the focal points of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D631.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;當(dāng)事人[J];視野;2011年21期

2 ;天津：破解電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)管理難題見(jiàn)成效[J];汽車(chē)與安全;2008年12期

3 湯志平;王永璐;何衛(wèi)東;喬時(shí)慶;;身在班組 心系災(zāi)區(qū)[J];現(xiàn)代班組;2008年06期

4 譚清虎;;擦鞋工老張[J];兵團(tuán)工運(yùn);2014年02期

5 黃海悠;;起訴電動(dòng)車(chē)撞愛(ài)犬需舉證[J];道路交通管理;2014年06期

6 孫晗;;治理電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)違法載客行為的調(diào)查與思考[J];山東交通科技;2012年05期

7 張東;;幾人上演“收購(gòu)”戲騙取農(nóng)民上萬(wàn)元[J];農(nóng)村百事通;2014年08期

8 邢壽和;;興化市政協(xié)持續(xù)建言城市交通建設(shè)管理[J];江蘇政協(xié);2014年07期

9 陸雷軍;;電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)管理難題及其對(duì)策[J];交通與運(yùn)輸;2011年05期

10 吳振祥;林璋;;本案在無(wú)需許可產(chǎn)品上加貼QS標(biāo)志及編號(hào)該如何定性?[J];福建質(zhì)量技術(shù)監(jiān)督;2011年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 仝德成 閆平 陳爾康;電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)“載著”豐縣前行[N];中國(guó)稅務(wù)報(bào);2006年

2 單長(zhǎng)豐邋張悅 本報(bào)記者 張道平;全國(guó)電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)六成豐縣造[N];中國(guó)縣域經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年

3 史偉中邋張棟;電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)是否屬于機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年

4 陋巷;街頭又現(xiàn)電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)[N];牡丹江日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

5 王玉貴邋實(shí)習(xí)生 郭瓊輝;我市部署電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)專(zhuān)項(xiàng)整治工作[N];南充日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 王玉貴邋實(shí)習(xí)生 郭瓊輝;絕不允許電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)[N];南充日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

7 王玉貴邋實(shí)習(xí)生 郭瓊輝;非法電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)必須取締[N];南充日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

8 李奎邋實(shí)習(xí)生 曹嘉玲;取締“電三輪”留下的啟示[N];南充日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

9 特約記者 林天貴 通訊員 湯明輝;市區(qū)電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)專(zhuān)項(xiàng)整治全面展開(kāi)[N];泰州日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

10 特約記者 林天貴 通訊員 湯明輝;市區(qū)全面整治電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)[N];泰州日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張奕煒;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)用電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)創(chuàng)新研究與設(shè)計(jì)[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

2 陳民;成都市龍泉驛區(qū)處置“10.27”電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)非法營(yíng)運(yùn)的案例研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2016年

3 王東平;基于MPPT算法的光伏電動(dòng)三輪車(chē)充電控制系統(tǒng)的研究[D];中國(guó)計(jì)量學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2192554