【摘要】：非法營運(yùn)是多年以來許多地方都存在至今的社會現(xiàn)象,它一方面擾亂了正常的交通營運(yùn)秩序,損害了合法營運(yùn)者的利益,另一方面因?yàn)檐嚊r不一、車輛保險不齊備等給乘客帶來直接或間接的生命財(cái)產(chǎn)威脅,嚴(yán)重影響了城市形象,影響了社會穩(wěn)定,已然成為了政府社會治理中的一大難題。本文通過對成都市龍泉驛區(qū)處置“10.27”電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)事件的案例進(jìn)行研究,深入剖析了龍泉驛區(qū)在治理電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)過程中存在的依據(jù)不詳實(shí),體制不健全、機(jī)制不順暢的問題;分析了該區(qū)并沒有通過處置電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)者使其受到足夠的懲罰,合法經(jīng)營者也沒有因此使其利益得到更加有效的維護(hù),乘客利益并未因此獲得直接的提高和保護(hù);對比國家有關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對龍泉驛區(qū)的城市化水平、常住人口數(shù)量與出租車、公交車配置實(shí)有情況進(jìn)行分析,指出了其公共交通供不應(yīng)求的根本問題。通過實(shí)證研究和文獻(xiàn)研究論證,找到了龍泉驛區(qū)處置電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)不成功的根本原因在于以“堵”為主,而不是以滿足人民群眾出行需求為出發(fā)點(diǎn)的根本性錯誤。在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外研究情況,總結(jié)了治理電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),得出了必須理順治理電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)的機(jī)制,確保權(quán)責(zé)一致;必須打破現(xiàn)有的利益格局、通過改革出租車管理制度,研究“專車”服務(wù)等措施來壓縮電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)的生存空間;必須把發(fā)展多種形式的公共交通供給作為治理電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)的第一要務(wù)的重要啟示。只有通過這些措施的綜合運(yùn)用,才能有效治理電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)。因電動三輪車占據(jù)了龍泉驛區(qū)非法營運(yùn)車輛90%以上的力量,雖然摩托車、私家車等也是非法營運(yùn)的重要載體,但不是本文研究重點(diǎn),僅在文中少量涉及,不做深入探討。
[Abstract]:Illegal operation is a social phenomenon that has existed in many places for many years now. On the one hand, it disturbs the normal traffic order and damages the interests of legal operators, on the other hand, it is because of different traffic conditions. The lack of vehicle insurance has brought direct or indirect threat to passengers' life and property, seriously affected the image of the city, affected social stability, and has become a major problem in the government's social governance. Based on the case study of handling the illegal operation of "10.27" electric tricycle in Longquanyi District of Chengdu, this paper deeply analyzes the existing basis and system in the process of controlling the illegal operation of electric tricycle in Longquanyi District. The problem that the mechanism is not smooth is analyzed, and it is analyzed that the illegal operators of electric tricycles are not adequately punished by the disposal of the illegal operators of electric tricycles in the region, and the legitimate operators are not thus able to protect their interests more effectively. Passenger interests have not been directly improved and protected as a result; in contrast to relevant national standards, the urbanization level, the number of permanent residents and the allocation of taxis and buses in Longquanyi District are analyzed. The paper points out the fundamental problem that the supply of public transportation exceeds supply. Through empirical research and literature research, it is found that the fundamental reason for the unsuccessful handling of the illegal operation of electric tricycles in Longquanyi District lies in the "blocking" rather than the fundamental mistake of meeting the travel needs of the people. On this basis, combined with the domestic and foreign research situation, summarized the experience and lessons of controlling the illegal operation of electric tricycle, drew the conclusion that the mechanism of controlling illegal operation of electric tricycle must be straightened out to ensure the consistency of power and responsibility, and the existing pattern of interests must be broken. Through the reform of taxi management system, the study of "special car" services and other measures to reduce the illegal operation of electric tricycle living space; The development of various forms of public transport supply must be regarded as the most important task of controlling the illegal operation of electric tricycles. Only through the comprehensive application of these measures, can we effectively control the illegal operation of electric tricycles. Because electric tricycles occupy more than 90% of the power of illegal operation vehicles in Longquanyi District, although motorcycles and private cars are also important carriers of illegal operation, they are not the focal points of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D631.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;當(dāng)事人[J];視野;2011年21期

2 ;天津：破解電動三輪車管理難題見成效[J];汽車與安全;2008年12期

3 湯志平;王永璐;何衛(wèi)東;喬時慶;;身在班組 心系災(zāi)區(qū)[J];現(xiàn)代班組;2008年06期

4 譚清虎;;擦鞋工老張[J];兵團(tuán)工運(yùn);2014年02期

5 黃海悠;;起訴電動車撞愛犬需舉證[J];道路交通管理;2014年06期

6 孫晗;;治理電動三輪車違法載客行為的調(diào)查與思考[J];山東交通科技;2012年05期

7 張東;;幾人上演“收購”戲騙取農(nóng)民上萬元[J];農(nóng)村百事通;2014年08期

8 邢壽和;;興化市政協(xié)持續(xù)建言城市交通建設(shè)管理[J];江蘇政協(xié);2014年07期

9 陸雷軍;;電動三輪車管理難題及其對策[J];交通與運(yùn)輸;2011年05期

10 吳振祥;林璋;;本案在無需許可產(chǎn)品上加貼QS標(biāo)志及編號該如何定性?[J];福建質(zhì)量技術(shù)監(jiān)督;2011年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 仝德成 閆平 陳爾康;電動三輪車“載著”豐縣前行[N];中國稅務(wù)報(bào);2006年

2 單長豐邋張悅 本報(bào)記者 張道平;全國電動三輪車六成豐縣造[N];中國縣域經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年

3 史偉中邋張棟;電動三輪車是否屬于機(jī)動車[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年

4 陋巷;街頭又現(xiàn)電動三輪車[N];牡丹江日報(bào);2006年

5 王玉貴邋實(shí)習(xí)生 郭瓊輝;我市部署電動三輪車專項(xiàng)整治工作[N];南充日報(bào);2007年

6 王玉貴邋實(shí)習(xí)生 郭瓊輝;絕不允許電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)[N];南充日報(bào);2007年

7 王玉貴邋實(shí)習(xí)生 郭瓊輝;非法電動三輪車必須取締[N];南充日報(bào);2007年

8 李奎邋實(shí)習(xí)生 曹嘉玲;取締“電三輪”留下的啟示[N];南充日報(bào);2007年

9 特約記者 林天貴 通訊員 湯明輝;市區(qū)電動三輪車專項(xiàng)整治全面展開[N];泰州日報(bào);2007年

10 特約記者 林天貴 通訊員 湯明輝;市區(qū)全面整治電動三輪車[N];泰州日報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張奕煒;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)用電動三輪車創(chuàng)新研究與設(shè)計(jì)[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

2 陳民;成都市龍泉驛區(qū)處置“10.27”電動三輪車非法營運(yùn)的案例研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2016年

3 王東平;基于MPPT算法的光伏電動三輪車充電控制系統(tǒng)的研究[D];中國計(jì)量學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號：2192554