【摘要】： 改革開放三十年來,隨著社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)蓬勃發(fā)展和我國(guó)體制改革的不斷深化,績(jī)效考評(píng)作為一種行政管理制度創(chuàng)新的方式和有效的行政管理工具,越來越受到重視,它取代了以往的投入、官僚程序和規(guī)則成為控制組織的手段。作為國(guó)家文明窗口行政執(zhí)法部門的出入境邊防檢查站,要實(shí)現(xiàn)公安部提出的“更親、更快、更嚴(yán)”的工作目標(biāo),建立全面科學(xué)有效的績(jī)效考評(píng)體系對(duì)出入境邊防檢查站管理過程中資源的產(chǎn)出結(jié)果進(jìn)行全面、系統(tǒng)的分析和評(píng)價(jià)已成為客觀需要。 新世紀(jì)以來,全國(guó)不少地方的邊防檢查站在績(jī)效考評(píng)方面進(jìn)行了積極探索,積累了經(jīng)驗(yàn),亦取得成效,但普遍存在理論準(zhǔn)備不足、職能定位不清、指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建科學(xué)性不夠、實(shí)施過程規(guī)范性不足等問題。結(jié)果導(dǎo)致考評(píng)往往流于形式,難以對(duì)績(jī)效改善起到真正的推進(jìn)作用。有鑒于此,本文試圖借鑒西方和國(guó)內(nèi)有關(guān)構(gòu)建績(jī)效考評(píng)體系的理論和方法,探索建立適合廣州基層邊防檢查站績(jī)效考評(píng)體系。在此基礎(chǔ)上,以廣州出入境邊防檢查總站(下稱廣州邊檢總站)下轄4個(gè)旅檢口岸邊防檢查站為例進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。 通過對(duì)4個(gè)旅檢口岸邊防檢查站2007年第四季度工作績(jī)效考評(píng)的結(jié)果表明:邊檢績(jī)效考評(píng)體系是一項(xiàng)復(fù)雜的系統(tǒng)工程�？荚u(píng)的指標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)要反映了邊檢機(jī)關(guān)的工作方向和目標(biāo),對(duì)基層邊檢站的考評(píng)指標(biāo)及標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)區(qū)分不同崗位的業(yè)務(wù)工作性質(zhì)和崗位人員的類型,按照內(nèi)部通用指標(biāo)和外部專項(xiàng)指標(biāo)相結(jié)合原則,使指標(biāo)內(nèi)容的設(shè)定更客觀、更全面、更好地反映基層邊檢站的實(shí)際工作情況。這種將基層邊檢站的績(jī)效考評(píng)區(qū)分工作性質(zhì)、工作崗位和人員類別的模式,在強(qiáng)化“以人為本”的管理理念同時(shí),有效保證了考評(píng)的客觀性、真實(shí)性和準(zhǔn)確性。進(jìn)一步,本文對(duì)提高廣州邊檢總站績(jī)效管理水平提出了具體對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of socialist market economy and the deepening of China's system reform in the past 30 years of reform and opening up, performance appraisal, as an innovative way of administrative management system and an effective administrative management tool, has been paid more and more attention to. Instead of previous input, bureaucratic procedures and rules become a means of controlling the organization. As an administrative and law-enforcement department of the national civilization window, the border check points for entry and exit should achieve the work goal of "more close, faster and stricter" set by the Ministry of Public Security. It is necessary to establish a comprehensive, scientific and effective performance appraisal system to analyze and evaluate the output of resources in the process of border control. Since the new century, the frontier checkpoints in many places in the country have made active exploration in the aspect of performance evaluation, accumulated experience and achieved results, but there are generally inadequate theoretical preparations, unclear functional positioning, and scientific construction of the index system. Implementation of the process of normative deficiencies and other issues. As a result, the evaluation is often formalistic and difficult to promote performance improvement. In view of this, this paper tries to draw lessons from western and domestic theories and methods of constructing performance evaluation system, and explore the establishment of performance evaluation system suitable for Guangzhou's grass-roots border checkpoints. On this basis, the empirical study is carried out on the four frontier inspection points under the jurisdiction of Guangzhou Frontier Inspection Station (hereinafter referred to as Guangzhou Border Inspection General Station). The results show that the performance evaluation system is a complex system engineering. The design of the evaluation index should reflect the work direction and target of the border inspection office, and the design of the evaluation index and standard of the basic level border inspection station should distinguish the nature of the business work and the type of the post personnel in different posts. According to the principle of the combination of internal general index and external special index, the setting of index content is more objective, more comprehensive and better reflects the actual working situation of the grass-roots frontier inspection station. This model, which distinguishes the performance evaluation of the basic border inspection station from the nature of work, the post and the category of personnel, strengthens the management idea of "people-oriented", and effectively ensures the objectivity, authenticity and accuracy of the evaluation. Furthermore, this paper puts forward concrete countermeasures to improve the performance management level of Guangzhou Frontier Inspection Station.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D631.46

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 謝煒;蔣云根;;我國(guó)公務(wù)員考核制度的發(fā)展路徑——淺析《公務(wù)員法》的新規(guī)定[J];重慶行政;2005年05期

2 鄭方輝;王t2;;地方政府整體績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)中的公眾滿意度研究——以2007年廣東21個(gè)地級(jí)以上市為例[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年01期

3 王暉;陳麗;陳墾;薛漫清;梁慶;;多指標(biāo)綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法及權(quán)重系數(shù)的選擇[J];廣東藥學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

4 周志忍;公共性與行政效率研究[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2000年04期

5 張璋;政府績(jī)效評(píng)估的元設(shè)計(jì)理論:兩種模式及其批判[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2000年06期

6 中國(guó)行政管理學(xué)會(huì)課題組;龔祿根;包國(guó)憲;吳建南;張定安;;政府部門績(jī)效評(píng)估研究報(bào)告[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2006年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張潔;我國(guó)公務(wù)員績(jī)效考評(píng)體系研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2187695