【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪不是刑法規(guī)定的某種具體罪名,而是從刑法理論上對利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)實施的各種詐騙犯罪的總稱。與傳統(tǒng)詐騙犯罪相比,它具有其獨有的特點,即:犯罪空間的虛擬性,犯罪行為的隱蔽性和連續(xù)性,犯罪手段的專業(yè)化,犯罪成本的低廉性,危害對象的廣泛性,以及犯罪主體的低齡化。依據(jù)侵犯的同類客體的不同,網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪可以分為普通網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪和特殊網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪兩大基本類型。普通網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪侵犯客體主要是公私財物所有權(quán)。特殊網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪在侵犯公私財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)的同時,侵犯的主要客體是我國市場經(jīng)濟秩序,一般而言,后者的社會危害性要大于前者。普通網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪主體限于自然人,特殊網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪主體包括自然人和單位。 我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪原因是多方面的。在立法方面,目前我國有關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙的立法比較滯后,現(xiàn)有刑法規(guī)定中直接涉及網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪的僅有兩條。在司法方面,主要問題是案件管轄存在沖突、偵查打擊和國際司法協(xié)助滯后。在安全制度方面,主要是政府監(jiān)管不到位,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)行業(yè)自律不力,有關(guān)安全防范制度和措施不落實。在社會層面,我國正處于社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期,價值觀念混亂,網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德監(jiān)督失控,部分人追逐財富鋌而走險。同時,廣大網(wǎng)民防欺詐意識淡薄,也在一定程度上助長了網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪分子的氣焰。 預(yù)防網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪,需要綜合運用法律、行政、教育等多方面的措施。首先,應(yīng)加大立法力度,解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙法律適用問題。具體建議如下:一是將網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)視為電子數(shù)據(jù),對騙取網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪行為按照《刑法修正案(七)》第9條規(guī)定定罪量刑。二是修改《刑事訴訟法》,明確電子證據(jù)法律地位,并出臺相關(guān)配套法律文件,對電子證據(jù)收集主體、收集原則、審查規(guī)則等作出規(guī)定,以解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪偵查和訴訟中的證據(jù)問題。三是修改刑法有關(guān)法條,將“多次詐騙”作為詐騙罪客觀要件加以規(guī)定,有效打擊多次小額網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙。其次,應(yīng)以屬地管轄為基礎(chǔ),對犯罪地進行合理解釋,形成統(tǒng)一認定標準,避免和減少案件管轄沖突,整合司法資源,嚴格依法執(zhí)法,有效遏制網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪上升勢頭。第三,政府應(yīng)加大網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)管力度,引導、督促網(wǎng)絡(luò)單位落實網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全制度,堵塞漏洞,消除安全隱患,壓縮網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪生存空間。最后,要加強網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德建設(shè),廣泛開展網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全和法制教育,提高全社會特別是廣大網(wǎng)民防欺詐意識和法制觀念,鏟除適宜網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪生存的社會土壤。
[Abstract]:The crime of network fraud is not a specific crime stipulated in criminal law, but a general term for various crime of fraud committed by means of network in theory of criminal law. Compared with the traditional fraud crime, it has its unique characteristics, that is, the fictitious nature of the crime space, the concealment and continuity of the criminal behavior, the specialization of the crime means, the low cost of the crime, and the universality of the harmful object. And the younger age of the criminal subject. According to the same object, the crime of network fraud can be divided into two basic types: ordinary crime of network fraud and special crime of network fraud. The main object of common network fraud crime is public and private property ownership. The main object of the crime of special network fraud is the order of market economy while infringing the ownership of public and private property. Generally speaking, the social harm of the latter is greater than that of the former. The main body of ordinary network fraud crime is limited to natural person, and the special network fraud crime subject includes natural person and unit. There are many reasons for the crime of network fraud in China. In the aspect of legislation, at present, the legislation of network fraud in our country lags behind, and only two articles of the existing criminal law are directly related to the crime of network fraud. In the judicial aspect, the main problem is the conflict of case jurisdiction, the lag of investigation strike and international judicial assistance. In the aspect of safety system, the government supervision is not in place, the self-discipline of network service industry is weak, and the safety prevention system and measures are not carried out. At the social level, our country is in the period of social transformation, the value concept is confused, the network moral supervision is out of control, some people chase after wealth desperate. At the same time, the vast number of Internet users weak awareness of fraud, to a certain extent, also contributed to the arrogance of network fraud criminals. To prevent the crime of network fraud, it is necessary to make comprehensive use of law, administration, education and other measures. First of all, we should strengthen legislation to solve the problem of legal application of network fraud. The specific suggestions are as follows: first, the virtual property of the network is regarded as electronic data, and the crime of obtaining the virtual property of the network is convicted and sentenced according to Article 9 of the Criminal Law Amendment (7). Second, to amend the Criminal procedure Law, to clarify the legal status of electronic evidence, and to issue relevant supporting legal documents to provide for the subject, principles, and rules of examination of electronic evidence collection. In order to solve the problem of evidence in the investigation and litigation of network fraud crime. The third is to amend the relevant articles of the criminal law, to make "multiple fraud" an objective element of the crime of fraud, and to effectively crack down on many small amounts of network fraud. Secondly, on the basis of territorial jurisdiction, we should rationally explain the criminal territory, form a unified standard of cognizance, avoid and reduce the conflict of jurisdiction over cases, integrate judicial resources, strictly enforce the law according to law, and effectively curb the rising trend of the crime of network fraud. Thirdly, the government should strengthen the network supervision, guide and urge the network units to implement the network security system, plug the loopholes, eliminate the hidden dangers of security, and compress the living space of the crime of network fraud. Finally, it is necessary to strengthen the construction of network morality, widely carry out network security and legal education, improve the whole society, especially the vast number of Internet users' awareness of fraud prevention and legal concepts, and eradicate the social soil suitable for the survival of network fraud crime.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D917.6

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 徐金水;網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙犯罪問題研究[D];華中師范大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2177662