發(fā)布時間：2018-06-29 03:05

  本文選題：秘密偵查 + 程序控制�。� 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：文章先通過對秘密偵查的概念、特征和分類等進行介紹，再指出秘密偵查在運行過程中存在的諸如侵犯個人權(quán)利的各種風(fēng)險，然后著重將中美德三國對秘密偵查的控制相比較，試圖尋找出西方國家對秘密偵查控制值得借鑒的經(jīng)驗。在此基礎(chǔ)上，，對我國秘密偵查在法律規(guī)制和實踐中存在的問題及成因進行分析，并對我國秘密偵查的完善提出一些構(gòu)想，以期實現(xiàn)秘密偵查在犯罪控制與人權(quán)保障上的平衡。本文共分四部分，內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分是秘密偵查概述。該部分以對秘密偵查的本質(zhì)進行揭示的方式來界定秘密偵查的概念，再對秘密偵查特征和分類做進一步分析，然后對秘密偵查的法律規(guī)范做一介紹，力圖從整體上對秘密偵查有個全面的認(rèn)識。 第二部分是秘密偵查的風(fēng)險與控制。該部分先對秘密偵查手段的使用存在的主要風(fēng)險進行闡述，認(rèn)為最主要的風(fēng)險是對秘密偵查對象權(quán)利的侵犯以及對倫理道德的沖擊。接著將中美德三國在實體和程序上對秘密偵查控制的幾個主要方面進行比較，從中可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國與美國、德國在秘密偵查控制上的區(qū)別，目的就是希望從比較中發(fā)現(xiàn)我國秘密偵查在規(guī)范與控制上存在的不足。 第三部分是我國秘密偵查存在的問題及成因。該部分分別從法律規(guī)制和司法實踐兩個層面對我國秘密偵查存在的問題進行了闡述，并對存在問題的原因進行了剖析。認(rèn)為我國秘密偵查主要存在程序控制與人權(quán)的保障救濟等方面的不足。認(rèn)為我國秘密偵查現(xiàn)存問題的主要原因是國家對秘密偵查的嚴(yán)密控制、傳統(tǒng)觀念的束縛、中國司法權(quán)力配置的特點以及政治因素的影響等。 第四部分是完善我國秘密偵查的構(gòu)想。該部分首先對秘密偵查法治化應(yīng)遵循的基本原則進行論述，認(rèn)為主要有程序法定原則、比例原則、司法審查原則、權(quán)利救濟原則。其次對我國秘密偵查法治化提出一些具體的構(gòu)想，比如加強監(jiān)督制約、建立違法秘密偵查的制裁機制、建立權(quán)利救濟機制等等，希望我國秘密偵查的運行能夠以最小限度的權(quán)利犧牲來換取最大的犯罪控制效果。
[Abstract]:This paper first introduces the concept, characteristics and classification of secret investigation, then points out the various risks such as infringing individual rights in the course of secret investigation, and then compares the control of secret investigation between China and Germany. Try to find out the western countries to secret investigation control is worth learning experience. On this basis, this paper analyzes the problems and causes of our country's secret investigation in the legal regulation and practice, and puts forward some ideas on the perfection of our country's secret investigation, in order to achieve the balance between crime control and human rights guarantee in secret investigation. This article is divided into four parts, the content is as follows: the first part is an overview of secret investigation. This part defines the concept of secret investigation in the way of revealing the essence of secret investigation, further analyzes the characteristics and classification of secret investigation, and then introduces the legal norms of secret investigation. Try to have a comprehensive understanding of secret investigation on the whole. The second part is the risk and control of secret investigation. In this part, the author expounds the main risks in the use of secret investigative techniques, and thinks that the most important risk is the infringement of the rights of the object of secret investigation and the impact on ethics and morality. Then, by comparing the three countries of China and Germany in substance and procedure to control secret investigation, we can find the difference between China and the United States and Germany in the control of secret investigation. The purpose of this study is to find out the deficiencies in the regulation and control of secret investigation in China. The third part is the problems and causes of secret investigation in China. In this part, the author expounds the problems of secret investigation in China from the aspects of legal regulation and judicial practice, and analyzes the causes of the problems. The author thinks that there are some shortcomings in secret investigation in our country, such as procedural control and human rights guarantee and remedy. It is believed that the main reasons for the existing problems of secret investigation in China are the strict control of secret investigation by the state, the bondage of traditional concepts, the characteristics of the allocation of judicial power in China and the influence of political factors, etc. The fourth part is the idea of perfecting the secret investigation in our country. This part first discusses the basic principles that should be followed in the rule of law of secret investigation, and thinks that there are mainly the principle of procedural law, the principle of proportionality, the principle of judicial review and the principle of right relief. Secondly, it puts forward some concrete ideas on the rule of law of secret investigation in our country, such as strengthening supervision and restriction, establishing sanction mechanism of illegal secret investigation, establishing right relief mechanism, and so on. It is hoped that the operation of secret investigation in our country can exchange the minimum right sacrifice for the maximum crime control effect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D918

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉向紅;對秘密偵查法治化的思考[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報.社會公共安全研究;2001年06期

2 苗青秀;;論秘密偵查制度的立法規(guī)范[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2012年03期

3 謝佑平;鄧立軍;;德國的秘密偵查制度[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年06期

4 王云;;試論我國技術(shù)偵查立法的完善[J];法制與社會;2012年36期

5 蘭躍軍;;比較法視野中的技術(shù)偵查措施[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年05期

6 蔡杰;肖偉;;程序控制與權(quán)利制約語境下的偵查權(quán)控制[J];山西警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2008年01期

7 宋顯忠;;通過法律的權(quán)利保障[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年05期

8 宋顯忠;劉怡;;程序與程序保障[J];吉林公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2006年05期

9 劉衛(wèi)東;;《愛國者法》及其對美國公民權(quán)利的影響[J];美國研究;2006年01期

10 高哲遠;;偵查監(jiān)督視野下技術(shù)偵查研究[J];河南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王文生;國家非公開行使權(quán)力的法治[D];中共中央黨校;2011年

本文編號：2080561