本文選題：大三通 + 社會治安�。� 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：胡錦濤總書記在“十七大”報告中強(qiáng)調(diào),“要牢牢把握兩岸關(guān)系和平發(fā)展的主題,真誠為兩岸同胞謀福祉、為臺海地區(qū)謀和平,維護(hù)國家主權(quán)和領(lǐng)土完整,維護(hù)中華民族根本利益”,并首度提出“在一個中國原則基礎(chǔ)上,協(xié)商正式結(jié)束兩岸敵對狀態(tài),達(dá)成和平協(xié)議”。近年來,隨著海峽兩岸關(guān)系的不斷發(fā)展,經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會、文化、科技、宗教、體育、衛(wèi)生、學(xué)術(shù)等方面的聯(lián)系日益緊密,兩岸經(jīng)貿(mào)交流和人員往來更加頻繁,范圍更加廣泛,形式更加多樣,涉及兩岸的犯罪活動日益猖獗,販毒、走私、詐騙、綁架、敲詐勒索、制售假幣等兩岸間跨境犯罪形式也日益多樣化,并嚴(yán)重危害了兩岸同胞的合法權(quán)益。兩岸司法(警察)機(jī)關(guān)均多次表達(dá)了打擊犯罪的共同意愿,但受限于政治因素,兩岸司法部門缺乏順暢的溝通渠道和配合機(jī)制,影響了兩岸司法機(jī)關(guān)對不法分子的打擊與懲處力度。因此,如何減少影響兩岸治安的不利因素,維護(hù)兩岸同胞生命、財產(chǎn)安全,共同打擊和懲處危害兩岸同胞的犯罪活動,加強(qiáng)兩岸刑事司法協(xié)作及共同治理社會治安,成為當(dāng)前亟待解決的課題。 兩岸應(yīng)加強(qiáng)合作,攜手全面、深入打擊刑事犯罪活動,讓犯罪分子懾于壓力,收斂犯罪觸角,為實現(xiàn)兩岸治安平和穩(wěn)定,推進(jìn)和諧社會建設(shè)和兩岸民眾安居樂業(yè)提供良好的環(huán)境。本文通過對“大三通”前后兩岸出現(xiàn)的一系列的治安新問題進(jìn)行現(xiàn)狀剖析及原因分析,從建立和完善相關(guān)制度,共同打擊跨區(qū)域犯罪；開展兩岸刑事司法協(xié)作商談,加強(qiáng)兩岸打擊刑事犯罪司法協(xié)作；建立試點先行先試,探索兩岸共同打擊犯罪的途徑；逐步完善司法制度,構(gòu)建“兩岸警務(wù)一體化”合作框架等方面提出相應(yīng)對策。
[Abstract]:General Secretary Hu Jintao stressed in the report of the 17th National Congress that "it is necessary to firmly grasp the theme of the peaceful development of cross-strait relations, sincerely strive for the well-being of compatriots on both sides of the strait, seek peace for the Taiwan Strait region, and safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity." "safeguard the fundamental interests of the Chinese nation," and put forward for the first time, "on the basis of the one-China principle, formally end cross-strait hostilities through consultation and reach a peace agreement." In recent years, with the continuous development of cross-strait relations, economic, social, cultural, scientific, technological, religious, sports, health, academic and other aspects of the relationship, cross-strait economic and trade exchanges and personnel exchanges have become more frequent and extensive. The forms of cross-border crimes such as drug trafficking, smuggling, fraud, kidnapping, extortion, making and selling counterfeit currency, and other forms of cross-border crimes between the two sides of the strait are becoming more and more diversified, and have seriously endangered the legitimate rights and interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait. The judicial (police) organs on both sides of the strait have repeatedly expressed their common will to combat crime, but limited by political factors, the judicial authorities on both sides of the strait lack a smooth communication channel and cooperation mechanism. Affected the two sides of the judicial organs to break the law and the degree of punishment. Therefore, how to reduce the adverse factors affecting cross-strait public order, safeguard the lives and property security of compatriots on both sides of the strait, jointly crack down on and punish criminal activities that endanger compatriots on both sides of the strait, strengthen criminal judicial cooperation between the two sides and jointly administer public order, It has become an urgent task to be solved. The two sides of the strait should strengthen cooperation, work hand in hand and thoroughly crack down on criminal activities, so that criminals can be deterred from pressure and converge on their criminal tentacles in order to achieve peace and stability on both sides of the strait. Promoting the construction of a harmonious society and providing a good environment for people on both sides of the strait to live and work in peace and contentment. Through the analysis of the current situation and the causes of a series of new public security problems on both sides of the strait before and after the "three links", this article aims at establishing and perfecting relevant systems to jointly crack down on cross-regional crimes, and carrying out cross-strait criminal judicial cooperation talks. Strengthening the judicial cooperation between the two sides of the strait in cracking down on criminal crimes; setting up a pilot trial first to explore the ways for the two sides to jointly crack down on crime; perfecting the judicial system step by step; constructing the cooperation framework of "the integration of the two sides of the strait of police affairs" and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D631.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳沛林;;論香港打擊黑社會有組織犯罪的立法與實踐[J];北方法學(xué);2008年02期

2 劉為軍;歐盟警務(wù)一體化的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢[J];福建公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2005年02期

3 吳仲柱;;兩岸警務(wù)協(xié)作實踐與深化路徑[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期

4 王偉;;假幣犯罪研究[J];公安研究;2009年08期

5 易志華;馬進(jìn)保;;“一國兩制”框架下的區(qū)際司法協(xié)助[J];廣州社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年04期

6 蘇寧;;兩岸“大三通”全景回放[J];兩岸關(guān)系;2009年02期

7 曹建明;;聯(lián)手打擊跨國有組織犯罪 共同維護(hù)區(qū)域安全與穩(wěn)定[J];人民檢察;2009年08期

8 楊凱;當(dāng)代中國區(qū)際刑事管轄沖突解決原則檢討[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

9 程榮斌;我國海峽兩岸交往中的刑事訴訟問題[J];政法論壇;1991年03期

10 趙秉志,黃芳;區(qū)際刑事司法協(xié)助法律研討會綜述[J];中國刑事法雜志;2002年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 許皆清;臺灣地區(qū)有組織犯罪與對策研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙巍;閩臺通婚問題研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1805673