本文選題：民事　切入點：司法鑒定　出處：《西南政法大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 本文首先分析了在民事訴訟中司法鑒定的啟動程序中有關英美法系國家與大陸法系國家的異同以及兩者的利弊后,分析評價我國司法鑒定啟動程序并提出我國司法鑒定啟動程序的構建模式:在民事案件中,只要當事人提出鑒定申請不是故意拖延時間且是查明案件事實所必須的情況下,法院應當允許當事人鑒定的請求,賦予當事人司法鑒定的啟動權,但同時法院應該適當?shù)囊?guī)制當事人的鑒定權,以防止鑒定權的濫用,導致可能發(fā)生的司法資源浪費,并建立相應的救濟程序;其次、分析我國現(xiàn)行法律體系中有關司法鑒定的實施程序、質證程序、認證程序等內容,指出目前有關民事訴訟司法鑒定的程序規(guī)定的具體內容、存在的問題,詳細闡述司法鑒定程序中有關實施程序的司法鑒定的主體、司法鑒定材料的篩選提供、鑒定材料的保全、司法鑒定的實施;重點分析論證司法鑒定結論質證的必要性、程序要求、質證的方式及內容,通過中外有關鑒定人出庭作證、專家輔助人制度的分析比較,倡導在司法鑒定意見書質證程序中貫徹堅持鑒定人出庭作證原則的基礎之上,建立健全我國專家輔助人制度,以此提高訴訟當事人對鑒定意見書的質證質量;通過對司法鑒定意見書合法性、客觀性、關聯(lián)性的審查,并綜合案件其它證據,特別是經過法庭質證已經查證屬實的證據材料,正確認定司法鑒定意見書的證據效力;這部分內容還參照某些地方審判機關針對司法鑒定程序方面所作出了有利的探索經驗,提出我國民事司法鑒定在上述程序制度設置的建議;最后、在分析重復鑒定所產生的原因、危害及重新鑒定的主要情形后,根據現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定歸納總結重新鑒定的主體及有關申請重新鑒定的期限,并針對有關司法實踐中的問題提出相應處理意見;此后結合司法實踐,用比較詳盡的資料和翔實案件分析,詳細分析論證在民事訴訟中應當依照《最高人民法院關于民事訴訟證據的若干規(guī)定》第二十七條、第二十八條之規(guī)定,嚴格審查把握重新鑒定的標準,要建立健全嚴格的重新鑒定審查制度,設立補充鑒定制度,避免重復鑒定,樹立司法權威,真正讓司法鑒定成為幫助法官確定案件事實的重要手段。
[Abstract]:This paper first analyzes the civil lawsuit in judicial identification startup in the countries of Anglo American law system and continental law countries and the similarities and differences of both advantages and disadvantages, analysis and evaluation of judicial appraisal in our country and put forward the construction mode to start the program starting procedure of judicial appraisal in our country: in civil cases, as long as the parties make appraisal application not delay time is the case must be identified and the facts of the case, the court shall allow the parties to identify the request, give the parties the right to initiate judicial expertise, but at the same time, the court should identify the appropriate right regulation of the parties, to prevent the abuse of the right identification, resulting in a waste of judicial resources may occur, and establish the corresponding relief procedure; secondly, analysis of the implementation procedures for judicial authentication in China's current legal system, quality certification procedures, certification procedures and other content, pointed out that the current relevant civil litigation Division The specific content of identification procedures, existing problems, elaborates the subject of judicial identification on the implementation procedure of the judicial identification procedures in the screening of forensic materials, identification of material preservation, implementation of judicial authentication; judicial expertise. Focus on the analysis of necessity, the quality examination of the program requirements, and content quality permits, by Chinese and foreign relevant expert testimony, a comparative analysis of the expert assistant system, carry out advocacy adhere to the expert testimony on the principle of judicial authentication opinions on cross examination procedures, establishing and perfecting the expert assistant system, in order to improve the litigants for the identification of opinion testimony by quality; on the judicial authentication opinions legitimacy, objectivity, relevance and comprehensive review, the case of other evidence, especially after the court testimony has been verified according to the material, is confirmed The effectiveness of certain forensic opinion evidence; this part also refer to some local judicial organs according to the procedure of judicial appraisal has made beneficial exploration experience, put forward our country civil judicial appraisal system is suggested in the program; finally, in the analysis of the reasons caused by repeated identification and re identification, the main harm after according to the existing laws and regulations, the main summary of re identification and the related application re appraisal period, and put forward the corresponding opinion on the relevant problems in the judicial practice; then combined with judicial practice, with detailed data and detailed case analysis, detailed analysis and demonstration should be in accordance with the "Supreme People's Court on evidence in civil proceedings a number of provisions twenty-seventh in civil litigation, the provisions of article twenty-eighth, strictly examine the grasp re identification standards, to establish and improve the strict We should re identify the review system, set up a supplementary identification system, avoid duplication of appraisal, establish judicial authority, and truly make forensic expertise an important means to help judges determine the facts of a case.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D918.9

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 朱福高;人身損害賠償訴訟中司法鑒定調查分析[D];蘭州大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1597831