本文關(guān)鍵詞： 多元主體 群體性事件 矛盾化解 對策研究　出處：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：當前我國正處于“經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)軌”和“社會轉(zhuǎn)型”的關(guān)鍵時期，無論是社會、政治、還是經(jīng)濟、文化，乃至人民群眾的生活等各個方面都發(fā)生了日新月異的變化。但是，隨之也帶來了許許多多、大大小小、錯綜復雜的社會矛盾，，特別是由征土拆遷、勞資糾紛、事企改革、福利待遇、環(huán)境污染等利益沖突引發(fā)的群體性事件數(shù)量逐年上升，近年來更是呈爆發(fā)式增長趨勢。2006年至2009年，我國每年爆發(fā)的群體性事件幾乎都在6萬起以上，其中更是不乏貴州甕安事件、云南孟連事件、湖北石首事件等在全國范圍之內(nèi)都極具影響的群體性事件。江蘇省作為全國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的領(lǐng)跑者，隨著經(jīng)濟的飛速發(fā)展，社會矛盾日益凸顯，近年來也發(fā)生了無錫黃土塘垃圾焚燒廠事件、蘇州通安征土拆遷事件等，而2013年8月的南通王子事件更是引發(fā)群眾沖擊市政府，造成了極為惡劣的影響。受到國際金融危機、經(jīng)濟發(fā)展受限、失業(yè)率激增等影響，國內(nèi)利益沖突型群體性事件將長期存在并面臨高發(fā)風險，因此，群體性事件的不斷發(fā)生，已經(jīng)無疑成為了阻礙我國和諧社會推進發(fā)展的重要因素之一。黨的十七大曾指出，要健全“黨委領(lǐng)導、政府問責、社會協(xié)同、公眾參與”的社會管理格局，這意味著當前正處于轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國，上至中央、下至基層政府的社會治理，都應(yīng)該是在黨和政府的領(lǐng)導和統(tǒng)籌下，各種部門主體、社會群體共同參與的公共治理。同時，在不斷完善公共治理的基礎(chǔ)上，堅持不懈地促進基層社會的公民治理和地方政府的官民合作治理。為此，在這一背景下用社會主體參與的多元化治理框架來探討我國群體性事件的化解模式，對于深入構(gòu)建和諧社會、堅持推進改革開放發(fā)展大局、正確處理人民內(nèi)部矛盾等都有著非常重要的實際意義。 本文首先對利益沖突型群體性事件的概念、特征、發(fā)生的原因以及治理理論的發(fā)展進行闡述，接著從政府、公民、社會團體等維度深入分析了我國群體性事件防治存在的問題，最后結(jié)合國外政府治理的一些經(jīng)驗以及當前我國社會形勢，對多元化參與利益沖突型群體性事件防治的對策進行了探討，提出了一些的策略和措施，以期能夠為我們國家在預防和處理群體性事件方面有所幫助！
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the critical period of "economic transition" and "social transformation", whether it is social, political, economic, cultural. Even the people's life and other aspects have changed with each passing day. However, it has also brought many, large and small, complex social contradictions, especially by the demolition of land, labor disputes. The number of group incidents caused by conflicts of interest, such as enterprise reform, welfare treatment, environmental pollution and so on, has been increasing year by year, especially in recent years. 2006 to 2009. There are almost 60,000 incidents that erupt in China every year, including Weng'an incident in Guizhou province and Menglian incident in Yunnan province. As the leader of the national economic development, with the rapid development of the economy, social contradictions have become increasingly prominent in Jiangsu Province. In recent years, Wuxi Huangtutang waste incineration plant incident, Suzhou Tong Anzheng soil demolition incident, and in August 2013, the Prince Nantong incident even triggered a mass impact on the municipal government. Due to the impact of the international financial crisis, limited economic development, soaring unemployment and so on, the domestic conflicts of interest group events will exist for a long time and face a high risk. The continuous occurrence of mass incidents has undoubtedly become one of the important factors hindering the development of a harmonious society in our country. The 17th National Congress of the CPC pointed out that "Party committee leadership, government accountability, and social coordination should be perfected." The social management pattern of public participation means that the social governance of China in the transition period, from the central government to the grass-roots government, should be the main body of various departments under the leadership and coordination of the Party and the government. At the same time, on the basis of the continuous improvement of public governance, we should unremittingly promote the civil governance of grass-roots society and the cooperative governance of local governments. Under this background, using the pluralistic governance framework of the participation of social subjects to explore the solution mode of mass events in China, for the in-depth construction of a harmonious society, adhere to promote the overall situation of reform and opening up and development. It is of great practical significance to correctly handle contradictions among the people. In this paper, the concept, characteristics, causes and the development of governance theory of conflict of interest group events are first described, and then from the government, citizens. Social groups and other dimensions of in-depth analysis of the problems of prevention and control of mass incidents in China, finally combined with some foreign government governance experience and the current social situation in China. This paper probes into the countermeasures of pluralistic participation in the prevention and treatment of group incidents of conflict of interest, and puts forward some strategies and measures in order to help our country to prevent and deal with group incidents.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D631.43

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊瑞清;余達宏;;論群體性事件的發(fā)生原因及其治理對策[J];江西社會科學;2005年10期

2 李金;;妥善處置群體性事件 維護社會穩(wěn)定[J];吉林省社會主義學院學報;2005年04期

3 楊瑞清;辜靜波;;關(guān)于弱勢群體引發(fā)群體性事件的原因透析[J];求實;2005年12期

4 王玉龍;呂云濤;;健全能量釋放機制,加強突發(fā)群體性事件的預防控制[J];臺聲.新視角;2005年06期

5 李新鈺;蔣連舟;趙超;;試論農(nóng)村群體性事件的原因與防范[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2005年06期

6 ;農(nóng)村群體性事件應(yīng)急處置四大機制[J];領(lǐng)導決策信息;2005年39期

7 麻彥偉;;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府處理群體性事件的原則[J];領(lǐng)導科學;2005年23期

8 余凌云;唐熒;;論群體性事件的預警機制[J];中國公共安全(學術(shù)版);2005年02期

9 李萬和;有效預防和妥善處置群體性事件[J];公安研究;2005年02期

10 陽紅光;淺談群體性事件的處置[J];公安研究;2005年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 畢雁英;;群體性事件的性質(zhì)及其根源分析[A];中國法學會行政法學研究會2010年會論文集[C];2010年

2 董v

本文編號：1470810