本文系作者根據(jù)其辦理國(guó)際商事案的筆記整理撰寫(xiě),主要涉及《銷售公約》的適用、公約與內(nèi)國(guó)法的互動(dòng)、國(guó)際法優(yōu)先、原《涉外經(jīng)濟(jì)合同法》第6條規(guī)定的缺陷及其對(duì)中國(guó)仲裁員的但他們卻往往沒(méi)有意識(shí)到的負(fù)面影響;作者還希圖讓同行注意澳大利亞學(xué)者M(jìn)arcus S Jacobs在其專門為中國(guó)同行撰寫(xiě)的文章中對(duì)《銷售公約》適用的見(jiàn)解。 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：37 頁(yè)

【文章目錄】：
I. Case One: An Australian Company v A Chinese Company
    A. The parties and some provisions and clauses contained in the General Distributorship Agreement
    B. Quotations from the Statement of Claim by the solicitors of the Buyer and their exposition on the application of the CISG
        Particulars
        Particulars
    C. Brief comments on the Statement of Claims
        Sale by description
        Implied conditions as to quality or fitness
    D. An unreasonable and unexpected event
II.Case Two: A Chinese Company v A Singapore Pte. Ltd Under the Jurisdiction of the CIETAC,South China Numbered SHEN 2008114
    A.Briefs of the case
    B. The application of the P.R. China law and of the CISG as well
III. Case Three:A Hong Kong Corporation v A Vietnam Corporation Under the Jurisdiction of the CIETAC, South China Numbered as SHEN R2009030
    A. The overview of the case
    B. The understanding and interpretation of the application of the CISG of the lawyers of the parties
    C. The correct principles of application of civil law in connection with foreign elements in China
IV. Case Four: An Australian Corporation v A Chinese Corporation under the Jurisdiction of CIETAC, South China Numbered SHEN M2008201
    A. Briefs of the case that closely related to this commentary
    B.The Tribunal's Divergent Opinions between the Majority and the Minority on the Applicable Law
    C. Advice on the application of the CISG given by one professional within CIETAC, South China
    D. The official view of the majority contained in the Final Award ——quotations from the Arbitral Award(21)
    D. NPL v MBM
        1.About material breach of contract
        2. About the application of the CISG
        3.The silence of the Parties on the application of the CISG does not mean that they have reached an agreement to exclude the application of the Convention
        4.Some precedent or similar case of the application of the CISG at CIETAC, South China
        5.Viewpoints of specialists, scholars and professionals in respect of the application of the CISG
        6. Concluding Remarks
        7. Additional remarks about some respect of the viewpoint held by the majority on the application of law
V.Supplement
    A. Some qualifications for an arbitrator
    B. The old conception contained in Art 6 of the Repealed Foreign Economic Contract Law
    C. Arbitrators on the panel of CIETAC should be somewhat familiar with its precedent



本文編號(hào)：3687391