發(fā)布時間：2021-03-20 08:53

　　本文通過對律師詢問中預設進行分類分析和對其功能的闡釋來研究預設的使用范疇和特點,旨在從中探究律師是怎樣通過預設這一策略來獲取有利信息的。根據(jù)尤爾對預設的分類,作者在英漢的庭審材料中分析了這六種預設:存在性預設,語詞性預設,結構性預設,事實性預設,非事實性預設,和反事實性預設。律師在詢問過程中使用這六種預設主要用于兩種策略:預設陷阱策略和信息組織策略。他們的具體分別功能是:麻痹回話者給出有利答案或者導話題和信息流并使其向預期方向發(fā)展。作為補充,本文還對不同的預設在不同功能中出現(xiàn)的頻率進行了統(tǒng)計。我們希望,本文對律師詢問中預設使用的探討,有助于了解律師詢問的特征,并且能有助于律師通過詢問更有效地獲取有利信息,同時也能夠幫助回話者避免預設陷阱,不被律師所控制,提高司法的公正性。 

【文章來源】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學廣東省

【文章頁數(shù)】：88 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Contents
Chapter Ⅰ Introduction
    1.1 Research topic
    1.2 Background of this thesis
    1.3 Definition of favorable information
    1.4 Rationale
    1.5 Research questions
    1.6 Data and methodology
        1.6.1 Data collection
        1.6.2 Methodology
    1.7 Organization of the thesis
Chapter Ⅱ Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Overall review of presupposition theory
        2.2.1 The concept of presupposition
        2.2.2 Two approaches of presupposition
    2.3 Classification of presupposition
        2.3.1 Existential presupposition
        2.3.2 Factive presupposition
        2.3.3 Lexical Presupposition
        2.3.4 Structural Presupposition
        2.3.5 Non-factive presupposition
        2.3.6 Counter-factual presupposition
    2.4 Study on lawyers' presupposition in lawyer's inquiry
    2.5 Information structure
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Ⅲ Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Classification of presuppositions
    3.3 Features of presupposition
        3.3.1 Constancy under negation
        3.3.2 Being latent
        3.3.3 Mutual knowledge
    3.4 The dynamics of presupposition
    3.5 Study on Lawyer's goals
    3.6 Analytical framework
    3.7 Summary
Chapter Ⅳ Presupposition as a strategy for setting up traps
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Adoption of presupposition as traps
        4.2.1 Use of Existential Presupposition
        4.2.2 Use of Factive Presupposition
        4.2.3 Use of Lexical Presupposition
        4.2.4 Structural Presupposition
        4.2.5 Non-factive Presupposition
        4.2.6 Counter-factual Presupposition
    4.3 Summary
Chapter Ⅴ Presupposition as a strategy for information organization
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Lawyer's goal and information flow
    5.3 Topic initiation by presupposition
    5.4 Leading and controlling information flow by presupposition
    5.5 Observation of presuppositions in each lawyers' inquiry
        5.5.1 Observation of presupposition in topic initiation
        5.5.2 Observation of presupposition in information progression
    5.6 Summary
Chapter Ⅵ Concluding Remarks
    6.1 Summary of the present study
    6.2 Major Findings
    6.3 Conclusions
    6.4 Implications
    6.5 Limitations of the present study
    6.6 Suggestions for further study
References
Acknowledgements
Appendix


【參考文獻】：
期刊論文
[1]律師語言策略在庭審中所傳遞的意向含意[J]. 張丹,邱天河.  鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學院學報(社會科學版). 2007(03)
[2]法庭會話中的語言預設策略分析[J]. 張玥.  廣東外語外貿(mào)大學學報. 2007(02)
[3]法庭言語行為與言語策略[J]. 趙軍峰.  廣東外語外貿(mào)大學學報. 2007(02)
[4]法律語篇樹狀信息結構研究[J]. 杜金榜.  現(xiàn)代外語. 2007(01)
[5]語用預設及其交際功能[J]. 鄭國平.  安徽水利水電職業(yè)技術學院學報. 2006(03)
[6]如何避免語用預設失誤[J]. 羅國瑩.  修辭學習. 2006(05)
[7]庭審會話中的言語策略和權力控制——律師-證人庭審會話分析[J]. 李濱,楊躍.  榆林學院學報. 2006(01)
[8]語用預設的語篇功能體現(xiàn)[J]. 倪海燕,唐德根.  求索. 2005(11)
[9]試論預設策略在法庭交叉詢問中的運用[J]. 藍小燕.  涪陵師范學院學報. 2005(05)
[10]目的原則與語篇連貫分析[J]. 廖美珍.  外語教學與研究. 2005(05)

碩士論文
[1]從預設角度看警察訊問信息傳遞中問題類型和句子結構的選擇[D]. 張文帥.廣東外語外貿(mào)大學 2005



本文編號：3090726