【摘要】：目的運(yùn)用王氏崩漏1號(hào)方對(duì)血瘀型崩漏患者進(jìn)行治療,通過臨床的實(shí)際應(yīng)用觀察其在崩漏出血期的止血效果及對(duì)中醫(yī)證候的改善情況,為臨床應(yīng)用提供理論支持和科學(xué)依據(jù)。方法將符合診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的120例血瘀型崩漏患者,采用隨機(jī)單盲法分為治療組60例(給予王氏崩漏1號(hào)方治療),對(duì)照組60例(給予逐瘀止血湯治療)。2組均采取在出血期用藥的方法,3天為一個(gè)治療周期,治療3個(gè)周期,觀察兩組患者止血療效,治療前后臨床中醫(yī)證候的改善,總體療效,子宮內(nèi)膜厚度的變化,記錄相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)并進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。兩組通過自身治療前后的對(duì)照及組間比較綜合評(píng)定臨床療效。結(jié)果1.兩組患者的一般資料及治療前基線病情方面,兩組組間比較(P0.05),具有可比性。2.止血療效方面治療組有效率為93.3%,對(duì)照組有效率為81.67%,王氏崩漏1號(hào)方止血效果優(yōu)于對(duì)照組(P0.05)。3.中醫(yī)臨床證候改善方面兩組患者治療后中醫(yī)證候均有改善(P0.01);王氏崩漏1號(hào)方對(duì)崩漏患者中醫(yī)證候的改善更顯著,明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組(P0.05)。4.子宮內(nèi)膜厚度兩組患者治療后均可降低子宮內(nèi)膜厚度(P0.01),但治療組明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組(P0.05)。5.總體療效評(píng)價(jià)方面治療組治療后有效率為96.67%,對(duì)照組治療后總有效率81.67%,治療組總體療效明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組(P0.05)。6.兩組患者在治療期間均未出現(xiàn)任何不良反應(yīng)。結(jié)論王氏崩漏1號(hào)方治療血瘀型崩漏安全有效,止血效果、臨床總體效果顯著,且明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組,能有效改善臨床中醫(yī)證候,降低子宮內(nèi)膜的厚度,值得臨床運(yùn)用和推廣。
[Abstract]:Methods 120 patients with blood stasis type insipidus were included in the diagnostic criteria and excluded from the criteria. The hemostatic effect, the improvement of TCM syndrome, the total curative effect and the change of endometrial thickness before and after treatment were observed, and the relevant data were recorded and analyzed statistically. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by comparison and comparison between the two groups before and after self-treatment. Result 1. The general data of the two groups and baseline condition before treatment, the comparison between the two groups (P0.05), comparable. 2. The effective rate of hemostatic effect was 93.3in treatment group and 81.67m in control group. The hemostatic effect of Wang's inside-out No. 1 prescription was better than that of control group (P0.05) .3. Endometrial thickness in both groups after treatment can reduce endometrial thickness (P0.01), but the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (P0.05). 5. The total effective rate of the treatment group was 96.67 and the total effective rate of the control group was 81.67. The overall efficacy of the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group (P0.05). There were no adverse reactions during treatment in both groups.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西中醫(yī)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：R271.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王國(guó)建;;功能失調(diào)性子宮出血發(fā)病機(jī)制和治療進(jìn)展[J];世界最新醫(yī)學(xué)信息文摘;2015年36期

2 袁秀芳;;固沖湯加減治療崩漏55例[J];西部中醫(yī)藥;2015年08期

3 孫鳳嬌;李振麟;錢士輝;濮社班;;干姜化學(xué)成分和藥理作用研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)野生植物資源;2015年03期

4 劉正君;吉延慧;張琪嘉鈺;郭琦;張恩戶;;三七止血作用的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];陜西中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

5 鐘曉鳳;;三七的藥理作用及其臨床應(yīng)用研究[J];中醫(yī)臨床研究;2015年06期

6 陳桂清;李成志;;功能失調(diào)性子宮出血的發(fā)病機(jī)制及治療進(jìn)展[J];醫(yī)學(xué)綜述;2015年03期

7 劉海曄;;淺議益母草活血與破血之說[J];山西中醫(yī);2014年11期

8 鄧中堂;;中藥五靈脂的研究進(jìn)展[J];臨床醫(yī)藥文獻(xiàn)電子雜志;2014年09期

9 岑妍慧;趙飛蘭;范蓉;何國(guó)珍;;生殖相關(guān)腎虛證和補(bǔ)腎中藥作用機(jī)制的研究進(jìn)展[J];醫(yī)學(xué)綜述;2014年12期

10 王浩;于增瑞;;于增瑞教授“三期五法”治療崩漏經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];天津中醫(yī)藥;2014年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2125999