本文選題：神經(jīng)根型頸椎病 + 藥艾條　； 參考：《中醫(yī)雜志》2017年12期

【摘要】：目的觀察不同組成藥艾條對(duì)400例神經(jīng)根型頸椎病患者的臨床療效。方法將400例風(fēng)寒濕證神經(jīng)根型頸椎病患者隨機(jī)分為治療組(藥艾條,正常比例)、清艾組(僅用艾絨)、對(duì)照組1~6(分別使用藥艾條按不同比例制備的擬藥艾條)各50例,進(jìn)行溫和灸治療,各組均每?jī)扇瞻?次,共90天。觀察各組臨床療效以及臨床神經(jīng)病理性疼痛量表(NPQ)百分比和視覺模擬評(píng)分法(VAS)評(píng)分改善情況。結(jié)果治療組、清艾組、對(duì)照組1、對(duì)照組2、對(duì)照組3、對(duì)照組4、對(duì)照組5、對(duì)照組6臨床療效總有效率分別為98.0%、84.0%、78.0%、70.0%、62.0%、88.0%、84.0%及82.0%,治療組總有效率明顯高于清艾組及對(duì)照組1~6(P0.05或P0.01),清艾組及對(duì)照組4、5、6總有效率明顯高于對(duì)照組3(P0.05或P0.01)。各組患者治療后NPQ百分比及VAS評(píng)分均明顯下降(P0.05或P0.01);治療后治療組NPQ百分比及VAS評(píng)分均明顯低于清艾組及對(duì)照組1~6(P0.01);治療后清艾組及對(duì)照組1、4、5、6 NPQ百分比及VAS評(píng)分明顯低于對(duì)照組3(P0.05或P0.01)。結(jié)論藥艾條對(duì)風(fēng)寒濕引起的神經(jīng)根型頸椎病臨床療效較好,以艾絨聯(lián)合三種中藥效果最佳。
[Abstract]:Objective to observe the clinical effect of different components of Aplendron on 400 patients with cervical spondylopathy of nerve root type. Methods 400 cases of cervical spondylopathy of nerve root type with wind-cold and dampness syndrome were randomly divided into treatment group (normal proportion), Qingai group (using only Ailong) and control group (50 cases each). All groups were treated with mild moxibustion once every two days for 90 days. The clinical efficacy, the percentage of clinical neuropathic pain scale (NPQ) and the improvement of visual analogue score (VAS) were observed. Control group 1, control group 2, control group 3, control group 4, control group 5. The total effective rates of clinical efficacy in the control group were 98.00.84.0% and 78.0% respectively. The total effective rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the Qingai group and the control group (P0.05 or P0.01). The total effective rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the Qingai group and the control group (P0.05 or P0.01), and the total effective rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the Qingai group and the control group (P0.05 or P0.01). The rate was significantly higher than that of the control group (P0.05 or P0.01). After treatment, the percentage of NPQ and VAS scores in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the Qingai group and the control group (P0.01), and the percentage of NPQ and VAS score in the treatment group and control group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P0.01), and the percentage of NPQ and VAS score in the treatment group and control group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P0.01). It was significantly lower than that of the control group (P0.05 or P0.01). Conclusion the clinical effect of Aplendron on nerve root type cervical spondylosis caused by wind cold and dampness is better than that of Ailong combined with three kinds of traditional Chinese medicine.
【作者單位】： 上海中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)附屬岳陽(yáng)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)院;上海市針灸經(jīng)絡(luò)研究所;
【基金】：上海中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)研究生教育創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(JX61.02.03.27)
【分類號(hào)】：R246.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐福安;暑兼寒濕證診治簡(jiǎn)介[J];新中醫(yī);1985年07期

2 夏洪生;;傷寒濕證初探[J];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥;1984年01期

3 張震;;疑似證之鑒別與治療 (續(xù)三)[J];云南中醫(yī)雜志;1980年04期

4 楊挺;王培民;諸方受;;膝寧方治療腎陽(yáng)虛寒濕證膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎患者的康復(fù)評(píng)定[J];遼寧中醫(yī)雜志;2007年03期

5 曾立清;;活絡(luò)止痛湯治療腰椎間盤突出癥(寒濕證)200例臨床觀察[J];中醫(yī)臨床研究;2014年05期

6 王智勇;宋永偉;李志強(qiáng);李無陰;;綜合療法治療神經(jīng)根型頸椎病風(fēng)寒濕證115例臨床觀察[J];中醫(yī)雜志;2013年04期

7 夔明;溫化寒濕法治療膽囊炎二例[J];江蘇中醫(yī)雜志;1984年05期

8 王天瑤;診治急性腹瀉612例報(bào)告[J];交通醫(yī)學(xué);2003年02期

9 張波,王彭齡,張雪艷;水濕為病寒熱辨證的臨床體會(huì)[J];河南中醫(yī)藥學(xué)刊;2000年05期

10 涂一世;靜文;;溫運(yùn)湯保留灌腸治療小兒輪狀病毒性腸炎療效觀察[J];中國(guó)中醫(yī)藥信息雜志;2013年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 劉澤恩;杵針結(jié)合中藥熏洗治療腰腿痛（寒濕證）的臨床療效觀察[D];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

2 于海艷;烏（附）夏伍用治療風(fēng)濕病寒濕證的文獻(xiàn)研究[D];長(zhǎng)春中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2010年

3 蔡桂玲;散寒消u曁樂瘟埔疾⊙俺Ｐ停êぃ┑牧俅慚芯縖D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2006年

4 毛慧君;中醫(yī)外感風(fēng)寒、寒濕證病因因素量化和多維相關(guān)研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2007年

5 胡厚琴;111例胃鏡檢查結(jié)果和太陰病聯(lián)系的探討[D];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2006年

6 王智勇;三種綜合療法治療神經(jīng)根型頸椎�。L(fēng)寒濕證）的比較研究[D];湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2112232