《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》與《阿育吠陀》養(yǎng)生觀的對(duì)照研究
本文選題:黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng) + 阿育吠陀。 參考:《廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:目的:《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》與《阿育吠陀》是奠定中醫(yī)和印度傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)阿育吠陀醫(yī)學(xué)的重要著作!饵S帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》與《阿育吠陀》里記載著許多養(yǎng)生方法和指導(dǎo)養(yǎng)生方法的養(yǎng)生觀。通過《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》和《阿育吠陀》養(yǎng)生觀和方法的對(duì)照研究,能夠更好的理解中醫(yī)和阿育吠陀的養(yǎng)生觀,并能夠達(dá)到取長補(bǔ)短。方法:通過文獻(xiàn)研究,收集《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》和《阿育吠陀》對(duì)生命的認(rèn)識(shí),養(yǎng)生指導(dǎo)原則和養(yǎng)生方法,并對(duì)兩部經(jīng)典中的養(yǎng)生觀和方法進(jìn)行比較。結(jié)果:《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》和《阿育吠陀》對(duì)養(yǎng)生的認(rèn)識(shí)奠定了各自養(yǎng)生觀的理論基礎(chǔ)。兩部經(jīng)典的養(yǎng)生觀有許多相同之處,如對(duì)生命的起源、整體觀、平衡觀、五行與五大元素等,但對(duì)于體質(zhì)、生命要素的論述則有些不同的觀點(diǎn)。在具體養(yǎng)生方法方面,《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》與《阿育吠陀》在四季養(yǎng)生、飲食養(yǎng)生、情志養(yǎng)生中皆有著許多相同的方法。結(jié)論:由于在兩部經(jīng)典成書時(shí),科技尚未發(fā)達(dá),人們?yōu)榱松娑纪ㄟ^對(duì)自然界變化以及自然界對(duì)人的影響的觀察得出的智慧!秲(nèi)經(jīng)》與《阿育吠陀》的養(yǎng)生指導(dǎo)原則和對(duì)生命的認(rèn)識(shí)受到了哲學(xué)和自然科學(xué)的影響,而中印的古代哲學(xué)和自然科學(xué)有著許多相同之處。這即是導(dǎo)致《內(nèi)經(jīng)》與《阿育吠陀》養(yǎng)生觀相同的原因。然而,由于宗教文化上的差異和地域環(huán)境的差異,導(dǎo)致了兩部經(jīng)典中養(yǎng)生觀的不同之處。
[Abstract]:Objective: Huangdi Neijing and Ayurveda are important works of traditional Chinese medicine and traditional Indian medicine. Through the comparative study of the views and methods of health preservation in Huangdi Classic and Ayurveda, we can better understand Chinese medicine and Ayurveda's view of health preservation, and can make up for each other. Methods: through literature study, the author collected the understanding of life, the guiding principles and methods of health preservation in Huangdi Classic and Ayurveda, and compared the views and methods of health preservation in the two scriptures. Results: Huangdi Neijing and Ayurveda laid the theoretical foundation of their respective views on health preservation. There are many similarities between the two classical views on health preservation, such as the origin of life, the whole view, the balance view, the five elements and the five elements, etc. In terms of specific methods of health preservation, Huangdi Neijing and Ayurveda have many same methods in the four seasons, diet, and emotional health. Conclusion: at the time of the two classic books, science and technology were not developed, The wisdom of man in order to survive by observing the changes in nature and the influence of nature on man. The guiding principles of health and understanding of life of the Neijing and Ayurveda are influenced by philosophy and natural science. Chinese and Indian ancient philosophy and natural science have a lot in common. This is why the Neijing is the same as the Ayurvedic view of health. However, the differences of religious culture and regional environment lead to the differences of the two classics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:R212
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 Young Min Kang;Richard Komakech;Chandrakant Shivappa Karigar;Asma Saqib;;印度與韓國傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)比較[J];亞太傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)藥;2017年08期
2 董曉艷;;中醫(yī)與古代哲學(xué)一體論探究[J];遼寧醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期
3 程記偉;白宇;蔡定芳;;《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》養(yǎng)生方法的整體觀探析[J];時(shí)珍國醫(yī)國藥;2015年11期
4 王小平;;論中醫(yī)氣概念的內(nèi)涵[J];陜西中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期
5 張子雋;張?jiān)伱?徐俊;陳巖;李向東;;印度傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀[J];世界中醫(yī)藥;2014年05期
6 宋一男;古繼紅;;順應(yīng)陰陽養(yǎng)生[J];新中醫(yī);2014年02期
7 楊鴻;周志彬;向勁松;楊蕻;;中醫(yī)學(xué)與印度傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)的關(guān)系[J];中醫(yī)文獻(xiàn)雜志;2013年05期
8 張光霽;董一帆;;“和”在中醫(yī)學(xué)中的體現(xiàn)[J];浙江中醫(yī)雜志;2013年08期
9 黃滿玉;郭艷幸;高書圖;趙涵正;;《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》中的體質(zhì)學(xué)說及臨床價(jià)值[J];天津中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期
10 穆罕默德·哈施米普;;兩種傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué):中醫(yī)學(xué)和阿育吠陀的基本原理比較[J];亞太傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)藥;2013年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 何穎;《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》養(yǎng)生觀的哲學(xué)探討[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號(hào):1942955
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/zhongyixuelunwen/1942955.html