【摘要】：目的 :探討《中國簡式明尼蘇達(dá)多相人格問卷》(Chi neseAbbreviatedFormMMPI,以下簡稱CAF MMPI)與新兵社會適應(yīng)性評價的關(guān)系 .方法 :選用MMPI的 4個效度量表和 8個臨床量表 ,經(jīng)修訂編CAF MMPI ,對 782名新兵進(jìn)行測試 ;自編《新兵社會適應(yīng)性調(diào)查表》(以下簡稱《調(diào)查表》)對其社會適應(yīng)性好壞進(jìn)行評價 ,根據(jù)評價結(jié)果選出適應(yīng)不良組 (n =36 )和正常組 (n =6 6 ) ,比較兩組CAF MMPI測驗(yàn)成績 .結(jié)果 :①同伴與上級《調(diào)查表》評價結(jié)果具有一致性 ;②除Hy外 ,適應(yīng)不良組各臨床量表原始分均顯著高于正常組 ,包括F效度量表 ;③適應(yīng)不良組各量表標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分 (≥ 6 5 )從高至低依次為F ,Sc ,Pt,Pd ,Pa和Hs.結(jié)論 :應(yīng)根據(jù)本研究結(jié)果 ,采用F ,Sc ,Pt和Pa測驗(yàn)量表修訂出新的CAF MMPI.
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between (Chi neseAbbreviatedFormMMPI, (Chinese simplified Minnesota Multiphasic Personality questionnaire) and Social adaptability Assessment of recruits. Methods: 782 recruits were tested by modified CAF MMPI, with 4 effect scales and 8 clinical scales of MMPI. The Social adaptability questionnaire of recruits (hereinafter referred to as "questionnaire") was designed to evaluate the social adaptability of recruits. According to the evaluation results, the maladjusted group (n = 36) and the normal group (n = 66) were selected to compare the scores of the two groups in CAF MMPI test. Results: (1) the evaluation results of peer and superior were consistent; (2) except Hy, the original scores of each clinical scale in the maladjusted group were significantly higher than those in the normal group, including the F effect scale; 3The standard scores of each scale (鈮，

本文編號：2289136