本文選題：高寒環(huán)境 + 軍人　； 參考：《新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：通過對高寒作業(yè)環(huán)境下軍人進(jìn)行心理疲勞問卷調(diào)查,了解高寒地區(qū)軍人心理健康狀況并探討其影響因素,為建立軍隊心理健康檔案數(shù)據(jù)庫,同時為管理者今后制定針對性的保護(hù)措施提供醫(yī)學(xué)依據(jù)。方法：采用整群隨機(jī)抽樣法抽取長期處于我國西部高寒地區(qū)(阿勒泰地區(qū))軍人305名作為觀察組,抽取市區(qū)(烏魯木齊市區(qū))入伍一年以上軍人574名作為對照組,進(jìn)行人口統(tǒng)計學(xué)資料、中文版多維疲勞量表(MFI-20)、特質(zhì)應(yīng)對方式問卷(TCSQ)、工作緊張測量問卷(JSS)、焦慮自評量表(SAS)及職業(yè)倦怠問卷(CMBI)等心理健康狀況問卷調(diào)查與測評。結(jié)果：1.觀察組軍人的體力疲勞、活動減少、腦力疲勞和疲勞總分均高于對照組,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義。2.不同軍齡、入伍前戶籍、是否為獨生子女、軍人類別及其體力疲勞、活動減少和腦力疲勞差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義�！�8年軍齡組和3-7年軍齡組軍人疲勞總分、體力疲勞、腦力疲勞顯著高于≤2年軍齡組,農(nóng)村兵動力下降程度高于城市兵,獨生子女軍人體力疲勞、疲勞總分高于非獨生子女軍人,士官和義務(wù)兵的體力疲勞、疲勞總分大于軍官,而軍官的腦力疲勞高于士官和義務(wù)兵,高寒地區(qū)軍人工作壓力指數(shù)高于對照組,軍人成就感降低、人格解體、職業(yè)倦怠均高于對照組,軍人積極應(yīng)對方式和消極應(yīng)對方式以及焦慮程度均高于對照組。3.軍人積極應(yīng)對方式和疲勞的總分等因素呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān),而消極應(yīng)對方式和疲勞的總分等因素呈顯著正相關(guān),焦慮和疲勞的總分等因素呈顯著正相關(guān)：情感耗竭、成就感降低和疲勞總分、體力疲勞、腦力疲勞呈正相關(guān)；人格解體、倦怠總分和疲勞總分、體力疲勞、活動減少、腦力疲勞呈正相關(guān)；軍人工作緊張指數(shù)、工作壓力指數(shù)、組織支持缺乏指數(shù)和體力疲勞、腦力疲勞和疲勞總分呈正相關(guān)；工作壓力指數(shù)和動力下降呈負(fù)相關(guān)。經(jīng)回歸分析表明,隨著積極應(yīng)對方式的加強(qiáng),軍人的心理疲勞程度隨之減少；隨著消極應(yīng)對方式、情感耗竭、成就感降低、工作緊張強(qiáng)度、工作壓力強(qiáng)度、組織支持缺乏強(qiáng)度、組織支持缺乏頻度、組織支持缺乏指數(shù)的增大,軍人的心理疲勞程度也隨之增大。結(jié)論：1.高寒環(huán)境下軍人的心理疲勞程度較高,說明高寒環(huán)境會對軍人心理健康產(chǎn)生一定的影響；2.研究表明,高寒環(huán)境下軍人軍齡越長疲勞程度越高,農(nóng)村兵適應(yīng)艱苦環(huán)境的能力強(qiáng)于城市兵,獨生子女軍人與非獨生子女軍人相比更容易疲勞,士官和義務(wù)兵更容易發(fā)生體力疲勞,軍官容易產(chǎn)生腦力疲勞；高寒作業(yè)環(huán)境對軍人緊張程度、職業(yè)倦怠程度、應(yīng)對方式、焦慮水平有影響。3.不同環(huán)境中軍人職業(yè)緊張、職業(yè)倦怠、特質(zhì)應(yīng)對方式、焦慮與疲勞及其各維度存在相關(guān)性。經(jīng)回歸分析表明,應(yīng)對方式、倦怠和工作緊張等指標(biāo)均為軍人心理健康的影響因素。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the mental health status and its influencing factors of military personnel in alpine working environment by means of psychological fatigue questionnaire, in order to establish the military mental health archives database. At the same time, it provides medical basis for managers to formulate targeted protective measures in the future. Methods: a total of 305 soldiers in the western alpine region (Altay area) were selected as observation group by cluster random sampling method, and 574 soldiers in urban area (Urumqi city) served as control group for more than one year. The Chinese version of the Multidimensional fatigue scale (MFI-20), the trait coping style questionnaire (TCSQA), the Job stress questionnaire (JSSQ), the Self-Rating anxiety scale (SAS) and the Job Burnout questionnaire (CMBI) were conducted. The result is 1: 1. The total scores of physical fatigue, activity reduction, mental fatigue and fatigue in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences in different military age, before enlistment, whether registered as an only child, type of serviceman and their physical fatigue, decrease of activity and mental fatigue. Total score of fatigue and physical fatigue in the group of 鈮，

本文編號：2000321