本文選題：焦慮 + 應(yīng)激��； 參考：《中國臨床康復(fù)》2005年40期

【摘要】：目的:探討跳傘應(yīng)激對野戰(zhàn)部隊傘兵抑郁、焦慮及情緒自控能力和穩(wěn)定性的影響。方法:于2004-07-06/08-14整群抽取某野戰(zhàn)部隊71名男性傘兵作為調(diào)查對象。①采用情緒自控能力量表評定調(diào)查對象的情緒自控力:由20項題目組成,每題有3個答案,分別記1、2、3分,總分40分為正常,得分越低,情緒自控越差。②采用情緒穩(wěn)定性量表評定調(diào)查對象的情緒穩(wěn)定性:由22項題目組成,每題有3個答案,分別記2、0、1分,總分20分為正常,得分越高,情緒穩(wěn)定性越差。③采用狀態(tài)—特質(zhì)焦慮量表評定調(diào)查對象的焦慮狀況:由兩張問卷共40項描述題組成。1～20項為狀態(tài)焦慮量表,主要用于評價應(yīng)激情況下的狀態(tài)焦慮,21～40題為特質(zhì)焦慮量表,用于評定人們經(jīng)常的情緒體驗。④采用焦慮自評量表和抑郁自評量表測定調(diào)查對象的抑郁及焦慮程度:由20個陳述句和相應(yīng)問題條目組成,均為4級評分(1～4),得分越高抑郁及焦慮程度越重。于跳傘前2d、前1個月及3次跳傘后,對調(diào)查對象進(jìn)行集體情緒測驗,統(tǒng)一指導(dǎo)語,測驗時間約90min。組間比較采用方差分析。結(jié)果:發(fā)放問卷76份,回收71份,回收率為93%。①跳傘應(yīng)激前情緒穩(wěn)定性、自控能力和特質(zhì)焦慮情況:跳傘應(yīng)激前2d調(diào)查對象情緒穩(wěn)定性評分為15.6±4.6,20分者有53人(74.6%),≥20分者有18人(25.4%);情緒自控能力評分為48.3±6.4,≤40分者有12人(16.9%),40分有59人(83.1%);跳傘應(yīng)激調(diào)查對象特質(zhì)焦慮評分為顯著高于國內(nèi)男性常模(t=3.26,P0.01)。②跳傘應(yīng)激前后焦慮、抑郁情緒變化:與跳傘前1個月相比,跳傘前2d,調(diào)查對象焦慮、抑郁情緒評分及大于50分的比例顯著增加(P0.01～0.05),完成3次跳傘后,焦慮、抑郁評分仍大于跳傘前1個月及前2d(P0.01～0.05),焦慮評分大于50分的比例較跳傘前2d有所降低,但仍高于跳傘前1個月,抑郁評分大于50分的比例較跳傘前1個月及前2d顯著升高(P0.01)。結(jié)論:跳傘前2d,調(diào)查對象情緒不穩(wěn)定、自控能力差,焦慮、抑郁情緒增加,3次跳傘完成后焦慮情緒有所降低,而抑郁情緒加重,跳傘應(yīng)激對野戰(zhàn)部隊傘兵焦慮、抑郁情緒有顯著的影響。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effects of parachuting stress on depression, anxiety and emotional control ability and stability of paratroopers in field troops. Methods: a total of 71 male paratroopers from a field army were selected in a cluster from July 06, 2004 to August 14, 2004. 1 the emotional self-control ability scale was used to assess the emotional self-control ability of the subjects. The subjects were divided into 20 subjects with three answers and one score of 2,3 points. The total score of 40 was normal, and the lower the score, the worse the self-control of emotion. 2 the emotional stability scale was used to assess the emotional stability of the subjects: it was composed of 22 questions, each of which had three answers, with a score of 2 and 1, and a total score of 20 as normal. The higher the score, the worse the emotional stability. 3 the state trait anxiety scale was used to assess the anxiety status of the subjects. It is mainly used to evaluate state anxiety under stress. Used to assess people's frequent emotional experiences. 4. Self rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self rating Depression scale (SDS) were used to measure the degree of depression and anxiety in subjects: 20 declarative sentences and corresponding question items were used to measure the degree of depression and anxiety. The higher the score was, the higher the depression and anxiety were. At 2 days before parachuting, 1 month and 3 times after parachuting, the subjects were tested with collective emotion test and unified instruction, the test time was about 90 mins. ANOVA was used to compare the two groups. Results: 76 questionnaires were sent out and 71 were recovered. The recovery rate was 93.1 emotional stability before parachuting stress. Self-control ability and trait anxiety: the scores of emotional stability were 15.6 鹵4.6, 74.66 and 25.4m respectively in the subjects with 20 points and 鈮，

本文編號：1859658